similar to: [LLVMdev] annotations for optimization?

Thanks, Also, every method inherited by LoopBase causes the same error, while Loop methods go smooth. On 9 May 2013 01:05, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 8, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue <giacomo.tag at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > I am building a loop pass following these instructions: >

Wow, commenting those two lines worked out fine for me, thanks! On 9 May 2013 09:34, Giacomo Tagliabue <giacomo.tag at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, > Also, every method inherited by LoopBase causes the same error, while Loop > methods go smooth. > > > On 9 May 2013 01:05, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On May 8, 2013, at 7:43 PM,

Hello, I am building a loop pass following these instructions: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html Everything works fine, I did it many times for Function Passes, but in the runOnLoopmethod, whenever I call a method of the loop L passed as argument, for example L->begin(), I get the following error: opt: symbol lookup error: /home/giacomo/llvmcsfv/Debug+Asserts/lib/Acsl.so: >

On May 8, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue <giacomo.tag at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I am building a loop pass following these instructions: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html > Everything works fine, I did it many times for Function Passes, but in the runOnLoopmethod, whenever I call a method of the loop L passed as argument, for example L->begin(), I get the

Hello, I am building a loop pass following these instructions: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html Everything works fine, I did it many times for Function Passes, but in the runOnPass method, whenever I call a method of the loop L passed as argument, for example L->begin(), I get the following error: opt: symbol lookup error: /home/giacomo/llvmcsfv/Debug+Asserts/lib/Acsl.so: >

I created a loadable optimization following the tutorial at http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html. I want to use the Z3 library, installed in my system, in my optimization. When I include z3++.h (the name of the library) in the code and use its classes, it compiles well, but when I try to run it it says: > opt: symbol lookup error: /home/giacomo/llvm/Debug+Asserts/lib/Acsl.so: >

I think I am in the first case, but I don't understand something, the -load option during which command? opt? and which file should I load? libz3.so? On 5 April 2013 15:32, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 4/5/13 3:16 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote: > > I created a loadable optimization following the tutorial at >

On 4/5/13 3:16 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote: > I created a loadable optimization following the tutorial at > http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html. I want to use the Z3 > library, installed in my system, in my optimization. When I include > z3++.h (the name of the library) in the code and use its classes, it > compiles well, but when I try to run it it says: > >

Hello, I am building a loop pass following these instructions: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html Everything works fine, I did it many times for Function Passes, but in the runOnLoopmethod, whenever I call a method of the loop L passed as argument, for example L->begin(), I get the following error: opt: symbol lookup error: /home/giacomo/llvmcsfv/Debug+Asserts/lib/Acsl.so: >

Thanks, So, how do I check if a block dominates another one? On 25 April 2013 11:59, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/25/2013 11:52 AM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote: > >> Is there an easy way to know if, at a certain instruction, a certain >> value is usable or not? i.e., I am sure that if i use that value i don't >> to get the error

Is there an easy way to know if, at a certain instruction, a certain value is usable or not? i.e., I am sure that if i use that value i don't to get the error "Instruction does not dominate all uses!" Thanks, GT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130425/477fc259/attachment.html>

Hello, I want to compare a program before and after having run a FunctionPass. The purpose is merely didactic. What I would like to do is, during the runOnFunction() method, "save" somehow the instruction set and cfg of the function, run the optimization. and then compare the two codes, before and after the transformation. Is there an automatic way tho do that, or a suggested approach?

hello, i would like to read in a small amount of csv data directly from a sweave-enabled latex document. i tried \begin{Scode}{fig=FALSE,echo=TRUE} timeval <- read.csv(stdin(),nrows=2) t1,t2,t3,t4 24.23,26.79,23.47,23.97 \end{Scode} but apparently the stdin() approach doesnt't work as I get Writing to file test.tex Processing code chunks ... 1 : echo term verbatim Error: chunk 1

Hi, I have an Samba 2.0.7 Fileserver on my RedHat 7.0 Linuxbox Access to the shares with an Linuxclient - all works fine. When I use an Win98 or WIN ME client, I've got many network collisions. (Same file and share) Any ideas ? Thereis only one socket option set in my smb.conf: socket option = TCP_NODELAY Network = 100MBit/s Ethernet Changing of NICs,cables or Hub doesnt't resolve the

I'm attempting to install and run a program called ACSL (advanced continuous simulation language) on wine. So far the closest I've got is by installing Wine 20050725 on my Ubuntu (Debian) Linux by using the latest wine-config-sidenet-1.8.6 which appears to install ok and then installs the software ok. However when I try to run it using wine acslX which should start it I get lots of code

On 14/04/13 18:40, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote: > I want to compare a program before and after having run a FunctionPass. > The purpose is merely didactic. What I would like to do is, during the I do a dump of the Module (Module.print) before and after running it through a PassManager (you could also use the Function.print method I think). You can put just a single pass in the PassManager to

On 4/25/2013 11:52 AM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote: > Is there an easy way to know if, at a certain instruction, a certain > value is usable or not? i.e., I am sure that if i use that value i don't > to get the error "Instruction does not dominate all uses!" Check if the block containing the definition dominates the block where you want to use the value. If this is the same

On 4/25/2013 12:06 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote: > Thanks, > So, how do I check if a block dominates another one? In IR use analysis DominatorTree from "include/llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h". For machine instructions, use MachineDominatorTree from "include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineDominators.h". Both of them implement function "dominates" that takes two blocks

Thanks! I checked that module. If I use dominates(const Instruction *Def,const Instruction *User) it will automatically check everything, so I don't have to handle the case with instructions in the same BB, right? Thanks, GT On 25 April 2013 12:17, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/25/2013 12:06 PM, Giacomo Tagliabue wrote: > >> Thanks,

from samba 3.0.9 to 3.0.13 I can not access my shares from a NT4 box as usual before upgrading. I can access samba shares from linux via mount //server/testuser /mnt -o username=testuser,password=testpass as before. Even the newest version (3.0.14a) from samba.org doesnt't help. What has happened to samba ??? Any hints ?? Thanks for your thoughts, G?tz.