similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm-mc fixups

Showing the value for the fixup requires full object code layout and relaxation, which isn't done is the text-to-text path. --Owen On Sep 12, 2012, at 5:54 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > When I use llvm-mc’s ‘-show-encoding’, it only goes as far as printing “fixups”: > > > $ echo -e "adr r0, lbl\nnop\nlbl:" | llvm-mc -triple=thumbv7

> Showing the value for the fixup requires full object > code layout and relaxation, which isn't done is the text-to-text path. Their are 2 problems I'm looking to solve: 1) How do we unit-test the integrated assembler when there are fixups? 2) Can we avoid the duplication in encoding a fixup versus encoding an immediate? In the case of ADR, the fixup was properly being

Hello All, I have the following dataset: Year 2006 2007 Jan Jan 0.0204 0.0065 Feb Feb 0.0145 0.0082 Mar Mar 0.0027 0.0122 > dput(d_tmp) structure(list(Year = c("Jan", "Feb", "Mar"), `2006` = c(0.0204, 0.0145, 0.0027), `2007` = c(0.0065, 0.0082, 0.0122)), .Names = c("Year", "2006", "2007"), row.names = c("Jan",

Dear R-help mailing list, I have a drawing problem with R: I need to draw an horizontal axis with date, here is the test code: > ticks <- c("2004-01-22","2005-01-22","2006-01-22","2007-01- 22","2008-01-22","2009-01-22","2010-01-22","2011-01-22","2012-01-22") > ats <-

Hi all, I have this problem with lattice that xyplot() won't draw some of my axis labels if the type (i.e. the relation argument) of scales is set as free. For example, in the plot below, I would want it to also show: 1. the labels E1,...E6 below the 10th panel (i.e. 3rd row, 2 col)....just as it is now done below the 12th panel.... 2. as well as the labels (2,4,6,8) on the top of panels 1

Is there a way to achieve lbl=c("a", "b", "c", "d") par(mfrow=c(2,2), ann=FALSE) for (t in 1:4){ plot(seq(from=1,to=2*pi,length=100), sin(t*seq(from=1,to=2*pi,length=100)), type="l") title(main=paste("(", lbl[t], ")", sep="")) } without having to use an object like 'lbl'? More generally: is it possible

This flag cannot be disabled (yet) in V5 xfs filesystems; since 2 out of the current 3 tests of xfs_admin check other results than that flag, avoid setting it when not needed. --- generator/actions.ml | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/generator/actions.ml b/generator/actions.ml index 9ea5736..14902e7 100644 --- a/generator/actions.ml +++

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505 ------- Additional Comments From mindrot at ee.lbl.gov 2003-03-08 15:19 ------- Created an attachment (id=241) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=241&action=view) patch to ssh.c This patch makes ssh use SSLeay_version(SSLEAY_VERSION) to generate a human readable version string. ------- You are receiving this mail

The following code should give me (at least that's what I think) two list boxes with their individual scrollbars. But instead both scrollbars stick to the same listbox even though they work as they should (scroll individual listboxes). When I remove all the widgets on top everything works perfectly. Any help would be highly apprecciated. ps: all subsequent listboxes and scrollbars work

Hi Paul, Regarding the "No Touchie!" constraint idea for asm statements: would this be a new qualifier (like volatile) that could be applied to the asm statement? Since the constraint is not necessarily associated with an input or output operand, it seems that introducing the constraint via the qualifier field might work. All, The volatile qualifier on an asm statement already

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610 Summary: sshd should display the openssl version string from usage() Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs

The team I am working with is using asm statements containing label definitions as a way of instrumentation so that when an application is loaded into their debug and test framework, the labels will cause breakpoints to be set at strategic points where they can query the state of the processor that the application is running on. ~ Todd From: Eli Friedman [mailto:efriedma at quicinc.com] Sent:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=847 Summary: Including arpa/nameser.h in inet_ntop.c can cause compile problems Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Build system AssignedTo:

After a recent upstream pull, my builds for ARM thumbv7 suddenly fail with messages like: error: instruction requires: arm-mode 21 uxtah r6, r0, r6 I use llc with -mtriple=thumbv7-unknown-unknown and llvm-mc with -triple=thumbv7-unknown-unkown. What's the right way to generate thumbv7 binaries? Thanks, -steve

Good afternoon, I am working on a plot that requires custom legends to be placed in some panels of the plot; other panels do not contain legends. The problem that I run into is positioning of the legend in individual panels. In particular, the 'x' and 'y' elements of the key-list are ignored by draw.key() when it is called from inside a panel function. As a result, the legend is

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 Summary: rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression? Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: mej@lbl.gov

Suppose a programmer wants to inject their own global label definition into the body of a function with some guarantee that it will not be removed by the compiler. One way to do this is to define a global label with an asm statement knowing that the asm statement will not be invoked until after the compiler's optimization passes have run, but the following case demonstrates that a label

Subject: Eliminate repeated components from a vector X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: fjmolina at lbl.gov FCC: /home/f/.xemacs/mail/sent Does anyone know how I can eliminate repeated elements from a vector?

Hi James, Thanks for the answer, can you elaborate on difference between thumb, thumb2, ARM, thumbv7. I'm a bit lost right now. When specifying thumbv7 llc will generate thumb only code, not thumb2 ? Best Regards Seb > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of James Molloy > Sent: Tuesday, May 29,

Subject: activity of CPU used by R X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: fjmolina at lbl.gov FCC: ~/mail/sent My R processes never use more than 50% of my CPU activity. Is there any way I can make them use more of it? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read