similar to: [LLVMdev] MemoryBuffer C Bindings - LLVMCreateMemoryBufferWithArray

Hi LLVM-ers, I am trying to get a return type of a function(from bitcode file) with LLVM-C API, but there seems no appropriate API to do that. I've tried to do that with following code, ---- LLVMModuleRef M; LLVMMemoryBufferRef MemBuf; LLVMValueRef F; // Function LLVMTypeRef RetTy; char *ErrStr; // // -- Load shader module //

On Mar 13, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Moritz Maxeiner <moritzmaxeiner at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If I write LLVM bindings for a language X, in which I obviously > need to at least use parts of the llvm-c headers (constants, enums, typedefs, function names and > signatures) do I need to include the LLVM copyright notice? > > Whereas llvm-c has multiple headers (e.g.

Does anybody have a good starting point for how to read the first word of a string and then, based on several defined pairs, swap it? I''ve been considering using something like @split = @message.split(''-'') if @split[0] == "word" ... elsif @split[0] == "otherword" ... end Even if this is the best way to do it, I''m not sure how to replace

Hi, i'm using LDAP authentication with dovecot, and it's working flawlessly,until i enable SSL.. (even imaps or pop3s) i can't log in... if i test the certificates, and the login with the `openssl s_client - host example.com -port 993 -verify -debug` command, it works, until i want to log in... it lists the capibilities, but when i login it says "01 NO LOGIN failed"...

While writing bindings to LLVM for another language via the c api I noticed that LLVMAlignment and LLVMStackAlignment do not use 1<<x like all the others, but 31<<x and 7<x respectively (see below, or here: http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Core_8h_source.html#l00148). It's likely this is as it is intended, but it does look out-of-place enough that I thought it might be a

I asked about this ability a few weeks ago and the reply was basically that folks would be interested in seeing it happen. Well, the client insisted, so I've put together a hack that accomplishes it. The basic design requirement was that users would not see files/directories that they did not have at least read access to. This request came about because we were migrating from a Novell server,

I''m happily running two four zone/four nic shorewall firewall configuratoins. Great software, works as expected everytime! We are conteplating a larger and more complex firewall configuration that may include as many as twelve zones with trying to cram as many as 8+ interfaces into a single machine. Are there any draw backs to this amount of zones and interfaces into a single

On Mar 13, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Moritz Maxeiner <moritzmaxeiner at googlemail.com> wrote: > On 03/13/2013 07:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> LLVM's license includes a binary redistribution clause: >> http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#license > > Hi Chris, > > the problem with the binary redistribution clause is that the bindings will not be linked with

On 03/13/2013 07:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > LLVM's license includes a binary redistribution clause: > http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#license Hi Chris, the problem with the binary redistribution clause is that the bindings will not be linked with any part of LLVM. The bindings will load an LLVM shared library (dll/so/dylib) at runtime and thus an application compiled

Hi, when building llvm as a shared library LLVMInitializeNativeTarget and co. (located in llvm/Support/TargetSelect) will not get exported as symbol into the shared library, because they are static inline. Since they are functions defined in the C API no one else inside LLVM calls them, which results in them not being exported. This is, of course, no problem for C programs using the C API,

Hi, If I write LLVM bindings for a language X, in which I obviously need to at least use parts of the llvm-c headers (constants, enums, typedefs, function names and signatures) do I need to include the LLVM copyright notice? Whereas llvm-c has multiple headers (e.g. Analysis.h, BitReader.h, Core.h, etc.) my bindings only have three files constants.d, types.d and functions.d which respectively

Hi, I stumbled across the following: > /* Builds a module from the bitcode in the specified memory buffer, > returning a > reference to the module via the OutModule parameter. Returns 0 on success. > */ > LLVMBool LLVMParseBitcode2(LLVMMemoryBufferRef MemBuf, > LLVMModuleRef *OutModule); However in most scenarios i know, a Bool is something like 0 = False !0 = True In short:

Attached is what I got thus far. What I'm struggling with is proper integration in build system. What is in there is just wild guesses from my side, both on autoconf and cmake variants. It would be great if someone with proper knowledge of the buildsystems could have a look. Also I'm not sure how to properly handle compilation on msvc - clearly "-std=c11 -Wstrict-prototypes" is

Of course, this is normal for C-APIs. But maybe change the name to LLVMResult to propagate the real use? I am not arguing about the results themself. They are standard. But the name is missguiding. As long as it's consistent i know that i have to write an extra record operator in Delphi to reflect this. 2016-09-12 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>: > On

Hi, What do you think is a reasonable salary for a ROR programmer in Manchester, UK? If you''re working with ROR and in the UK i''d be interested in knowing your salary :-) Your opinions would be very valuable to me JD -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Okay after translating the headers to Delphi, i found more inconsistencies: > LLVMTypeRef LLVMFunctionType(LLVMTypeRef ReturnType, > LLVMTypeRef *ParamTypes, unsigned ParamCount, > LLVMBool IsVarArg); > In this case it is the other way around. 0 means False and anything else means true :/ (so it acts more like a

Hello. First of all, thanx for that great codec. I would encode all my music with Ogg Vorbis in the future, if it hadn't been for some samples I encoded for test purposes: Everything was great as long a I used "natural" sounds/music, but certain pieces of synthesized music (specially techno) contained very audible artifacts even at high bitrates. So I just went on using mp3 for

On 2009-09-24, at 18:56, OvermindDL1 wrote: > Out of curiosity, what code in Clang is optimized by doing a pointer > derefence then compare to 0, rather then just comparing two points > directly? Does not seem that efficient when laid out like that, > which is why I am curious what code actually is helped by that > pattern? Consider parsing an integer: // With NUL

Hi, http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1MemoryBuffer.html shows "the file, and that this character will read as '\0'. " as a "verbatim text" box. This looks ugly and is probably a mistake. The attached patch removes this extra @verbatim ... @endverbatim from comments. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/llvm-2.7/tools/clang/lib/Basic' llvm[4]: Compiling Builtins.cpp for Release build llvm[4]: Compiling ConvertUTF.c for Release build llvm[4]: Compiling Diagnostic.cpp for Release build llvm[4]: Compiling FileManager.cpp for Release build llvm[4]: Compiling IdentifierTable.cpp for Release build llvm[4]: Compiling SourceLocation.cpp for Release build