similar to: [LLVMdev] Adding a new ARM RegisterClass

Hi, I have a question about the definitions of t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE in ARMInstrThumb2.td : I was aware that the definitions of target RegisterClass (outs) are different in t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE. While t2LDRSB uses rGPR, t2LDRSB_PRE uses GPR. I wonder if lr and pc are already prevented from being allocated in pre-indexing case, because of some register hint that is being enforced?

Hi Junbum, > I was aware that the definitions of target RegisterClass (outs) are different in t2LDRSB and t2LDRSB_PRE. While t2LDRSB uses rGPR, t2LDRSB_PRE uses GPR. I wonder if lr and pc are already prevented from being allocated in pre-indexing case, because of some register hint that is being enforced? They're not allocated during CodeGen because of the Reserved.set(…) calls in

Hello, About a month ago, I submitted a set of patches for review on llvm-commit. The most controversial of the patches, http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150622/d104ea7 1/attachment-0009.obj deals with the fact that before ARMv8, the rGPR RegClass in Thumb encodings didn't include SP; but from ARMv8 onwards, it does include it. RegClass membership is

Thank you for the answer. What is the main reason of allowing this inconsistency in the td file? I guess that's because of the "some" distinction between the writeback and non-writeback versions. Is there any benefit from the inconsistency by using GRP in .td file and freezing lr and pc during register allocation in writeback version? Thanks, Junbum On May 23, 2013, at 11:51 AM,

Jim, Thanks for the hints. Does LLVM allow allocation of the same register across register classes? For example, in the ARM backend, can an instruction write to R0 when it is part of register class tGPR, but then use R0 in the next instruction as a source register from the rGPR class? If LLVM can do this, then this will work. Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Grosbach

Hi Micah, You can just create a new register class that only contains the registers you want and use that for the instruction. The set theoretic operators for register class definition make this very easy. See the ARM backend definitions of GPRnopc, rGPR, etc.. for examples. -Jim On Aug 16, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > Is there a way in tablegen to specify that a certain

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > All registers in my hardware are 4-element vector registers (128-bit). > Some are floating point registers, and the others are integer > registers. > > I typedef two packed classes: [4 x float] and [4 x int], and add an > enum 'packed' to MVT::ValueType (ValuesTypes.h). > > I declared all 'RegisterClass'es to be

Hi, everyone. I' have three set of registers - read-only regs, general purpose regs (read and write), and write-only regs. How should I partition them into different RegisterClasses so that I can easy define the instruction? All RegisterClasses must be mutally exclusive. That is, a register can only be in a RegisterClass. Otherwise TableGen will raise an error message. def

All registers in my hardware are 4-element vector registers (128-bit). Some are floating point registers, and the others are integer registers. I typedef two packed classes: [4 x float] and [4 x int], and add an enum 'packed' to MVT::ValueType (ValuesTypes.h). I declared all 'RegisterClass'es to be 'packed' (first argument of RegisterClass): def GeneralPurposeRC :

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > But please allow me to explain the hardware in detail. Hope there is > more elegant way to solve it. Sounds good! > The hardware is a "stream processor". That is, It processes samples > one by one. Each sample is associated with several 128-bit > four-element vector registers, namely: > > * input registers - the

The blow snippet in target.td shows the regList in RegisterClass is typed as dag. Why not make it a simple list, such as list<Register>? class RegisterClass<string namespace, list<ValueType> regTypes, int alignment, dag regList> Thanks, -Thomson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

2005/7/24, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > Ah, ok. In that case, you want to put all of the registers in one register > file, and not make the constant register allocatable (e.g. see > X86RegisterInfo.td, and note how the register classes include EBP and ESP, > but do not register allocate them (through the definition of > allocation_order_end()). > > -Chris

On Sat, 13 May 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: > I'm porting some existing code of mine to CVS HEAD, and don't understand > something about new RegisterClass TableGen definition: > > class RegisterClass<string namespace, list<ValueType> regTypes,........ > { > ..... > string Namespace = namespace; > > What is this "namespace"

Hi, I'm porting some existing code of mine to CVS HEAD, and don't understand something about new RegisterClass TableGen definition: class RegisterClass<string namespace, list<ValueType> regTypes,........ { ..... string Namespace = namespace; What is this "namespace" thing? It looks like it should contain the name of backend, right? // RegType

Thanks, I think it can solve my problem. But please allow me to explain the hardware in detail. Hope there is more elegant way to solve it. The hardware is a "stream processor". That is, It processes samples one by one. Each sample is associated with several 128-bit four-element vector registers, namely: * input registers - the attributes of the sample, the values of the registers

On 4/12/2018 8:01 AM, Dominique Torette via llvm-dev wrote: > > But there is one small issue in the inference of RegisterClass of the > implicitly defined register. > > As shown below, the %vreg6<def> is implicitly defined as FPUabRegisterClass. > > This register class accepts the v2f32 type, but for others addressing > mode context this register should be

On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:29:38AM +0800, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > I' have three set of registers - read-only regs, general purpose regs > (read and write), and write-only regs. How should I partition them > into different RegisterClasses so that I can easy define the > instruction? [snip] > def MOV : BinaryInst<2, (ops GeneralPurposeRegClass :$dest, >

Hi, I've come across a problem while working on an LLVM backend for a new target architecture. This architecture has two single-ported register files. Each instruction can only read one operand from each register file, but can write to either. I tried implementing it naïvely in TableGen with two definitions per instruction, so I had: def AllRegs : RegisterClass< ... (add interleave

when i use the RegisterClass(&WndClass); under wine the call fails. I'm using it to sub class the button class. Does wine not support this? Interdynamics Web Page : http://www.interdynamics.com

Hi All, I have a question about TableGen RegisterClass definition. I need to map different size of MVTs into a register class as below. def TestReg : RegisterClass<"Test", [v8i32, v4i32], ...> When I look at TableGen and CodeGen, it looks the types are used as following: 1. MCRegisterClass's RegSize and Alignment 2. SpillSize in TableGen 3. Type constraint for instruction