similar to: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Looking for LLVM 3.2 Release Manager

Thought I hit reply all, but I guess I was wrong. -- John T. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [RFC] Looking for LLVM 3.2 Release Manager Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:23:52 -0500 From: John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> Organization: University of Illinois To: Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> On 9/13/12 3:15 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >

It is very exciting to see experimental Windows support listed for 3.3. Is there documentation somewhere that tracks what works and what doesn't in this configuration, particularly for C++?. Otherwise it is difficult for those not actively involved in developing Windows support to know what to expect when experimenting. Thanks, Andrew On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Bill Wendling

I'm not sure I follow. Will the final binaries have a bad RPATH or not? A 1sec startup pause on some (admittedly crazy) systems seems like a big deal to me. On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > > It's probably PR12517. > > > >

On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > It's probably PR12517. > > Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH: > > $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH > RPATH >

On May 24, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi! > > The binaries for the 3.3 release candidate 2 are starting to role in. Please take them and give them a go. Please file bug reports for any problems you encounter. > > At this point, we are taking fixes only for *serious* regressions from 3.2. I will be pushing back on all requests to merge

Hi Bill, I was running some benchmarks and was surprised that the startup performance of your binaries is much worse than the stable binaries for 3.2 I've used: http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/clang+llvm-3.2-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-12.04.tar.gz vs http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3/clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64.tar.gz On a simple hello.c file: /ssd/bench$ TIMEFORMAT="%E"

If the time is convenient, I'd love to attend (I'm a newbie with LLVM, but am starting to integrate it into my personal project). I do have a question, as my google searches are fruitless: when and where was it last year? -Jon On Jan 6, 2008, at 5:26 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all, > > It's the new year! So the question on everybody's mind is, of course, >

On Nov 16, 2012, at 2:17 PM, 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Recent code owner activities have led to > what I would call loss of referential integrity > in the CODE_OWNERS.TXT file. > > Changes are fine but the information in the > CODE_OWNERS.TXT does not allow to positively > identify code owner of the particular > file or patch.

It's probably PR12517. Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH: $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH RPATH $ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin This will slow things down if the system tries to automount /home/aadgrand. Maybe we should merge r182559

The ARM binaries seem to be corrupt. Although correctly signed, the xz file seems to be truncated arm7% unxz < clang+llvm-3.5.0-rc3-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz | wc -c unxz: (stdin): Unexpected end of input 133214381 M.E.O. On Aug 21, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Ahem. And now for the correct URL: > >

Hello, Is there a chance to get Darwin 32 bit binaries? On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Somorjai, Akos <ASomorjai at graphisoft.com> wrote: > Thanks, downloading at the moment. > > Best, > > Ákos > > > On 11/27/11 3:35 AM, "Bill Wendling" <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >>Rather, use this URL for the darwin binaries: >> >>  

Thanks, downloading at the moment. Best, Ákos On 11/27/11 3:35 AM, "Bill Wendling" <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >Rather, use this URL for the darwin binaries: > > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/ > >-bw > >On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote: > >> May I have the darwin binaries as well? >> >> Best, Akos >>

Depending on when and where, I'd love to attend. Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Bill Wendling > Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 3:26 AM > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List > Subject:

Hey, Do you want projects which specifically use LLVM 3.1 or just LLVM in general? Regards, Alex On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all! > > Please remember to update the release notes! We're getting close to the release date, and we need the notes to be up-to-date. > > Also, if you have a project which uses LLVM, please

Rather, use this URL for the darwin binaries: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/ -bw On Nov 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote: > May I have the darwin binaries as well? > > Best, Akos > > > > On 11/25/11 10:31 AM, "Ákos Somorjai" <asomorjai at graphisoft.com> wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> Ákos >> >> >>

On Nov 8, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Jay Foad wrote: > On 7 November 2011 22:00, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >> We are starting on our third (and hopefully last) round of testing for LLVM 3.0. Please visit: >> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/rc3/ >> >> for the sources. There are also binaries for Darwin up there, with more to come during

Another one: Name: SDC - The Stupid D Compiler (https://github.com/bhelyer/SDC) Description: A project seeking to write a self-hosting compiler for the D programming language, without using the frontend of the reference compiler (DMD). Regards, Alex On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Good day! > > To get ready for the release, we need

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Good day! > > To get ready for the release, we need to make sure that the list of external open source projects using LLVM 3.0 (file:///Volumes/Sandbox/llvm/llvm.src/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#externalproj) is up to date. Please send me an email with the project's name and a short description of it.

I'll make them available tonight. Sorry for the delay. -bw On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote: > Binaries (at least darwin), anyone? > > Thanks, > > Ákos > > > On 11/1/11 6:38 AM, "Bill Wendling" <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> We are now in Phase 2 of testing for the LLVM 3.0 release! Please

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:07:25PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi David, > > Yes. It was the main reason why I decided to do an RC3. :-) > > -bw Bill, Any chance we can squeeze http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9571#c13 into llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9 for the final llvm-gcc release? Jack > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:41 AM, David Terei wrote: > > > Hi