similar to: [LLVMdev] polly source code missing from Downloads page

Bill, > Hi Pawel, > > Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.). Sure. But I do not know much about polly so 'polly' guys please fill me on the details. For the 3.2 release I will need: - to know how to build it seems to be covered here

Hi Pawel, Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.). -bw On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > Tobi, > It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night. Shouldn't there be > one now that polly

Tobi, It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night. Shouldn't there be one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release? Jack

On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <pawel at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > Bill, > >> Hi Pawel, >> >> Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.). > > Sure. > > But I do not know much about polly so 'polly' guys please

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> ... >>> Does attached patch work for you? >>> >>> Tobi >>> >> >> Tobi, >> Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make

On 10/21/2012 03:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:31:50PM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> ... >>>> Does attached patch work for you? >>>> >>>> Tobi >>>> >>> >>> Tobi,

Tobi, Any chance that you or one of the other developers could put the missing polly-3.2.tar.gz source tarball up on the llvm 3.2 downloads page? I am still finding that... http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/polly-3.2.src.tar.gz or http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/polly-3.2.tar.gz are still a dead links. Jack

On 10/21/2012 11:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:23:59AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Tobi, > What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing > polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated > in 3.3? > Jack Tobi, Is it even possible to build polly without cloog at the moment or is the presence of the -polly-codegen-isl

On 10/21/2012 12:47 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > ... >> Does attached patch work for you? >> >> Tobi >> > > Tobi, > Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test' > without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Thanks for

Tobi, What is the situation with -polly-codegen-isl in polly svn? Should we be testing polly without cloog as the default configuration or will cloog use not be deprecated in 3.3? Jack

On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>>> Duncan, >>>>> Is the documentation for using Polly

On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Duncan, >>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg >>> using the documentation at

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:17:28PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:35:49PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: ... > Does attached patch work for you? > > Tobi > Tobi, Yes, with this patch current llvm/polly svn builds and runs 'make polly-test' without issues in finding LLVMPolly.so. Thanks for fixing this so quickly. Do you have any comments on failing tests we are seeing on x86_64-apple-darwin11? Failing Tests (5):

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> Duncan, >>>> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:17:28PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:01:37AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/21/2012 10:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:38:48AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>> On 10/21/2012 09:13 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>>> On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 08:38:21AM -0700, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 10/20/2012 05:38 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Duncan, >> Is the documentation for using Polly support in dragonegg correct? I built llvm/polly/dragonegg >> using the documentation at http://polly.llvm.org/example_load_Polly_into_dragonegg.html >> with... >> >> GCC=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/bin/gcc-4