Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Modifying address-sanitizer to prevent threads from sharing memory"
2012 Sep 26
1
[LLVMdev] Modifying address-sanitizer to prevent threads from sharing memory
Hi llvm-dev!
I'm writing my master's thesis on sandboxing/isolation of plugins
running in a multithreaded environment. These plugins run in a real-time
environment where the cost of IPC/context switching and being at the
scheduler's mercy is not an option. There can be a lot of plugin
instances running and all have to perform some computations and return
the result to the main thread
2015 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] Intercepting dlinfo in memory sanitizer
Thanks! I'll try that.
In order to avoid starting a new thread, let me ask you the next question.
One of the shared libraries I load calls strtol and msan fails to intercept
it. Why would this be? The library seems to be otherwise implemented. One
of the potential culprits I saw is that strtol is marked as strong in libc.
Is there any workaround?
Keno
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Evgeniy
2015 Apr 09
2
[LLVMdev] Intercepting dlinfo in memory sanitizer
Hi everyone,
I ran into a false positive with memory sanitizer due to it not
intercepting dlinfo. I tried to get started on writing such an interceptor,
but dlinfo seems like an extraordinarily difficult function to intercept.
The three considerations that I would like somebody to look at are:
1) How do we get the enum values to decide what kind of pointer dlinfo is
getting. Ideally we'd
2007 Feb 14
0
frame of silence
In what fashion does the encoder 'blowup' when passed a frame of zeroes
to encode?
What version of speex are you using?
________________________________
From: Chris Cowden [mailto:ccowden@ncsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2007 7:57 AM
To: David Hogan; speex-dev@xiph.org
Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] frame of silence
Okay, you've answered part of my question, which is
2005 Jun 03
1
IceCast 2.2 MP3 stream and Real Player noise
Look in the March 2004 archive for the thread: "Real Player and Icecast 2".
I don't get the blowup they describe, but we do get some type of transient
noise every few seconds. This occurs on all Windows PCs that we've tried
the current version of Real Player with our MP3 streams.
Fred
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Heyes [mailto:karl@xiph.org]
Sent: Friday, June 03,
2005 Jun 03
2
IceCast 2.2 MP3 stream and Real Player noise
Sure:
Make a pls file with this in it:
[playlist]
File1=http://mp31.batanga.com:8000/live
Title1=Test
Length1=-1
NumberOfEntries=1
Version=2
The version of Real Player: 10.5.
I don't hear the problem when listening with itunes or WMP.
Fred
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Heyes [mailto:karl@xiph.org]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:03 AM
To: Fred Black
Cc: icecast
Subject: RE:
2007 Feb 15
1
error during make
Hi All,
I am getting this error during make.
please help me./
speexec.c: In function `speex_ec_process':
speexec.c:112: syntax error before "noise"
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
speexec.c:133: warning: implicit declaration of function
`speex_echo_state_reset'
speexec.c:148: warning: passing arg 5 of `speex_echo_cancel' makes
pointer from integer without a cast
2007 Feb 14
2
frame of silence
Okay, you've answered part of my question, which is "What value equals
silence?". I assume then that a (decoded) frame of silence would be a
buffer the size of my frame (320 bytes) full of 0's.
Passing this frame (a frame of all 0's) through the encoder causes it to
blowup though..
In response to your answer below, I don't think I want to overwrite the
decoded
2018 Mar 15
1
[GSoC 2018] Integrate with Z3 SMT solver to reduce false positives.
Hi all,
I am a fourth year EE bachelors student who is very interested in
compilers. I have taken the only compilers course offered in my school and
did an independent study with my CS professor. Although I'll begin to work
in a couple of months, I definitely want to pursue my interest in compiler
design and optimization as a PhD in the future. I am very interested in the
z3 SMT solver
2006 Mar 25
1
[Fwd: st|r|eams from latinamerica sat25]
Live streams of InstallFest in Latin America
It's beens a hectic month and finally tomorrow sat25 we will be
celebrating the *2006 FLISOL* (Festival de Instalacion de Software Libre
in Latin America) a one day long installfest (/gratis installation of
free open source software/) that will blowup (MS windows rm) bits and
traces from the hard drives of a long list of people ready to get rid of
2006 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Loops
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Domagoj Babic wrote:
> Hi Chris,
Hi, for future reference, it's better to email the llvmdev list than it is
to email me directly (even if I'm the one that ends up responding), so
that others can see responses.
> If you remember, I mentioned on the channel that I'm planning to write a
> pass (or modify the existing code) to convert multiple-entry
2017 Mar 10
2
Modifying Address Sanitizer
Hello
I am willing to make changes in Address Sanitizer for experimentation. But
as I am a naive user I am confused with the fact that if I make changes to
Address Sanitizer do I have to rebuild the whole LLVM.
Could somebody please help me figure out a way in which I can make changes
to address sanitizer and do not have to compile the whole LLVM.
Aayushi Agrawal
-------------- next part
2017 Mar 10
2
Modifying Address Sanitizer
Thank you for the response.
Suppose I want to make changes in the LLVM part of Address Sanitizer.
Is there still a way to test the changes made to address sanitizer as a
standalone.
Also can a pass be run after Address Sanitizer Pass is ran, where I can
access the variables created by address sanitizer [LLVM Code] so that I
avoid making changes directly to the address sanitizer?
On Fri, Mar
2016 Apr 18
1
[RFC] Lazy-loading of debug info metadata
>
>> On 2016-Apr-15, at 17:12, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 2016-Apr-15, at 14:53, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Apr
2015 Nov 07
2
Docs for leak checker (and other sanitizers)?
I'm having trouble finding any documentation of the sanitizers,
especially the leak checker -- apparently because of the move from
code.google.com to github. Every doc has a link for "more information"
which goes to code.google.com which just redirects to github and
points to a placeholder doc that says lots of links are broken. I
haven't found the docs using any google-fu or
2015 Nov 10
2
Docs for leak checker (and other sanitizers)?
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> Most likely, you need
> https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerLeakSanitizer
Thanks!
> I don't think lsan supports this mode directly,
> but why do you think that the init-time allocations are going to be
> "leaked"?
> If there is some object still pointing to
2009 Jan 22
2
blowup portion of graph beside it
Hi,
I'd like to blow up portions of my graph and put it in boxes beside the
graph.Is there an addon to do this?
--
Rajesh.J
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 May 25
0
Asterisk to Alcatel 4400 via PRI: analog extensions work - digital do not
Hi,
I followed the how-to from
http://www.alcatelunleashed.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=840
All works fine except for Asterisk->Alcatel calls.
Actually, calls from Asterisk to analog extensions on
the Alcatel work.
However, calls from Aserisk to digital extensions on
the Alcatel 4400 do NOT work.
I get this error in the Asterisk log:
-- Executing Dial("SIP/4053-0823dd48",
2012 Jul 07
0
Bug#675052: Problem with dynamic memory
Good day.
Continue to research that issue.
Current state:
PV guest, static_min=500MiB, static_max=1GiB, dynamic=800MiB, domid=2
manually create /local/domain/2/control/feature_balloon.
Do xe vm-memory-target-set uuid=... target=650MiB
squeezed debug:
20120707T03:00:57Z Request for
squeezed/balance-memory/3c46cc6a-c1df-deab-1aed-0b0ad939961b
20120707T03:00:57Z listdir
2010 Nov 29
0
resending cause codes
hello,
i'm testing sending ISDN cause codes to customer pbx (test scenario for
unallocated number)
topology:
PSTN-E1-AsteriskA-AsteriskB-SOMEPBX
INVITE from SOMEPBX to PSTN
AsteriskA sends to AsteriskB
Status-Line: SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable
X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Unallocated (unassigned) number
X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 1
how can i resend HangupCauseCode from AsteriskB to