similar to: [LLVMdev] an OS around LLVM

We (PNaCl team) are in the process of removing older documentation, this is probably more accurate: https://developers.google.com/native-client/dev/ On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Sam Parker <S.Parker3 at lboro.ac.uk> wrote: > Check out PNaCL > http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl > > Cheers, > Sam > > Sam Parker > Research Student > Electronic Systems

Check out PNaCL http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl Cheers, Sam Sam Parker Research Student Electronic Systems Design Group Loughborough University UK ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of mindmachine at free.fr [mindmachine at free.fr] Sent: 17 December 2013 14:03 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject:

Thanks, I hadn't heard about PNaCl, it's very interesting. I'm currently swimming in http://llvm.org/docs/ trying to learn more about LLVM-IR... Selon JF Bastien <jfb at google.com>: > We (PNaCl team) are in the process of removing older documentation, > this is probably more accurate: > https://developers.google.com/native-client/dev/ > > On Tue, Dec 17,

Hi All, can anyone tell me where I can find the sources for the llva-emu project? I've tried to contact  Michael Brukman or Brian Gaeke but no reply. thank you for any help, dacian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130719/94fcf74b/attachment.html>

On Apr 3, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On 4/2/07, Fabian Scheler <fabian.scheler at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform >> performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the >> derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the >>

Hi, I ran into a problem when running DSA on Linux kernel (the Kernel version I used is 2.4.31). The analysis was aborted when it tried to do DSNode::mergeTypeInfo on some data structure in the kernel. I have filed a bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1656. My question is what version of Linux kernel LLVM has been tested on successfully? To run DSA analysis, should I use the

Hi Konstantin, good point. but I my intention is to have something like the llva project. Basically I would like to define a machine that looks as if it has processors running natively llvm code. And when that runs enhance the llvm byte code with some specific instructions. Besides this if I make my measurements on the running of llvm bytecode I can test several platforms simultaneously because I

Hi I want to pursue a project based to improve the existing KCoFI method which is the Control Flow integrity method for commodity os. Since KCoFI is a llvm based project I plan to undertake the project to improve the existing KCoFI method. Following are the improvements that I want to pursue: 1. To improve the call graph used in KCoFI. Implement a stronger call graph. 2. Port the KCoFI to

Hi In my previous mail I mentioned the project on KCoFI( the control FLow integrity methods for commodity hardware http://sva.cs.illinois.edu/pubs/KCoFI-Oakland-2014.pdf ). Will it be more helpful to the community if I do the improvements number #1 and #3 mentioned in my previous mail to the mailing list or if i try to port it to arm architecture? I have decided to go ahead with the improvements

On 7/19/13 3:20 AM, Herbei Dacian wrote: > > > Hi All, > can anyone tell me where I can find the sources for the llva-emu project? The llva-emu code is extremely old and, as I recall, not very feature-filled. It was also done for a class project (I don't think it was used for the original LLVA publication, and it wasn't used for any of the subsequent LLVA/SVA publications

Hello everybody, I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the value-range-propagation pass I read about on this list some time ago) but even more I am interested in exec-time modeling (how long does it take to execute a bunch of LLVA instructions on

> > LLVA specifically is refering to a research project offshoot of llvm. > > LLVM instructions do not have 1:1 mappings to native instructions > > (sometimes multiple llvm instructions map to fewer native insts, > > sometimes the other way around). > > That's correct, and furthermore, LLVA (now called SVA = Secure > Virtual Architecture) uses essentially the

On 9/19/13 9:53 AM, Herbei Dacian wrote: > > Hi Konstantin, > good point. > but I my intention is to have something like the llva project. If you want something like the LLVA project for user-space applications, then you basically want to use LLVM as-is. The only things missing are the instructions that replace certain in-line assembly sequences that cannot be represented by

On 4/2/07, Fabian Scheler <fabian.scheler at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform > performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the > derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the > value-range-propagation pass I read about on this list some time ago) > but even more I am

You might wish to read this thread as well, for some backround on LLVM IR. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-October/043719.html Summary: LLVM IR is target specific, not portable between different targets. LLVM IR is actually a Compiler IR and not a virtual machine language.

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 18 May 2007, Keith Whitwell wrote: >> I'm interested in understanding the extent of the assumptions which llvm >> makes about the types of hardware it is capable of targeting. > > Different pieces of the compiler make different assumptions. In > particular, the code generator we ship is good for targetting certain > classes of

All, We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so please read carefully. A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches and tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and tags that we really

Reed, Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project. It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure. Thanks, --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Apr 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > All, > > We are considering removing some

On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:30 -0500, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Reed, > > Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual > Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project. > It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure. Yes, we can do that. I'll add it to the conversion script. > > Thanks, > >

Hi, I am curious about if the current LLVM implementation can handle Linux kernel (or any particular version of Linux kernel). The first question I have is that, how to create LLVM bytecode of Linux kernel using LLVM gcc frontend. What changes should I make to the compiling process Linux kernel? Secondly, is it possible to compile the assembly code in Linux kernel into LLVM bytecode? I noticed