similar to: [LLVMdev] ldexp constant propagation

Hello, I'm running into problems while trying to build libvorbis. My build platform is Solaris 10 (sparc) (11/06) with GCC 3.4.6. The build fails with the following error : Making all in examples gmake[2]: Entering directory `/afs/cad.njit.edu/u/a/n/andym/ftp/freeware/multimedia/ogg/libvorbis-1.2.0/examples' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include

Hi all, I couldn't cross-compile NUT for uClibc x86_64 with shared libm, but the problem may show up with any other target as well. ldexp() requires "-lm" and most toolchains are happy without it, but picky ones aren't. This is a trivial patch to keep all linkers happy. Regards, diff -Naubr nut-2.7.2.old/drivers/Makefile.am nut-2.7.2.new/drivers/Makefile.am ---

> On Mar 6, 2018, at 4:25 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > >> On Mar 6, 2018, at 7:23 AM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> I need to review the last thread about undef/poison (or someone who knows current status of that can reply), but

Hello! I'm trying to compile decoder_example.c example (MS VC 7) using debug static ogg/vorbis libs with no luck. I got linker errors: Linking... MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR70D.dll) : error LNK2005: _malloc already defined in LIBCD.lib(dbgheap.obj) MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR70D.dll) : error LNK2005: _free already defined in LIBCD.lib(dbgheap.obj) MSVCRTD.lib(MSVCR70D.dll) : error LNK2005: _memmove already

> On Mar 6, 2018, at 7:23 AM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I need to review the last thread about undef/poison (or someone who knows current status of that can reply), but this would seem to come down to whether undef applies to the entire value or the individual bits? > Ie, in your example the sign bit will never be set unless all of the

Hi, I'm experiencing the following problem when runnig dovecot-1.0-test set up to authenticate users against openldap, while the corresponding setup with dovecot-0.99.11 works fine : . my platform : FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p1 . dovecot version : dovecot-1.0-test57 . openldap version : openldap-2.1.27 - Description : When I talk IMAP to the dovecot server, I can connect on port 143 and

At first glance, it looks like long double functions (such as fabsl and friends) are missing from your sysroot's <math.h>. Does your target support long double at all? -Dimitry > On 6 Feb 2018, at 09:51, Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have

Hello Dimitry and thanks for your answer. I am pretty sure it does indeed support long double. It's configured with vfpv3-d16 - but I noticed that c++config.h in gcc has _GLIBCXX__HAS_FABSL and friends are undefined. I think I need to look deeper at the configuration of our toolchain. long double support is required in libc++ then I gather? -- Tobias On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:47 AM,

Hi, In my llvm code I want to create some function calls. The function prototype is as follows: int memoize ( char *function_name, int *int_params, unsigned num_ints, double *double_params, unsigned num_doubles) In order to create these calls I do the following for example: %88 = alloca [7 x i8] store volatile [7 x i8] c"ORACLE\00", [7 x i8]*

Hello, I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have our own gcc compiler that we build with crosstools-ng (based on gcc 6.3.0) and I set my environment like this: CC=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-gcc CXX=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-g++ CFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a -Os -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 --sysroot=<path> CXXFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ali Javadi <aj14889 at yahoo.com> wrote: > I am keeping all the types of C, and adding my new types. I thought that, > for example, I can't map my new type to i32 because that's used for C > integers. That's what I meant by already used. Am I missing something? If the type behaves like an i32 then use i32. For example, both signed and

Hello, I am trying to cross-compile libc++ from my x86_64 linux system to armv7hf. We have our own gcc compiler that we build with crosstools-ng (based on gcc 6.3.0) and I set my environment like this: CC=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-gcc CXX=armv7a-plex-linux-gnueabihf-g++ CFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a -Os -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 --sysroot=<path> CXXFLAGS=-fPIC -DPIC

Stack colouring should be able to reuse the same stack space, if the live ranges of the pointers don't overlap. But I don't think anyone has built a general solution for alloca'd space. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Ali Javadi <aj14889 at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In my llvm code I want to create some function calls. The function > prototype is as follows: >

Hi Sean, >> Can I just utilize the i1 type? Is the >> i1 type already used for something, and thus might create a conflict? > > I think you are very confused. LLVM's types are meant to be used to > represent *your* program :) They can't be "already used". I am keeping all the types of C, and adding my new types. I thought that, for example, I can't map

Hello everybody, I need an help because I don´t know if the command for the ANOVA analysis I am performing in R is correct. Indeed using the function aov I get the following error:"In aov (......) Error() model is singular" The structure of my table is the following: subject, stimulus, condition, sex, response Example: subject stimulus condition sex response

Hi, I have some newly defined intrinsic functions in my llvm IR code, which I want to translate to X86 instruction set. As a first step, I want to be able to generate "nop" for these instructions, so the program at least compiles successfully. The call to my intrinsic function looks like this in the IR: call void @llvm.X(i16 %43) >From what I understand it may be possible to

Hi, In LLVM (using the opt tool), is it possible to force a nested loop be unrolled entirely? Something like a pass option? I have a nested loop with depth of 4, and all trip counts are known at compile time, but so far I've only been able to do this by 4 invocations of the -loop-simplify, -loop-rotate, -loop-unroll passes. Thanks, Ali

Hi there, I asked this a few days ago and Sean gave a useful answer. Going back to the second question below, I want to clarify something. On Feb 3, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ali Javadi <aj14889 at yahoo.com> wrote: >> I am keeping all the types of C, and adding my new types. I thought that, >> for

Hi, I am a newbie to the world of R. I have a data converted in csv format. Few cells in some of the rows of the data are blank ( in the sense that there is no value available for the particular experiment). When i try to open the file in R. I get an warning message. The specific warning message i get is {Warning message: NAs introduced by coercion } My data more or less looks like this -

Dear Sirs, I am using both the Bioconductor adds on (Affy, AffyPLM,...) and the 'standard' R-package. I am trying to select a list of genes which all have expression values below a certain threshold. I have done this by creating a vector which has 0s where the expression is greater than the threshold and 1s where it is less than or equal to it. Multiplying this vector by the expression