similar to: [LLVMdev] [Announcement] LLVM 3.4

On 1 Apr 2013, at 22:05, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > • MacOS X (x86) > • Linux (Ubuntu - x86) > • FreeBSD (x86) > • Windows (experimentally) > > We would like to support ARM again. Also, there has been significant improvements on other platforms. The only thing keeping us from releasing binaries for non-Intel platforms is a phalanx of testers for those

It is very exciting to see experimental Windows support listed for 3.3. Is there documentation somewhere that tracks what works and what doesn't in this configuration, particularly for C++?. Otherwise it is difficult for those not actively involved in developing Windows support to know what to expect when experimenting. Thanks, Andrew On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Bill Wendling

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:24:13AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 1 Apr 2013, at 22:05, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > > > • MacOS X (x86) > > • Linux (Ubuntu - x86) > > • FreeBSD (x86) > > • Windows (experimentally) > > > > We would like to support ARM again. Also, there has been significant improvements on other platforms. The

Happy April! [Contrary to the day, this is not an April Fool's joke. ;-)] It has been several months since the release of Clang 3.2. Now is the time to start thinking about the next release! The (very) tentative schedule is testing in May and a release in June. What This Means For You Now is the time to start thinking about which features you are currently working on and getting them

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 06:11:16AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > > Good day! > > > > This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at > this time: > > > > Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November > 19, 2013 at 3:00:00

Good day! This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at this time: Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC What this means for you! ------------------------ * Please keep the release notes up to date -- There has been very few commits to them. Please be proactive and update them with any significant feature that was

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 06:11:16AM -0800, Bill Wendling wrote: > Good day! > > This is just a reminder that branching for the 3.4 release will occur at this time: > > Monday, November 18, 2013 at 7:00:00 PM PST / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 at 3:00:00 AM UTC > > What this means for you! > ------------------------ > > * Please keep the release notes up to date --

Hi all, Mango have released their updated training schedule which includes new courses and new locations. Hadley Wickham will also be coming to London to teach Data Visualisation in R. Please see details below: Public Courses Our public courses include introductory to advanced training in general data analysis through to industry specific data analysis. Attendees of our public courses receive

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:59:25PM +0400, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Jack, > > Where do the "-isysroot > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk > -mmacosx-version-min=10.8" flags come from? I don't see them in your > CMake invocation - perhaps they're added via $CC or $CFLAGS? Is this > being done

Hi LLVM-ites! I wanted to give you a "heads up" on the 3.3 release schedule. Branching [Important] --------------------- We will be branching for the 3.3 release one Monday, May 6th at 5PM PDT (Tuesday, May 7th 12:00 midnight GMT). Tentative Schedule ------------------ The remaining schedule will follow the normal test - bug fix - repeat process: May 6th - 11th --- Phase I

Jack, Where do the "-isysroot /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.8" flags come from? I don't see them in your CMake invocation - perhaps they're added via $CC or $CFLAGS? Is this being done on purpose? I can add a CMake step checking whether the current CFLAGS/LDFLAGS allow to build an

Hi- I'm wondering if anyone can help me with my code. I'm coming up dry when I try to get a p-value from the following code. If I make a histogram of my resampled distribution, I find the difference between by groups to be significant. I've ranked the data since I have outliers in one of my groups. mange= c(35, 60, 81, 158, 89, 130, 90, 38, 119, 137, 52, 30, 27,

Hi, I'm having difficulty with getting a table to show with multiple rows and columns. Below is the commands that I've typed in and errors that I am getting. Thank you. Laura Table trying to enter: Diet: Binger-yes: Binger-No: Total: None 24 134 158 Healthy 9 52 61 Unhealthy 23 72 95 Dangerous 12 15 27 >

SambaXP 2020 - Online Edition The 19th International Conference for the open source software Samba will take place from 26th - 28th May 2020 as an *free* online event. The planned IO-Lab is cancelled. SambaXP is the annual meeting of the international Samba team with developers, users, manufacturers and system integrators within the Samba ecosystem, which has been held since 2002. Due to the

Hi all , I have a dataframe (Hypertension) with following headers :- > Hypertension ID Hypertension(before drug A) Hypertension(On drug A) On drug B? Healthy diet? 1 160 90 True True 2 190

Hello The time as come to drink some beer and talk about our one true love :) Just as a reminder that tonight is the CentOS Beer event in Berlin. More details can be found under [1] I hope a lot of people will be coming, I have flown in loads of goodies to give away. Cheers Didi [1] http://wiki.centos.org/Events/BeerEvent ---- My www page: www.ribalba.de Email / Jabber: ribalba at gmail.com

Hi all! My question is why, and what I can do about that I sometimes, but not always, get warning-messages like nlminb returned message singular convergence (7) in: LMEopt(x = mer, value = cv) or IRLS iterations for PQL did not converge when trying to fit a model looking like this: lmer<-(cbind(Diseased,Healthy)~Fungus+(1|Family)+(1|Fungus:Family), family="binomial") to four

For some reason rake spec is totally crapping out on me. I don''t know what I did to make it break, the only thing I tried new was install haml, but even after removing it there is still a stack trace. Here is what I am getting- sparta at phalanx ff $ rake spec (in /Users/sparta/Projects/work/idastudios/ff)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm trying to bring up a three node cluster using CTDB and SAMBA4 on a GlusterFS clustered file system. The filesystem itself seems to be working just fine, but CTDB doesn't seem happy. If I start a single node up: service ctdb start After about 10 seconds it becomes healthy, starts SAMBA and takes over all 3 IP addresses. However,

On 23/08/15 17:10, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > After years of delays and side trips, I really am going to dive in and > build my own Samba server. And I have a few questions. > > All of my servers will be ARM. The main hardware will be Cubieboards > (2 and truck). They will be running Centos-7 once the development is > finished. For now I am using Fedora 22 arm. My backup