similar to: [LLVMdev] Offer of membership to LLVM into the Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc.

On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:14 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: >> I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the >> developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, >> or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, >> discussed below.

On Sep 18, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> wrote: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not interested in that topic, please feel

For a number of years now, the Samba Team has been a member of the Software Freedom Conservancy. They handle quite a bit of administration for our project as well as pursuing GPL compliance. If you'd like to see more about what they do, please check: https://sfconservancy.org/about/ We urge you to support the Conservancy. Here is a message from our own Jeremy Allison:

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > Yes, we would like to make it easier for companies and individuals to > donate money, but also we need a way to be able to spend it. The > University of Illinois is our current solution - they are capable of > accepting money and keep it in an ear-marked account, but our requests > to actually spend it (e.g. for student travel)

On 9/19/12 7:47 PM, John Criswell wrote: > [snip] > >> >> This, then, creates the issue that we have LLVM sub-projects that do >> not have the same license as the main project, which in turn means we >> can't free move code between the various sub-projects and the main >> project. I know that the Address Sanitizer guys have had issues with >> this

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:04:02 -0700 Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:56 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > > > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > >> We are not interested in copyright enforcement at all. In personal > >> discussions with Bradley, he mentioned that they may be able to > >> help us

On 9/19/12 6:04 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:56 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > >> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >>> We are not interested in copyright enforcement at all. In personal >>> discussions with Bradley, he mentioned that they may be able to help >>> us move the codebase to the MIT license, which would clarify

On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:56 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >> We are not interested in copyright enforcement at all. In personal >> discussions with Bradley, he mentioned that they may be able to help >> us move the codebase to the MIT license, which would clarify that >> issue as well as resolve the current issues around

Apologies if this is a little off-topic, but the Software Freedom Conservancy (which is the legal umberella organization for the Samba Project and may other Free Software projects such as Wine) just announced their "Supporters" program: http://sfconservancy.org/supporter/ Please check it out, and if you're feeling generous - join :-). Disclaimer: I'm on the Board of Directors

Hi all, You may not know, but The Software Freedom Conservancy is the legal home of the Samba project. However, most Linux-using corporations *really* hate GPL enforcement. To the point where they'll pull funding for diversity programs and try and get conference talks cancelled. I hope Samba users will help support Conservancy so it can continue doing vital work for us and other projects.

Xapian is in the process of joining the Software Freedom Conservancy (https://sfconservancy.org/), but one thing we need to sort out before we can finalise this is some sort of more formal project leadership structure. James Aylett and I have discussed this with Bradley Kuhn from Conservancy, and we think the most appropriate model currently would be a small group of at least 3 (to avoid deadlock

Hi, I would send an introductory e-mail to: R-foundation at R-project.org <mailto:R-foundation at R-project.org> That will facilitate further discussion on the matter and additional details can be requested offline as may be needed. Be aware that none of the R Foundation members are lawyers. So while we can perhaps offer informal and non-binding opinions, you should seek formal legal

We are equally excited about working with you over summer. I think you missed reply by Olly on IRC, you can find it in logs here: https://botbot.me/freenode/xapian/2018-04-24/?msg=99336093&page=1 - olly icebyte[m]: i think that probably needs to go through SFC ( https://sfconservancy.org/) as the "legal entity" - 2:05 am

Hello, This is likely fairly silly question, and I apologize to whomever takes the time to respond. I am a relatively new user of R, on Windows XP, version 2.3.1. Say I have a data table that looks like the following: x Date Location Amount Blue Green 1 01/01/2001 Central 1817 TRUE FALSE 2 01/02/2001 Central 20358 FALSE TRUE 3 05/08/2001 Central 16245 FALSE TRUE 4

On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-21 00:30, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote: >> But for my business, I do not want to pay Red Hat, Zimbra, or Google >> Workspace. >> Why ? >> Because the general rule seems to be >> Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service >> What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely

Hi Everyone, Many tech communities, including GitHub <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list

Hi, I'm trying to access a remote fiscal printer under Wine. I'm wondering if it's possible to use the 'net use' command from Windows (but under wine) to map the remote printer or if it's possible to simple mount the remote printer (dunno how as mount.cifs gives no clue about how to mount print shares) under 'dosdevices/unc' anyone ? Thanks in advance. Ricardo

On Tue, January 5, 2016 3:50 pm, Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 4, 2016, at 8:37 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, January 4, 2016 6:18 pm, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 1/4/2016 4:03 PM, tdukes at palmettoshopper.com wrote: >>>> >>>> I have an old IBM Netvista. >>> >>> 10 to 15 years old?

Hello R community, I am computing weighted average statistic by using ddply function: My data set is: N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY-4 ROE11 EPS11 MKT11 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY-3 ROE12 EPS12 MKT12 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY-2 ROE13 EPS13 MKT13 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY-1 ROE14 EPS14 MKT14 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY0 ROE15 EPS15 MKT15 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY1 ROE16 EPS16 MKT16 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY2 ROE17

Hi everyone: I need to count the number of banks of each firm in my data. The firm is identified by the fiscal number. The banks of each firm appears like this: Firm Banks 500600700 Citybank 500600700 CGD 500600700 BES 500600800 Citybank 500600800 Bank1 500600900 CGD I want to obtain the following dataframe: Firm