Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] polly tarball still missing for 3.2 release"
2012 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] missing polly 3.2 branch?
Bill,
> Hi Pawel,
>
> Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.).
Sure.
But I do not know much about polly so 'polly' guys please fill me on
the details. For the 3.2 release I will need:
- to know how to build it
seems to be covered here
2012 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] missing polly 3.2 branch?
Tobi,
It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night. Shouldn't there be
one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release?
Jack
2012 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] missing polly 3.2 branch?
On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <pawel at 32bitmicro.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>
>> Hi Pawel,
>>
>> Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.).
>
> Sure.
>
> But I do not know much about polly so 'polly' guys please
2012 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] missing polly 3.2 branch?
Hi Pawel,
Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.).
-bw
On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> Tobi,
> It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night. Shouldn't there be
> one now that polly
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> ...
>> Does attached patch work for you?
>>
>> Tobi
>>
>
> Tobi,
> Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test'
> without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly.
Thanks for
2013 Feb 10
3
[LLVMdev] -polly-codegen-isl
Tobi,
What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing
polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated
in 3.3?
Jack
2012 Oct 21
4
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 03:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> Does attached patch work for you?
>>>>
>>>> Tobi
>>>>
>>>
>>> Tobi,
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> ...
>>> Does attached patch work for you?
>>>
>>> Tobi
>>>
>>
>> Tobi,
>> Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make
2013 Feb 10
0
[LLVMdev] -polly-codegen-isl
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:23:59AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Tobi,
> What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing
> polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated
> in 3.3?
> Jack
Tobi,
Is it even possible to build polly without cloog at the moment or is the presence of
the -polly-codegen-isl
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
...
> Does attached patch work for you?
>
> Tobi
>
Tobi,
Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test'
without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly.
Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11?
Failing Tests (5):
2013 Jun 06
0
[LLVMdev] [POLLY] fix Bug 15817
On 06/05/2013 06:24 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:47:03AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:51:31PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 05/31/2013 01:09 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:59:52AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>>>> On 05/31/2013 10:11 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>> Duncan,
>>>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> Duncan,
>>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg
>>> using the documentation at
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>>>> Duncan,
>>>>> Is the documentation for using Polly
2012 Oct 21
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias
2012 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg polly support broken?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Duncan,
>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg
>> using the documentation at http://polly.llvm.org/example_load_Polly_into_dragonegg.html
>> with...
>>
>> GCC=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/bin/gcc-4
2013 Jun 05
2
[LLVMdev] [POLLY] fix Bug 15817
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:47:03AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:51:31PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> > On 05/31/2013 01:09 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:59:52AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> >>> On 05/31/2013 10:11 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >>>> Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >>>>>
2012 Nov 01
2
[LLVMdev] piping into lli broken on darwin
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:17:28PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli