similar to: [LLVMdev] TBAA fail on optimization, why?

Hi Jun, did you tell "opt" to make use of TBAA? Also, please give complete IR that people can use to reproduce, and instructions on how to reproduce (eg how to run opt). Ciao, Duncan. > i have a simple code like below, in wich variable "aaa" does not alias > to "bbb". > i use TBAA to specify this, please see the code. > > then i ran this code thru

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Jun, did you tell "opt" to make use of TBAA? Also, please give complete > IR > that people can use to reproduce, and instructions on how to reproduce (eg > how > to run opt). > actually, i am still confused on which options should be given to "opt" for it to use TBAA. any

Hi Jun, On 27/09/12 08:02, Jun Koi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> Hi Jun, did you tell "opt" to make use of TBAA? Also, please give complete >> IR >> that people can use to reproduce, and instructions on how to reproduce (eg >> how >> to run opt). >> > > actually, i am still

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Jun, > > > On 27/09/12 08:02, Jun Koi wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jun, did you tell "opt" to make use of TBAA? Also, please give >>> complete >>> IR >>> that

Hi Jun, > ok, below is my code. i run this through "opt" with option: "-basicaa > -mem2reg -tbaa" > however, the resulted bitcode file is still the same; no optimization is done. that's because you didn't specify any optimization that uses alias analysis! LLVM makes a distinction between analyses and transforms. Analyses, like tbaa, are passes which look at

I am seeing an issue with getting certain sip devices to be recognized as defined SIP clients host= in the sip.conf and the only deference that I can find btw sources that work and don't work is that devices that send packets with an Initial Via header of themselves appears to work and pick the context correctly but those that don't have the Via just get dropped in the context of the

After a lot of processing I get a matrix into M. I expected each row and column to be a vector. But it is a list. R-Inferno says... "Arrays (including matrices) can be subscripted with a matrix of positive numbers. The subscripting matrix has as many columns as there are dimensions in the array—so two columns for a matrix. The result is a vector (not an array) containing the selected

Hello, I would like to plot the following xyplot : for each date of fff (1 date per panel), bbb=f(aaa) for the two groups (ddd=1 and ddd=2) superimposed. I can do it by group (see below) but not together. I looked at http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org/figures/figures.html but I haven't found what I was looking for (to be honest, I haven't understood all the examples). Any help will be

Hi, I would really like to have a way to split long string literals across multiple lines in R. Currently, if a string literal spans multiple lines, there is no way to inhibit the introduction of newline characters: > "aaa + bbb" [1] "aaa\nbbb" If a line ends with a backslash, it is just ignored: > "aaa\ + bbb" [1] "aaa\nbbb" We could use

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:12:09 -0500, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 14/06/2017 5:58 AM, Andreas Kersting wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would really like to have a way to split long string literals across > > multiple lines in R. > > I don't understand why you require the string to be a literal. Why not > construct the long

Hi there! I have been setuped exim and dovecot. Exim uses dovecot-lda to deliver mails to mailbox. Some configurations of exim: dovecot_virtual_delivery: ? driver = pipe ? command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d $local_part@$domain -f $sender_address ? message_prefix = ? message_suffix = ? delivery_date_add ? envelope_to_add ? return_path_add ? log_output ? user = vmail ? group = vmail ?

Dear R-help, Here's a simple example of nonlinear curve fitting where nls seems to get the answer wrong on a very simple exponential fit (my R version 2.7.2). Look at this code below for a very basic curve fit using nls to fit to (a) a logarithmic and (b) an exponential curve. I did the fits using self-start functions and I compared the results with a more simple fit using a straight lm()

Suppose, 'fr' is data.frame with columns 'Y', 'A' and 'B'. 'A' has levels 'Aa' 'Ab' and 'Ac', and 'B' has levels 'Ba', 'Bb', 'Bc' and 'Bd'. 'Y' columns are numbers. I tried the following three sets of commands. I understand that A*B is equivalent to A+B+A:B. However, A:B in A+B+A:B is

Full_Name: Daniel F Higgins Version: 2.4.0 OS: Windows XP and Mac OSX Submission from: (NULL) (128.111.242.49) Create a dataframe as indicated below and apply 'dput' to it; note that the row.names attribute is incorrect! > aaa <- c("AAA","BBB","AAA") > bbb <- c(1,2,3) > df <- data.frame(aaa,bbb) > dput(df) structure(list(aaa =

Dear R helpers, Suppose I have following data.frame. df <- data.frame(category = c("treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B",

I don't think it is reasonable to change the parser this way. This is currently valid R code: a <- "foo" "bar" and with the new syntax, it is also valid, but with a different meaning. Or you can even consider a <- "foo" bar %>% func() %>% print() etc. I like the idea of string literals, but the C/C++ way clearly does not work. The Python/Julia way

I have a to a samba server (4.4.16) on built on Solaris 11 samba pkg. It is a member of an Active directory domain. Users, for some time, have been experiencing long (20 -40 second) delays when browsing to, opening and writing a network share on the server. Attempts to do any of those results in a dialogue box being displayed showing: Contacting server: \\<server-name> \share

I have a samba server at ip address aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd I can connect to it from clients on subnets aaa.bbb.eee. and aaa.bbb.fff. I can't connect to it from clients on ggg.hhh. smb.conf has hosts deny = all hosts allow = localhost, aaa.bbb., ggg.hhh. The client can successfully 'ping mysambaserver' (resolves to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd). Doing 'net view \\mysambaserver' fails with

Dear R helpers, Thanks a lot for your earlier guidance esp. Mr Davind Winsemius Sir. However, there seems to be mis-communication from my end corresponding to my requirement. As I had mentioned in my earlier mail, I am dealing with a very large database of borrowers and I had given a part of it in my earlier mail as given below. For a given rating say "A", I needed to have the bad-wise

snat not working my local ip is aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa asterisk sitting on the internet at ip bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb my firewall''s internal ip is 192.168.0.254 i did snat: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j SNAT --to aaa.aaa.aaa iptables -t nat -L -v gives: Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 23663 packets, 2182K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 33056