similar to: [LLVMdev] [3.4 Release] Phase II Reminder

Just a reminder, LLVM 3.4 will be branching tomorrow: Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC All new features should be near finished. :-) Now, this doesn’t mean that that’s the last time code can be checked into the branch. However, it is the last time code can be checked in without approval by the code owner. Please please please keep on

Hi Developers, This is to clarify which patches may be merged into the 3.5 branch. * All doc changes may go in. In fact, you’re encouraged to update the branch's ReleaseNotes.rst file! :-) * All non-documentation patches should first receive approval from the appropriate code maintainer. (A blanket approval is acceptable for the first phase of testing.) * If your patch fixes a major bug,

Hello LLVMers! It's that time of year for a new release of LLVM! Time sure has flown. It seems like only 4 months ago we released LLVM 3.3. :-) Anyway, here is the current plan of action: * We will branch on Monday, November 18th at 7PM PST (November 19th at 3AM GMT). * This gives us a tentative release date of December 23rd...Just in time for Christmas! :-) I'm scheduling it for the

Bill, et al., There are still a number of open bug reports demonstrating miscompiles on x86 with small/reduced test cases. I propose that we either delay this release until these have been fixed, or plan on a point release in the near future. I recommend that we put out another two release candidates, one at the end of this week, and one after another two weeks or so, to allow for these

That’s a long laundry list of bugs there. It would be great to have them fixed, but the reality of the situation is that they won’t be fixed for weeks or more, if at all. And with Christmas coming up, it makes things even worse. There are a few days before Phase III starts to have some progress on them. But if they don’t make it, then we’ll have to release without them. -bw On Dec 12, 2013, at

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 06:11:16AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > > Good day! > > > > This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at > this time: > > > > Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November > 19, 2013 at 3:00:00

This is just a reminder that the 3.5 release will be starting up in July. Most likely the 2nd week. Details will come later. But you can help things along. * Be sure to update the READMEs! * Try to get your new features in good working condition. * Tackle some of the bugs in the bugzilla. Focus on mis-compilations. * And update the READMEs!! Share and enjoy! -bw

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 06:11:16AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > Good day! > > This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at this time: > > Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC > > What this means for you! > ------------------------ > > * Please keep the release notes up to date --

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:59:25PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Jack, > > Where do the "-isysroot > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk > -mmacosx-version-min=10.8" flags come from? I don't see them in your > CMake invocation - perhaps they're added via $CC or $CFLAGS? Is this > being done

Am 2018-02-07 21:51, schrieb Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev: > Dear testers, > > There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in > a better state now. > > 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. > > Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries. Hi Hans, I can't build the documentation:

Hi developers! We are at that time of year again where we need to think about Santa Claus, parties with friends, and the LLVM next release. :-) There isn’t a schedule yet, but I would like to begin things the week after the developers meeting, which should be pretty awesome and I can’t wait!! (This explains why I’ve been on a tear to fix / close out the PRs.) What this means for you: * Please

Jack, Where do the "-isysroot /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.8" flags come from? I don't see them in your CMake invocation - perhaps they're added via $CC or $CFLAGS? Is this being done on purpose? I can add a CMake step checking whether the current CFLAGS/LDFLAGS allow to build an

Good news, everyone! Phase I of LLVM testing is now finished! You can find binaries here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.4/rc1/ Please take some time to download and use those binaries. There have been several bugs that have cropped up in the meantime. We need to get these fixed for the release. Please help out if you can! Here are a few bugs that seem pretty bad: *

Good day! This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at this time: Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC What this means for you! ------------------------ * Please keep the release notes up to date -- There has been very few commits to them. Please be proactive and update them with any significant feature that was

The LLVM 3.4 branches are now frozen. We’re only accepting major, super horrible bug fixes from now on. The testers are going to do a third phase of testing, but it’s mostly to verify that we don’t have any major problems left. Share and enjoy! -bw

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > That's really cool! Should we add note to Release Notes? Definitely. I will add a note mentioning about this in ReleaseNotes.rst. > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju > <venkatra at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: >> Thanks to Jakob's work on Sparcv9 ABI in

Anton, Seems release_34 is orphan in llvm.git and clang.git. Could you tweak them? 2013/11/19 Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com>: > We have officially branched for the LLVM 3.4 release!! > > This means that we are now in the middle of a feature freeze. Here’s what will happen over the next several weeks: > > * Nov 19 - Nov 24: This is Phase I testing. During this time,

Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January. Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty empty. Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know. Cheers, Hans 1. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html 2.

We have officially branched for the LLVM 3.4 release!! This means that we are now in the middle of a feature freeze. Here’s what will happen over the next several weeks: * Nov 19 - Nov 24: This is Phase I testing. During this time, you are still able to add code to the release branch. However, you will need to have the approval of the code owner before committing it. We are mostly looking for

+Bob Wilson I don't know if this is a recent Apple regression, or if it's now catching something which had always been invalid. -bw On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:46:47PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > > > This