similar to: [LLVMdev] libcxx support library

Since the original buildit script doesn't cover my needs I switched to a custom but really similar script, in the meantime I also got the habit to dig for new flags and support and the __GLIBCXX__ define was hiding some of this errors. I see that other linux-based operating system offer this kind of support and they even use the same core components of my GNU/Linux distribution. You are

On 28 Jul 2016, at 08:59, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2016 8:36 a.m., "David Chisnall via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > This does not apply to libc++. We support building the entire LLVM suite with other C++ standard library implementations (at least libstdc++, and I think also with Visual Studio’s

On 28 July 2016 at 09:42, David Chisnall <david.chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > I think it’s important to differentiate between ‘needs’ as in ‘requires a precisely matched version’ and ‘needs’ as in ‘requires something to provide this functionality’. Clang needs something equivalent to libc++ and something equivalent to libunwind, but it doesn’t (or, at least, shouldn’t) need a

On 5 Jun 2017, at 15:17, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 6/5/17 5:17 AM, Dmitry Golovin via llvm-dev wrote: >> I'm trying to build LLVM, Clang, LLD, compiler-rt, libc++, libc++abi and libunwind with musl-based toolchain. >> >> The configuration is the following: >> >> LIBCXX_HAS_MUSL_LIBC=ON >>

On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:11, Dimitry Andric via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > ... >>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >>>

Hi, I'm under Ubuntu 13.10 amd64 I just compiled both my libcxx and my libcxxabi. I noticed this really weird behaviour, while trying to compile some C++11-compliant piece of code I get this error at runtime exception_ptr not yet implemented Aborted (core dumped) Now my experience tells me that this is something that can easily be related to the ABI, so I go to the official libcxxabi

Hello, I wanted to try the new c++ stuff, ie clang-3.2, libc++ and libcxxrt, so I used poudriere to build a jail setup for that ( WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=yes in src.conf, CXXFLAGS+=-stdlib=libc++ and libsupc++.so.1 libcxxrt.so.1 in libmap.conf ), and started to build my normal set of packages ( see desktop.list ). Please note that I also have WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and WITH_KMS=yes, as well as using the

On 28 Jul 2016 8:36 a.m., "David Chisnall via llvm-dev" < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > This does not apply to libc++. We support building the entire LLVM suite with other C++ standard library implementations (at least libstdc++, and I think also with Visual Studio’s implementation), so there is no dependency of anything on libc++. Similarly, we support building libc++

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:30, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >> >> On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:11, Dimitry Andric via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>

On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:30, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:11, Dimitry Andric via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>

I noticed a problem with llvm-config.exe on Windows: >"c:\Users\andy\llvm+clang-6.0.0rc2-win64-msvc-release\bin\llvm-config.exe" --system-libs psapi.lib shell32.lib ole32.lib uuid.lib But then when I link against LLVM and these libs, I get: lld: error: LLVMSupport.lib(Process.obj): undefined symbol: __imp_CryptAcquireContextW lld: error: LLVMSupport.lib(RandomNumberGenerator.obj):

On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: ... >> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a >> common root cause and do we have a bug for it? ... > The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to crash with: >

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > 2. We need to clarify how libstdc++ and libsupc++ can be used as > > libc++'s ABI library and explicitly define the level of support for > > these configurations. Are there any people using this functionality? > > These configurations have been broken for GCC >= 4.9.2 and I haven't

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 20 July 2015 at 10:41, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. >> Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using >> restructured text and not HTML.

Hi Eric, On 20 July 2015 at 10:41, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. > Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using > restructured text and not HTML. > > What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx builder and get > the required changes made for

Hi All, I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using restructured text and not HTML. What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx builder and get the required changes made for libcxx.llvm.org? /Eric

CC Tanya and ping. On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on rewriting libc++'s documentation using Sphinx. > Hopefully it will be easier to write and maintain documentation using > restructured text and not HTML. > > What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx builder and get > the required

On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > > [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), > and it works for me (tm). This is with libstdc++ providing the ABI > pieces, rather than libc++abi or libcxxrt, though.] libc++ "works" for us as well, but it can't self host. I don't know if your "works" and my definition of works is

If you're willing to install libc++ you can easily work around this by running `ninja install-cxx install-cxxabi` before running any of the LLVM or Clang build targets. /Eric On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Asiri Rathnayake > <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: >

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:21 AM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Ryan Prichard via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2. *Termination landing pads.* >> >> Clang sometimes uses a landing pad that calls __clang_call_terminate to >> terminate the program. GCC instead leaves a gap in