Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt"
2013 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
You are calling the option -auto-profile in some places and
-fauto-profile in others. Maybe it is just a typo?
On 1 October 2013 15:31, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to add a new option to clang to enable my auto profile
> pass. I've added this to Options.td and Driver/Tools.cpp, but I'm not
> getting the option -auto-profile in cc1's
2013 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Rafael Espíndola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> You are calling the option -auto-profile in some places and
> -fauto-profile in others. Maybe it is just a typo?
In opt, the option is named '-auto-profile' when I instantiate the pass:
INITIALIZE_PASS(AutoProfile, "auto-profile", "Auto Profile loader", false,
2011 Jul 26
3
a question about glht function
Hi all:
There's a question about glht function.
My data:data_ori,which inclue CD4, GROUP,time.
f_GROUP<-factor(data_ori$GROUP)
f_GROUP is a factor of 3 levels(0,1,2,3)
result <- lme(sqrt(CD4) ~ f_GROUP*time ,random = ~time|ID,data=data_ori)
glht(result, linfct = mcp(f_GROUP="Tukey") )
Error in `[.data.frame`(mf, nhypo[checknm]) : undefined columns selected
I can't
2013 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
The option handling in clang in fairly different from opt. The comment
about the mixed name was just a guess as to why you don't see the
driver passing it down to -cc1.
Once that is working, you will probably need to:
* Patch ParseCodeGenArgs to record the option
* Patch EmitAssemblyHelper::CreatePasses to set the option to enable
the pass in the pass manager (assuming that is the effect
2015 Jun 05
2
[LLVMdev] Removing AvailableExternal values in GlobalDCE (was Re: RFC: ThinLTO Impementation Plan)
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Agreed. Although I assume you mean invoke the new pass under a
>> ThinLTO-only option so that avail extern are not dropped in the
>> compile pass before the LTO link?
>
>
> No, this pass
2015 Jun 04
5
[LLVMdev] Removing AvailableExternal values in GlobalDCE (was Re: RFC: ThinLTO Impementation Plan)
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
>
> > Personally, I think the right approach is to add a bool to
> createGlobalDCEPass defaulting to true named something like
> IsAfterInlining. In most standard pass pipelines, GlobalDCE runs after
> inlining for obvious reasons, so the default makes sense. The special case
> is
2015 Jun 08
2
[LLVMdev] Removing AvailableExternal values in GlobalDCE (was Re: RFC: ThinLTO Impementation Plan)
Talked to Eric Fri and he suggested that this might be the first of
several places where we want behavior of LTO compiles to diverge from
normal -O2 compiles. So for now I have implemented this such that we
pass down -flto to the -cc1 job, and that gets propagated as a code
gen option and into the PassManagerBuilder. I have left the current
logic translating -flto to the -emit-llvm-bc option,
2013 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Rafael Espíndola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> The option handling in clang in fairly different from opt. The comment
> about the mixed name was just a guess as to why you don't see the
> driver passing it down to -cc1.
Clang::ConstructJob is ~2k lines long. I was putting the handling of
this option too far down. I moved it up and
2013 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Rafael Espíndola
> <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The option handling in clang in fairly different from opt. The comment
>> about the mixed name was just a guess as to why you don't see the
>> driver passing it down to -cc1.
>
>
2006 Dec 03
1
Samba permissions error and other odd behaviour (RFH)
Hi, can anybody help me with the following please:-
I've have just migrated to a new server (old FC5, new FC6). I have migrated
my samba config from the old box.
As far as I can see, the config is correct (I hardly changed anything), but
samba logs a "/mnt/share" permission denied error when I try to connect.
When I changed the path of the share to "/tmp/share" it
2011 Nov 29
1
RFH: Corruption with blktap2 on Debian 2.6.32-39 + xen-4.1.2
Hello,
I have observed several strange blktap2(?) corruption problems using Xen-4.1.2
on several 2.6.32-39 based amd64 Linux Systems. I run an installation of a
domain, which use 3 blktap2 devices: 2× 20 GiB hard disk image files and 1×
1.1 GiB DVD iso file. During installation processes start to SEGV, which
aborts the installation.
* Not all processes in domU segfault in each
run:
2000 Mar 25
3
RFH -> Request for Help.
Hello all,
I've been playing with tinc to setup a wan between two offices of the
company that I work for. I'm partially there but having a slight problem.
tinc comes up between the 2 machines (both 2.2.14 debian woody
machines), and I can ping from the vpn machine at office a, and get a
response from office b. However, if I ping any other machine across the
wan I can't get a
2015 Jun 17
4
[LLVMdev] RFC - Stop ignoring -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
On 2015 Jun 17, at 13:53, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote:
> The flags -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use are currently ignored
> for GCC compatibility. I would like to enable them and give them
> similar semantics to GCC. These flags are baked pretty deeply into
> our build environment, so supporting them at the driver level will
> make our lives a lot
2012 Oct 27
8
RFH: loopback & blktap(2) and CDROM
Hello,
I''m currently trying to understand some problems I had in the past with mixing
look-back with blktap(2) for HV and PV domains. I''m stuck reading the source
code, so I''d like to get some help from the list. Interrupt me if I got
something fundamentally wrong in my understanding so far:
1. With pure-HV the domU gets an emulated IDE (or whatever) disk. The
2008 Feb 15
4
Revised flags patch
Hi,
first of all, sorry for taking so long. Unfortunately, some other tasks
kept coming up. Anyway, attached is the version of the flags patch, that
is based on the one I'm using with 2.6.9. It is against the rsync-3.0.0pre9
release.
I've included the option name change from the repository, so the
option is now called --fileflags. Improved from the previously
distributed version is the
2014 Nov 03
8
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Protection against stack-based memory corruption errors using SafeStack
Dear LLVM developers,
Our team has developed an LLVM-based protection mechanism that (i) prevents
control-flow hijack attacks enabled by memory corruption errors and (ii)
has very low performance overhead. We would like to contribute the
implementation to LLVM. We presented this work at the OSDI 2014 conference,
at several software companies, and several US universities. We received
positive
2013 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt (Clang patch)
Clang patch for X32 support. Applies against current trunk.
--- ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td.orig 2013-05-16
21:51:51.286129820 +0000
+++ ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td 2013-05-16
21:53:24.875004239 +0000
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@
HelpText<"Enable hexagon-qdsp6 backward compatibility">;
def m3dnowa : Flag<["-"], "m3dnowa">,
2013 Aug 22
7
[LLVMdev] [RFC PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt
Hi,
I'm working on bringing up complete coverage for a Gentoo x32 "desktop"
system. I've been cooking up quite a few patches for various packages
to push upstream, but right now, the biggest blocker is the lack of
support for building with/codegen targeting x32 in llvm/clang. Since
the x32 patches were sent last year, I see support code has landed in
LLVM, and basic handling of
2013 Aug 22
3
[LLVMdev] [NEW PATCH] X32 ABI support for Clang/compiler-rt (Clang patch)
This patch is still not creating elf32_x86_64 objects. No idea
why. :( It does however, fix elf_x86_64 (-m64) code generation on x32
hosts which is nice. :)
--- ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td.orig 2013-05-16
21:51:51.286129820 +0000
+++ ./tools/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td 2013-05-16
21:53:24.875004239 +0000
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@
HelpText<"Enable hexagon-qdsp6
2005 Sep 24
0
Software to generate an SRTP key pair?
I have been looking all over for software to generate the keys needed
to have secure calls with my Sipura. The only one that I have found is
on-line and thus not so secure:
http://voxilla.com/certrequest.php
Any pointers?
Thx,
-RFH