similar to: [LLVMdev] Patch available for bug 15079

Currently the LLVMbugs list only receives emails when a new bug is filed or an existing bug gets finally resolved. The gcc-bugs list on the other hand receives an email for every new comment in bugzilla. This leads to much better transparency, because you can easily see which bugs are currently being worked on; while the current LLVMbugs setup left you totally in the dark. So my suggestion would

Hi Evgeny, I just realized that if these are compile-time errors I can help investigate on my end. Do you have something I can use to reproduce? Cheers, Graham Yiu LLVM Compiler Development IBM Toronto Software Lab Office: (905) 413-4077 C2-707/8200/Markham Email: gyiu at ca.ibm.com From: Graham Yiu/Toronto/IBM To: Evgeny Astigeevich <Evgeny.Astigeevich at arm.com> Cc:

Hi Graham, Thank you for offering help. I am trying to create a reproducer. The problem is that the crashes happen whilst LTO is used. One thing I am sure about IR is broken at compile time. Thanks, Evgeny From: Graham Yiu <gyiu at ca.ibm.com> Date: Friday, 10 November 2017 at 16:09 To: Evgeny Astigeevich <Evgeny.Astigeevich at arm.com> Cc: "junbuml at codeaurora.org"

LLVM, What do I pass into the DSG in order to access the globals vector of functions that a function pointer may be calling. The code: CallInst *calli = dynamic_cast<CallInst*>(*i); std::vector<GlobalValue*> funcVect = theGraph.getNodeForValue(calli->getCalledFunction()).getNode()->getGlobals(); Doesn't appear to work... getCalledFunction() returns 0 Dave On Fri, 6 Dec

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >>>> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify >>>> printOp for your asmprinters. >>> I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? >> Why does it need to be virtual? No 'intel' printers want % signs. > > The GAS intel code generator generates percents,

Hello All, This conversations seems to have fizzled out and I would like to try to revive it. My intention is to pick up where Graham left off with enabling partial-inlining by default. On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 13/11/2017 14:47, Evgeny Astigeevich via llvm-dev wrote: > >> Hi Graham,

Hi Sean, Thank you for reminding me. It looks like it get lost among tons of emails and other tasks. I’ll check if the code size issues still exist. Thanks, Evgeny Astigeevich From: Sean Fertile <sd.fertile at gmail.com> Date: Monday, 29 January 2018 at 19:52 To: Florian Hahn <Florian.Hahn at arm.com> Cc: Evgeny Astigeevich <Evgeny.Astigeevich at arm.com>, Graham Yiu <gyiu

Forgot to add that all experiments were done with '-O3 -m64 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager'. Graham Yiu LLVM Compiler Development IBM Toronto Software Lab Office: (905) 413-4077 C2-707/8200/Markham Email: gyiu at ca.ibm.com From: Graham Yiu/Toronto/IBM To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Cc: junbuml at codeaurora.org, xinliangli at gmail.com Date: 11/02/2017 05:26 PM Subject: [RFC]

This came up when trying to compile the Python bindings against llvm 1.7. File include/llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h declares llvm::createPREPass(), which does not seem to be implemented anywhere. Should I report this in llvmbugs? -- Pertti

Hello, We were doing some experiments to deserialize/JIT bitcode on multiple threads and we hit what looks like this issue: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmbugs/2013-April/027937.html We're using LLVM-3.5 so I was a bit surprised that the patch that was provided in 2013 doesn't appear to be in the current codebase. I'm curious what the status of this patch and issue are? Are

While trying to set up samba as a PDC, I followed O'Reillys Using Samba. This resulted in the following smb.conf: [global] workgroup = GRAHAM encrypt passwords = true log level = 1 max log size = 1000 hosts allow = 192.168.0/24 192.168.1/24 hosts deny = 1.1.1.1/0.0.0.0 domain logons = yes security = user os level = 34 local master = yes preferred master = yes domain master = yes [temp]

Hi, I have a small example program that is supposed to generate cross-compiled JIT code with the MCJIT execution engine on an x86 host. The code works fine if I choose x86 as target platform, but if I choose ARM, I hit an assertion in include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h:260 (This is not a register operand). I am not sure if an older post regarding this assertion are relevant to my problem (

Hi, I am trying to install llvm 2.5 in my PowerPC machine. I have already installed XCode Tools 2.4.1. I can compile programs using gcc run them. I try to configure llvm 2.5, the configuration aborts with following message: checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 checking target system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0

Hi Graham, Your guess is right. The event loop stuff is handled differently on Windows than on Unix-like OSes. There is a hook, called tcl_do that is hard-coded into the R Windows GUI. It is called whenever the console is idle. RGtk2 is able to hook into that to process GTK+ events. The problem is that the two packages replace each other's handler. So in this case tcltk is blocking GTK+ from

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Graham Yiu <gyiu at ca.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Hi Teresa, >> >> Actually, enabling the new pass manager manually seems to have solved >> this issue, so this problem is only valid for the old pass manager. >> >

Thanks Easwaran. This is what we've observed as well, where the old PM inliner was only looking hot/cold callee information, which have signficantly smaller boosts/penalties compared to callsite information. Teresa, do you know if there is some documentation/video/presentation on how PGO information is represented in LLVM and what information is passed via the IR? I'm finding some

I've built LLVM/Clang from svn under Cygwin on Windows 7. I'd like to build on the LLVMHello pass example, however, when I try: $ cd $LLVM/lib/Transforms/Hello $ make I receive a large number of errors which start with: llvm[0]: Linking Debug+Asserts Loadable Module LLVMHello.dll /cygdrive/c/Users/Graham/home/projects/llvm_cygwin/lib/Transforms/Hello/Debug+Asserts/Hello.o: In function

Hi Teresa, Actually, enabling the new pass manager manually seems to have solved this issue, so this problem is only valid for the old pass manager. Thanks, Graham Yiu LLVM Compiler Development IBM Toronto Software Lab Office: (905) 413-4077 C2-707/8200/Markham Email: gyiu at ca.ibm.com From: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> To: Graham Yiu <gyiu at ca.ibm.com> Cc:

> > Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this > > mail list? > > A better list for it would be the llvmbugs list for now. ok > BTW, if you are interested in running the nightly tester on your freebsd > box, let me know and I can help you get it set up. What i must install or have installed ? I doesn't have root access at this machine,

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > I'm mostly up to date, but not completely current with CVS. Is this > something that's been fixed recently, or is it a problem on my end? Try rerunning configure. For some reason, configure decided you didn't have runtest/expect. rerun configure, and if it still doesn't work, please send your config.log to llvmbugs. Thx,