similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3.1 Release Plans

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:17:02PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > The number of stable patches has slowed down in the last few weeks, and > we are approaching the halfway point between 3.3 and 3.4, so I think now > is a good time to start planning for the 3.3.1 release. Here is the > tentative schedule: > > September 3: 3.3.1-rc1 > - This won't actually be

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:02:58PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:17:02PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The number of stable patches has slowed down in the last few weeks, and > > we are approaching the halfway point between 3.3 and 3.4, so I think now > > is a good time to start planning for the 3.3.1 release. Here is the

Hi, I've tagged 6.0.1-rc3, which should be the last rc release. If every thing goes well, 6.0.1-final will be next Thursday. Testers please test 6.0.1-rc3 and upload the results. -Tom

Hi, I've just tagged 7.0.1-rc3. This will hopefully be the last release candidate. Please test and report results. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 8.0.1-rc3. Testers, please begin testing and report results. -Tom

Hi, I have tagged 3.9.1-rc3. The only differences from -rc2 were a few bug fixes for ARM/AARCH64, so if you aren't testing either of these I think it's safe to take this -rc off and what for -final. I'm hoping to do -final next week after I get the ARM test results. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I've just tagged 5.0.1-rc3, please test and report the results. Hopefully, this will be the last RC and the final release will be next week. -Tom

Hi, I would like to begin the 3.4.2 release process for LLVM. There have been two issues identified in 3.4.1, which there is interest in having fixed in a 3.4.x release: 1. Build failure with gcc 4.9 (This is not a regression, 3.4 also fails to build with gcc 4.9). 2. Accidental change of libLLVM's DT_SONAME from libLLVM-3.4 libLLVM-3.4.1.so I will also accept any other bug-fixes that

Hi, I've created the 3.9.1-final tag no changes from -rc3. Testers can begin uploading binaries now. -Tom

Hi, I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can begin testing. -Tom

Hi, I've tagged 10.0.1-rc4, please test and report the results. -Tom

Hi, I've just tagged 3.5.1-rc2, so testing can begin. Remember to use the 3.5 branch of the test-suite. If you have any questions, let me know. -Tom

Hi, I've tagged the 8.0.1-rc2 release, testers please begin testing and upload your binaries. There are still a few more bug fixes that I need to merge, so I'm planning to do one more release candidate before 8.0.1-final. -Tom

Hi, I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The current process is documented here: https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html There are two parts to this proposal. The first is a list of clarifications, which are things we are currently doing that aren't documented. The second is a list of changes which would actually modify how releases are currently managed.

Hi, A few months ago, I mentioned I was interested in helping to make dot releases for LLVM 3.3. Now that 3.3 has been released, I would like to kick off the process of collecting bug fixes and merging them into the 3.3 branch. I reviewed the previous discussion about dot releases: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/060821.html and I've come up with the following dot

On 06/05/2018 10:47 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 4 Jun 2018, at 18:01, Tom Stellard via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The 6.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged. Testers may begin testing and >> reporting results. > > Built for FreeBSD 10, tested and uploaded: > > SHA256 (clang+llvm-6.0.1-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz)

On 03/29/2018 08:09 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can > begin testing. > So far, I've only received 5.0.2-rc2 binaries from 2 testers. I am guessing this is due to the mix up with -rc1 and the fact that we don't normally do X.Y.2 releases. If you would like to test this release

Hi, I just tagged 3.9.1-rc2, so testing can begin. There was a bug found in -rc1 before I could send out a release announcement, so I decided to merge the fix and tag -rc2 to save some testing cycles. We can always use more testers, so if you are interested in helping, let me know. Thanks, Tom

Hi, We don't normally do X.Y.2 releases, but there has been some interest in getting a 5.0.2 release out with the Spectre mitigations included, so I am proposing the following schedule for a 5.0.2 release: LLVM 5.0.2 -rc1 Mon Mar 19 -final Mon Mar 26 To keep things easy for testers, 5.0.2 will be for Spectre related fixes only and won't be opened up for general bugs. And here is

Hello testers, Start your engines, RC3 has just been tagged (at r229050 on the branch). If this one looks good, it will become the release. There has been quite a bit of activity on the branch since RC2; let's hope it's all goodness :-) Please let me know how it looks, and upload binaries to the sftp as usual. Thanks for all your efforts so far! - Hans