similar to: Updates for Cluster Suite 4?

Announcing CentOS 3 i386 Cluster Suite (CS) and Global File System (GFS) CentOS csgfs is now available for CentOS-3 i386. This is a built from source found here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/3/en/RHCS/i386/SRPMS/ ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/3/en/RHGFS/i386/SRPMS/ ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/3AS/en/RHCS/SRPMS/

I recently bought a new Compaq Presario sr1710nx with 64-bit Sempron and last week installed Centos 4.3 64-bit on it. Worked like a champ until I attempted a reboot (using "init 6") and the computer hung after finishing the shutdown. Rebooting from cold worked, but without a warm reboot I was hesitant to use Centos. Since FC5 (64-bit as well) came out recently, I tried it and

So what does everyone else think of Oracle's announcement? http:// developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/25/2316221 I kind of think that they are going to be hurting RedHat (a valuable partner if you believe their deployment numbers). Oh silly, silly Larry. I guess the only hope that we have is that it actually increases mind share of RHEL and hence broader support for it (and

Since RHEL 6.3 has been released, I have removed the RHEL 6.3 preview repository (the one located at people.redhat.com/~rjones). If you added this as a yum repo, you can remove it and things should continue to work. The official, cryptographically-signed source RPM is located here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/libguestfs-1.16.19-1.el6.src.rpm (keys:

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:27 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > I am using llvm-2.6  and the ConstProp.cpp file is > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html > > and the exact error message is: > > llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build  (PIC) >

I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html and the exact error message is: llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build (PIC) /home/tarun/Desktop/compiler/LLVM/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h: In member function ‘virtual bool<unnamed>::ConstantPropagation::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)’:

Hi While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error. error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant* llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction( llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const llvm::TargetData*) I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html and the exact error message is: llvm[0]: Compiling

Dear Tarun, It just occurred to me that this may or may not be what you are asking about. This only finds basic blocks along the def-use chain of an instruction; it does not find all basic blocks along all paths between two instructions. I don't know of an algorithm off-hand for the latter, but if you understand how to iterate over def-use chains and the control-flow graph, then

On 4/16/11 7:01 PM, tarun agrawal wrote: > The clone llvm:CloneBasicBlock copies the phi function in the > replicated basic block from the original basic block. After you clone the basic block, you can probably replace the phi instruction with another value of your choice. If you're adding variables, you'll probably want to create them as allocas and use loads and stores to

On 5/3/11 4:08 PM, tarun agrawal wrote: > HI > > I know it is a very simple question not worth asking here but I am > really struggling pls help me out.. This is a question worth asking; it's just that not everyone can answer all the time. :) If all you want to do is to follow the SSA def-use chain within a single function, then this is very easy. All you have to do is use

HI I know it is a very simple question not worth asking here but I am really struggling pls help me out.. On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:10 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I need to get all the basic blocks that are there, in the path from > definition of an instruction to use of that instruction. > > > Regards > Tarun > --------------

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:44 AM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using alias analysis to determine whether two values are alias or not. > But I am not able to figure out the algorithm that is being used to > determine > May , Must and No Alias. Here is the algorithm in high-level: http://llvm.org/docs/AliasAnalysis.html#exist > > >

Thanks John, I know how to iterate through def-use chains and I also have realized the need for an algorithm to do the work. But the algorithm I am able to figure out is not linear in time. It wold be a great help if someone suggest me a way to get all basic-block along all path between two instruction. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:00 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: >

Dear Tarun, Swarup Sahoo and I wrote some LLVM passes for dynamic slicing for LLVM 2.6. I believe we had planned to make the code publicly available as part of the Giri project (http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/giri/trunk), but due to other commitments, we have not moved the code into that SVN repository yet. Let me check with Vikram and Swarup to see about getting a copy of the code to you.

Just to be clear, I have to add a function name printf in the module with no body. And I can call the function. This will automatically call the printf function which is defined in the library. Tarun Agrawal On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:34 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 2/8/12 11:55 AM, tarun agrawal wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to insert a

Hi, I am not able to find the documentation on SPEDI. Or the source code for the project. Thanks and Regards, Tarun. On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:24 PM, girish gulawani <girishvg at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hello Tarun. > You mean SPEDI? > http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/2003-Fall-CS497YYZ-SPEDI.pdf > > Regards, > Girish. > > *From:* tarun agrawal <tarun

Hi, I'm using RPMs from http://www.laimbock.com/asterisk/ and they works well (thanks to the author!). They include some patches to provide additional functionalities. Now I'm trying to re-create the original compiling environment to recompile some other apps (app_pickup2, app_ldap, etc) and I downloaded SRPMs. Does anyone know if Asterisk tarball included in SRPMs already contains patch

The clone llvm:CloneBasicBlock copies the phi function in the replicated basic block from the original basic block. I don't want the copy of phi in relplicated block. For now I am creating .bc file with -O0 option so that it doesn't generate phi function in first place. Is this a good approach or there are some other function available for it. Tarun On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Eli

Greetings list, It's been a while since I've been able to focus on asterisk packaging but this weekend I took some time to audit and recompile packages for CentOS 4.2. You can find them here. ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/ftp/pub/releases/CentOS-4.0 You have your choice of 1.2.1 or 1.0.10 releases. If you need zaptel modules then install this kernel as well:

Hello, In order to overcome a known performance bug in perl-5.8.8-10 in centos 5 (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196836) I downloaded the perl package from fedora 8 (http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/fedora/linux/releases/8/Fedora/source/SRPMS/perl-5.8.8-30.fc8.src.rpm) and mod_perl