similar to: [LLVMdev] Stack usage analysis using LLVM

On 9/3/13 1:27 PM, Snehasish Kumar wrote: > Hi > > I was wondering if someone knows about any effort within the LLVM > community to perform stack usage analysis per function similar to > GCC's "-fstack-usage > <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn_unw/Static-Stack-Usage-Analysis.html>" > option? I am not familiar with the -fstack-usage option in GCC,

Hi Preston, Thank you for the prompt response. You can use DependenceAnalysis to get the info you want by expensively > testing all pairs of memory references. Isn't all pairs testing incorrect in the sense that a pair may only exist for a certain path? Consider the following example. A[i] = 42; // S1 if( condition ) // C1 { A[i] = 20; // S2 } B[i] = A[i];

Hi Snehasish, thanks for writing up the proposal. As it stands today, path profiling still has serious scalability issue that prevents it from being usable by any optimization passes that may benefit from it. On the other hand, sampling based approach can still be promising. For instance, LBR can potentially together with static CFG constructed from the binary can be used to form path(let)

Hi I want to analyse the memory dependencies which exist in a loop at an intra iteration as well as inter iteration (loop carried dependencies). I looked at the DependenceAnalysis implementation which returns a lot of the information I require (based on a prior AliasAnalysis pass), however I need to pass the Src and Dst instructions in program order. I was wondering how I can collect all the

Hi David, > Are the data below all collected when only one function is picked for > instrumentation? Yes, here is a list of the benchmarks and selected functions. +-----------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | blks | _Z19BlkSchlsEqEuroNoDivfffffif |

Hi David, > Hi Snehasish, thanks for writing up the proposal. > > As it stands today, path profiling still has serious scalability issue that > prevents it from being usable by any optimization passes that may benefit > from it. I agree; it would be an interesting to see how we can reduce the overheads to bring it within acceptable limits. > It will be interesting to see how

Hi I am pinging to find out if there is any interest to mentor this proposal for GSoC this year? I've submitted a draft via the GSoC website. David, Vedant it would be great if I could get some advice on refining the goals and particulars of the implementation. The version we use internally is not performance oriented and will require refactoring. Here is a link to the draft document [1].

Tried that just now, same result. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Snehasish Kumar <kumar.snehasish at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Russel, > > Can you try compiling aklo.o using -fno-rtti prior to linking? > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Russell Wallace via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to link a program with LLVM on Linux.

Hello, I'm trying to get the pointer to the first element of a string (so that I can pass it to a function). The string itself is a constant kept in a global variable. My end goal is to generate the IR for something like "puts("Hello World")"; I'm stuck on the parameter part of the call instruction. So far I have something like this: const std::string& str =

Yeah, seems to. a at a-VirtualBox:~$ nm /home/a/build//lib/libLLVMSupport.a | grep ZN4llvm4outsEv U _ZN4llvm4outsEv U _ZN4llvm4outsEv 0000000000000000 b _ZGVZN4llvm4outsEvE1S 0000000000000000 T _ZN4llvm4outsEv 0000000000000000 r _ZZN4llvm4outsEvE19__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ 0000000000000000 b _ZZN4llvm4outsEvE1S U _ZN4llvm4outsEv I can try building

Hi All, Users have contacted me because they can not build MCMCglmm from source. All are using R 3.3.0 on various machines with different compilers gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2) 5.4.0 g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 Mac OS X El Capitan (version/compiler unspecified) The issue seems to be with mixing C/C++ with the repeated error: /usr/include/c++/5/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:118:3:

This looks like the result of including a C++ system header inside an extern "C" block. There is no evidence of this happening in the current version 2.22.1. However, it did happen in the previous version 2.22 via the chain of inclusions: MCMCglmmcc.h -> cs.h -> R.h -> various C++ system headers See Writing R Extensions P 108. I would check that the people reporting this bug

Hello, Does the -fstack-protector option work on CLANG 3.1 and 3.2? There is thread on FreeBSD forums about the stack protector and ports and I'm wondering if it's possible to use the -fstack-protector option with CLANG. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36927 -Kimmo

Hi, I ran R (version 2.9.0) CMD build under root in Fedora (9). When it tried to remove "junk files" it removed EVERYTHING in my local account! (See below). Can anyone tell me what happened, and even more importantly if I can I restore what was lost. Panickingly, Jarrod [jarrod at localhost AManal]$ R CMD build MCMCglmm_2.05 * checking for file

Hi, I ran R (version 2.9.0) CMD build under root in Fedora (9). When it tried to remove "junk files" it removed EVERYTHING in my local account! (See below). Can anyone tell me what happened, and even more importantly if I can I restore what was lost. Panickingly, Jarrod [jarrod at localhost AManal]$ R CMD build MCMCglmm_2.05 * checking for file

Hi, I ran R (version 2.9.0) CMD build under root in Fedora (9). When it tried to remove "junk files" it removed EVERYTHING in my local account! (See below). Can anyone tell me what happened, and even more importantly if I can I restore what was lost. Panickingly, Jarrod [jarrod at localhost AManal]$ R CMD build MCMCglmm_2.05 * checking for file 'MCMCglmm_2.05/DESCRIPTION'

Hi, <This issue was previously posted in R-help, but advised to post here as a more relevant group> I was trying to install RQuantLib in my Ubuntu machine which failed with below information : *> install.packages('RQuantLib', repos='http://cran.rstudio.com/ <http://cran.rstudio.com/>', INSTALL_opts = c('--no-lock'))* *Installing package into

Does anybody know why two "-g" flags appear in the call to gcc in R CMD SHLIB Example: gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -fpic *-g* -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 *-g* -c c_file1.c -o c_object1.o Surely it need only be listed once? Alan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I am getting a fresh CentOS 6.7 machine set up with all of the goodies for R 3.2.3, including dplyr package. I am unable to successfully install it. Below I show the failed installation using utils::install.packages() and then again using devtools::install_github(). Each yields an error similar to the other but not quite exactly the same - the error messages sail right over my head. I

Dear All, I am building R from source[1], following what is done in "rules" for building Debian's R. But the R I generate, in contrast to the standard Debian's R, will not change the BLAS and LAPACK libraries it uses when I change them via "update-alternatives". I have no idea what I am doing wrong (but, somehow, I've been quite capable of making the same