similar to: [LLVMdev] How to deal with wider Integer type?

Some code in GVN.cpp: static Value *CoerceAvailableValueToLoadType(Value *StoredVal, Type *LoadedTy, Instruction *InsertPt, const DataLayout &DL) { .... // Convert vectors and fp to integer, which can be manipulated. if (!StoredValTy->isIntegerTy()) {

Is it just an optimization pass? Maybe I can cancel it somehow with a flag or by doing some code editing? Can you point me to which passes may do that? I'm working on editing a backend that can't work with anything larger than 32 bits. Does the legalize stage work on IR code? Maybe i can use that? On Jan 29, 2015 5:41 AM, Ruiling Song <ruiling.song83 at gmail.com> wrote: LLVM

> On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:26, Ruiling Song <ruiling.song83 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2016-12-20 22:14 GMT+08:00 Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net <mailto:tom at stellard.net>>: > > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:00:09AM +0800, Ruiling Song wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am working on a new LLVM target for Intel GPU, which

Generally legalize at IR level is not a good idea. But if you need legalization on IR code, you can check PNaCl project. https://chromium.googlesource.com/native_client/pnacl-llvm/ The pass is located at: lib/Transforms/NaCl/ExpandLargeIntegers.cpp You need make some change, as the pass split large integer into 64bit integers. 2015-01-29 16:06 GMT+08:00 Alon Shaltiel (ashaltie) <ashaltie at

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:31:57AM -0500, Matt Arsenault wrote: > > > On Dec 21, 2016, at 10:26, Ruiling Song <ruiling.song83 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-12-20 22:14 GMT+08:00 Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net <mailto:tom at stellard.net>>: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:00:09AM +0800, Ruiling Song

2016-12-20 22:14 GMT+08:00 Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:00:09AM +0800, Ruiling Song wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am working on a new LLVM target for Intel GPU, which also has same kind > > of scalar/vector register classes used in AMDGPU target. Like for a i32 > > virtual register, it will be held in scalar register if its

Hi Escha, Great to have your comment! Do you have any specific reason for not doing like this? I am not sure whether I understand your point correctly. For "just model one thread", do you mean "only considering ONE of the 8/16 working lanes that running in lock-step way"?? For my case, may be something like I only need to define r0~r127 as register for i32 register (each r#

Hi, I want to get the information where the address of load/store comes from, like below load instruction, %152 may come from a getelementpr, or comes from some gep+ptrtoint+add+inttoptr... instructions. what's the recommended way to find the original memory pointer? %153 = load <2 x i16> addrspace(1)* %152, align 2 going through the use-def chain seems not easy, because the

Hi LLVM, 1. Can mul and/or div support be added for big integer types like i256? 2. What are the limits? 3. If yes, how should it be done? I have experience only with X86 target and know that mul i128 works and div i128 is lowered to function call from compile-rt like library (what works only if you link with such library). Can that support be extended? - Paweł -------------- next part

> -----Original Message----- > From: meinersbur at googlemail.com [mailto:meinersbur at googlemail.com] On > Behalf Of Michael Kruse > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 1:18 PM > To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.song at intel.com> > Cc: Michael Kruse <llvm at meinersbur.de>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: Possible bug of Alias Analysis? > > 2017-10-18

> -----Original Message----- > From: meinersbur at googlemail.com [mailto:meinersbur at googlemail.com] On > Behalf Of Michael Kruse > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:26 PM > To: Song, Ruiling <ruiling.song at intel.com> > Cc: llvm at meinersbur.de; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: Possible bug of Alias Analysis? > > 2017-10-17 8:45 GMT+02:00 Song,

Hi, I am an out-of-tree user of llvm. I am running into an regression issue against llvm 5.0. The issue was introduced by "[BasicAA] Use MayAlias instead of PartialAlias for fallback."( https://reviews.llvm.org/D34318) I have attached a very simple program to reproduce the issue. The symptom is alias analysis report NoAlias to GVN which cause GVN do wrong optimization. The BasicAA

Hi, The gpu target I am working on requires the 'value' and 'address' operands of memory store instruction in consecutive register. Anybody has suggestion? - Ruiling -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160909/e9d330bc/attachment.html>

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:00:09AM +0800, Ruiling Song wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on a new LLVM target for Intel GPU, which also has same kind > of scalar/vector register classes used in AMDGPU target. Like for a i32 > virtual register, it will be held in scalar register if its value is > uniform across a wavefront/warp, otherwise it will be in a vector register. > Does

Yes, the arch is just as you said, something like AMD GPU, but Intel GPU don't have separate register file for 'scalar/vector'. In fact my idea of defining the register tuples was borrowed from SIRegisterInfo.td in AMD GPU. But seems that AMD GPU mainly support i32/i64 register type, while Intel GPU also support byte/short register type. So I have to start defining the registers from

On 01/01/2013 02:45 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > >> >> In our compiler we use a modified version LLVM Polly, which is very >> sensitive to >> proper code generation. Among the number of limitations, the loop region >> (enclosed by phi node on induction variable and branch) is required to >> be free >> of additional memory-dependent

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:03 PM, jin chuan see via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Thanks for the reply. I managed to identify and fixed a few errors in my implementation. > > However, there are a few errors that i am not sure what is it indicating. > For starters, i think i should explain what i am trying to achieve. > > I am

Hi everyone! Here, I have a question and am curious about i128. I want to know how the LLVM handle i128, because many compiler backend doesn't support i128 directly. So I am very curious and want to how the llvm handle this situation? Besides i128, such as i256, i512, even i24? Thanks. Best Regards Wu Zhao -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi,everyone. I'm writing a pass in which a CallInst to an external function will be inserted. The function is declared like this: void func(int a, unsigned chat *p); and in the Pass(a Function Pass ,and using the InstVistor template ), I wrote like this: void visitStoreInst(StoreInst &SI) { //Get the refference of the types Module *M =

Hi Duncan & Tobi, Thanks a lot for your interest, and for pointing out differences in GIMPLE I missed. Attached is simplified test case. Is it good? Tobi, regarding runtime alias analysis: in KernelGen we already do it along with runtime values substitution. For example: <------------------ __kernelgen_main_loop_17: compile started ---------------------> Integer args substituted: