similar to: [LLVMdev] buildbot change for Mips slave - please review

Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> writes: >> Right, I get that. Actually I would probably use --enable-werror. >> >> Should I create a patch for builders.py to add a new config? > > Yes. Send it to llvm-commits and CC Galina Kistanova. Ok, cool. Thanks! >> Is there a way to map a config so that it only even builds on a certain >> buildslave?

Galina, Looks like the build bots have frozen. Expected? Joe Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com> www.arxan.com<http://www.arxan.com/> On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Galina Kistanova wrote: Author: gkistanova Date: Fri Nov 18 13:49:26 2011 New Revision: 144978

Hi all, I'm working on adding a new buildbot. I'm don't understand what is required when patching zorg's builders.py and slaves.py. Is there any documentation on this? Would anybody be willing to help? Best, Eric Fiselier -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Here are some examples using the gnu assembler reacting to the same input file with different commandline options. These are using the GCC assembler on hello.c // abi o32, arch mips32r2, relocation model pic+cpic mips-linux-gnu-as -mips32r2 -EL -KPIC -o hello_gas.o hello_gas.s e_flags 0x70001007 EF_MIPS_NOREORDER EF_MIPS_PIC EF_MIPS_CPIC E_MIPS_ABI_O32 EF_MIPS_ARCH_32R2 // abi

On 7 December 2012 18:57, Carter, Jack <jcarter at mips.com> wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > There are a lot of flags. Here are the ones you ask about: > > -KPIC, -call_shared generate SVR4 position independent code > -call_nonpic generate non-PIC code that can operate with DSOs > -mvxworks-pic generate VxWorks position independent code > -non_shared

On Dec 10, 2012, at 1:15 PM, "Carter, Jack" <jcarter at mips.com> wrote: > Here are some examples using the gnu assembler reacting to the same input file with different commandline options. > > These are using the GCC assembler on hello.c > // abi o32, arch mips32r2, relocation model pic+cpic > mips-linux-gnu-as -mips32r2 -EL -KPIC -o hello_gas.o hello_gas.s >

Hi Rafael, There are a lot of flags. Here are the ones you ask about: -KPIC, -call_shared generate SVR4 position independent code -call_nonpic generate non-PIC code that can operate with DSOs -mvxworks-pic generate VxWorks position independent code -non_shared do not generate code that can operate with DSOs -xgot assume a 32 bit GOT Just to make things fun, the SGI notion of cpic (call pic)

Jim, You are correct: MipsSubtarget. For llvm-mc we have a straight MCSubtargetInfo object. For llc we get a MipsSubtarget object which derives from MipsGenSubtargetInfo which derives from TargetSubtargetInfo which derives from MCSubtargetInfo. The patch I hope to send out for review will do this: Add a new data member to MCSubtargetInfo base class. It will be a set of integers that is used or

But then I should write // CHECK: something // SSE: something // SSE3: something With this feature it can be write // {{[A-Z0-9]+}} : something From: James Y Knight [mailto:jyknight at google.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:53 PM To: Ehsan Amiri <ehsanamiri at gmail.com> Cc: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject:

Galina, Please apply the following patch Index: master/config/builders.py =================================================================== --- master/config/builders.py (revision 143312) +++ master/config/builders.py (working copy) @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ {'name': "llvm-ppc-darwin", 'slavenames':["arxan_bellini"],

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Ehsan Amiri via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 7. Wildcard for prefixes - If some statements should be checked > regardless prefix, it should be used //{{*}}, //{{*}}-NEXT, //{{*}}-SAME > and etc. > >> 8. Prefix with regular expressions - If statement should be >> checked if prefix matches some regular

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Carter, Jack <jcarter at mips.com> wrote: > Has anyone converted llvm/projects/test-suite to use the llvm assembler > instead of gcc? > > If so, what was needed to change and how? > > My assumption is that this would be a good way to test the llvm assembler. > Not quite sure what you mean, as far as I know there isn't any assembler

Has anyone converted llvm/projects/test-suite to use the llvm assembler instead of gcc? If so, what was needed to change and how? My assumption is that this would be a good way to test the llvm assembler. Jack -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121015/a91a495f/attachment.html>

We are trying to use LLVM (Clang as the C frontend) to generate code for 32-bit MIPS (little-endian)l, which can run on simplescalar 3.0 sslittle-na-sstrix platform. Can you advise what would be the right way to use the LLVM compiler infrastructure? The following is the one I used, but it appears that it produce the code in big-endian (and I wonder whether the calling convention is right.) To

> OK, I'm going to just reply to the last because I think it's the most important part of all this and would like to try to have us side tracked again. If you'd like I can reply to it, but let's take the last part first :) > > > > Could you please provide some examples of things that are impossible right now > > > with command lines, how those interact with

> > The word 'all' is what still bothers me here. If any one piece of the information is derived from incorrect information in the triple, then the behaviour will likely be incorrect. > > If it's possible to be derived from the triple then it's going to be correct or the triple is incorrect. > If it's something that's overridden later because it can't be

Rewrote the ABI example in terms of clang -cc1as which is a supported tool. Note that the same problems exist and that they are unrelated to the existence of TargetMachine or not since TargetMachine gets the relevant information from the Triple it holds. This information is incorrect, even as a starting point. Please do read the other examples in my previous email. It contains a number of

> > Note that the same problems exist and that they are unrelated to the existence > > of TargetMachine or not since TargetMachine gets the relevant information from > > the Triple it holds. This information is incorrect, even as a starting point. > > I believe we're going to disagree here as the TargetMachine does not get all of its > information from the Triple -

Hi Robert, Can you ping the code owners about these patches. It might be good to write a separate email per code owner and cc the appropriate -commits list. Thanks, Tom On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:16:44PM +0400, Robert Khasanov wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I would like to nominate the following patches to be backported to 3.4.1 > > Clang: > 1. r204742 - Zinovy Nis <zinovy.nis at

It will produce little-endian code if you replace "mips" with "mipsel". 1. clang -ccc-host-triple mipsel-unknown-linux -ccc-clang-archs mipsel -O3 -S -emit-llvm foo.c -o foo.ll 2. llc -march=mipsel -mcpu=4ke foo.ll -o foo.s (the -march option is redundant) If you do not specify the target cpu with -mcpu, by default it will generate code for Mips1, which has not been tested as