Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] `MDNode *getLoopID () const` missing from LoopInfo.h"
2013 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] `MDNode *getLoopID () const` missing from LoopInfo.h
Hi,
The getLoopID method was missing from LLVM 3.3's LoopInfo.h. But the latest documentation has it ... probably the documentation is lagging behind in the update?
Gai
2014 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] How to print a list of used LLVM APIs in a given open source project?
Hi,
Assume there's an open source compiler implementation based on LLVM/Clang. What is the neatest way to print a list of LLVM APIs used in that open source project? Thanks.
Best,
Jiading
2014 Jan 17
2
[LLVMdev] Do all user-written passes have to be run through a PassManager object (called from outside the LLVM infrastructure)?
Thanks John. Out of curiosity, I wonder if it's possible to summarize the LLVMpass-specific design patterns. I.e., the software engineering techniques that were used to design/implement the LLVM Pass Infrastructure. Equivalently, this may also answer the question "Why is the code this way". This visibility can improve understanding and that is likely to improve quality as more
2020 Mar 03
2
Has the work in this talk been pushed: "Better C++ debugging using Clang Modules in LLDB"?
Hi,
I tried using lldb built from master, but still seeing some STL
container member functions not recognizable in a debugging session. I am
wondering if the work has been pushed to master; also if it's pushed but
not enabled by default yet, is there a flag I can use to turn on the
expression evaluator using Clang modules. Thanks a lot for the great work.
Best Regards,
Jiading
2014 Jan 16
3
[LLVMdev] Do all user-written passes have to be run through a PassManager object (called from outside the LLVM infrastructure)?
I have written several passes that have no pre-requisites for any
previous LLVM native passes prior to my own. For those passes, I have verified that at
least the following two approaches are equivalent in terms of executing
those self-written passes and getting the correct results:
#if METHOD_1
PassManager PM;
2020 Mar 20
5
CFG manipulation and !llvm.loop metadata
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200320/34cdec77/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
Hi all,
I have encountered some issues with the preservation of the location of llvm.loop metadata (containing optimisation hints), and would appreciate some feedback on the issue.
The IR language description states that
2018 Jun 08
2
/etc/gai.conf fails to prefer IPv4 over IPv6 for NFS
In article <669037eb-029c-eb3b-0c60-6a5121142bb8 at gmail.com>,
Gordon Messmer <centos at centos.org> wrote:
>On 06/08/2018 10:42 AM, Steve Rikli wrote:
>
>> I found posts from others in a similar situation, and proposed solutions
>> included modifying /etc/gai.conf to use:
>>
>> precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 100
>
> From my reading of that file,
2018 Jun 09
2
/etc/gai.conf fails to prefer IPv4 over IPv6 for NFS
In article <bc751efa-07f1-91de-9248-5f90f961bcb4 at gmail.com>,
Gordon Messmer <centos at centos.org> wrote:
>On 06/08/2018 03:23 PM, Steve Rikli wrote:
>>
>> This seems the most likely explanation, I'd just like to know for certain
>> before I give up on gai.conf and restort to disabling IPv6 or other
>> workarounds (e.g. /etc/nfsmount.conf).
>
2018 Jun 08
2
/etc/gai.conf fails to prefer IPv4 over IPv6 for NFS
Using CentOS 6.9 with IPv4 configured, and _not_ disabling IPv6 yet, we
want this NFS client system to prefer the IPv4 address of a dual-stack
remote NFS server, which has both A and AAAA records in DNS.
Otherwise we get a minutes long pause while automounter tries to mount
the IPv6 address -- I can see automounter's '/bin/mount' running, using
the AAAA record of the server, until
2013 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] parallel loop metadata simplification
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pekka Jääskeläinen" <pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi>
> To: "Paul Redmond" <paul.redmond at intel.com>
> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es>, "<llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>"
> <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 5,
2013 Mar 05
1
[LLVMdev] parallel loop metadata simplification
On 03/05/2013 07:12 PM, Redmond, Paul wrote:
> Attached is my most recent patch for clang. Maybe someone wants to play with
> it or has ideas on how to refine the llvm.mem metadata generation.
+ } else if (I->mayReadOrWriteMemory())
+ I->setMetadata("llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access",
+ L.GetLoopID(I->getContext()));
+ }
Here we want to not add
2003 Jul 05
2
Unhelpful error message when matching hosts in access list [PATCH]
Greetings,
As previously reported by me to the Debian bug tracking system:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An access list in rsyncd.conf may contain hostnames as well as
addresses. It may contain several patterns to match against.
address_match (in access.c) does this by trying to match hostname and
address against each of the patterns until a match is
2015 Jun 13
1
Testin new installation
On 06/13/2015 01:41 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:36:21 -0600, you wrote:
>
>> Look at /etc/hosts ::1 is the ipv6 version of localhost.
> Right. I actually knew that. So why does that take precedence for the
> definition of localhost even though it's not the first line in the
> file?
IPv6 is preferred when available.
See man 5 gai.conf
2005 Oct 12
1
(no subject) -- re-subscribe my IEEE with NO postingprivileges
Agreed!
Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com
(610)796-5838
>>> craigwhite at azapple.com 10/12/05 09:35AM >>>
List owners of course have the option to knock people out but are almost
always wisest not to use that power except when absolutely necessary and
I'm quite certain that it hadn't reached that state.
2005 Nov 08
1
Reducing the deleterious effects ofego related issues on the list
Bryan... NOBODY CARES how many times Chris is wrong.
NOBODY CARES what you prove on this point.
Whether Chris is right, wrong or stoopid is NOT proper fodder for this (CENTOS) list.
Chris being wrong is *strictly* a "Bryan Fixation".
Part of YOU growing up is YOU realizing that whether Chris is or is not
wrong is UNIMPORTANT to ANYTHING that you or anybody important
to you think is
2005 Nov 08
1
Reducing the deleterious effects ofego related issueson the list
How about DiabloII (Lord of Destruction)?
I've heard of it running under Winex/Cedega (which is not Wine nor is it freeware) but not under wine or native...
Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com
(610)796-5838
>>> peter at farrows.org 11/08/05 10:02AM >>>
UT 2004 does run on Linux......
Client and dedicated servers....
2015 Mar 02
2
Update
Thanks. No other interfaces (ifconfig -a)?
Also output of
ip -f inet6 route
would be useful.
David
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr David Holder CEng FIET MIEEE
Erion Ltd, An Cala, Inverkirkaig, Lochinver, Sutherland, IV27 4LR, UK
Reception: +44 (0)1422 207000
Direct Dial: +44 (0)131 2026317
http://www.erion.co.uk
Registered in England and
2013 Mar 05
2
[LLVMdev] parallel loop metadata simplification
Hi,
On 2013-03-03, at 2:58 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
>
> I agree; we should only annotate accesses that some from language-level array/pointer(/reference) accesses. We should then rely on other passes to clean up (or not) the remainder.
>
> I think that the best way to handle local arrays is to issue a warning when they occur inside an annotated loop that the local array will probably
2020 Aug 11
3
ipv6 NAT; accept_ra errors and about network choice
Hello,
Firstly THANK YOU for the IPv6 NAT support merged in 6.5. It has been
almost impossible to get IPv6 into a VM on a laptop that switches
between wifi and wired (dock) connections, because you can not add a
wifi interface to a bridge. I know NAT is against the IPv6 end-to-end
xen but it makes this "just work" for the vast majority of people like
me who need to ssh/curl/talk to
2005 Sep 19
8
upgrade problem
Currently we have RH7.3 with compiler gcc 2.96.x
My mission, should I choose to accept it, involves moving
our embedded application to CentOS 4.1 with gcc 3.x
Problem is that about 1/2 million lines of code that gcc 2.96
accepts gives fatal fits to the gcc 3.x compiler from CentOS 4.1
I don't know how many fatal fits, as some disguise others etc.
"Can't find register to