similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM inaugural Bristol area social, 20 September

Some of my LLVM colleagues that I only seem to encounter at the annual Bay Area dev meeting live right here in Austin, TX. We should get together for a social, yeah? And I suppose there's bound to be more around here who might be interested who haven't been able to trek to San Jose. So consider this an official solicitation to Austin area LLVM fans. Write back with interest and I'l

Greetings to all of the Shorewall community! We''d like to find out a little more about the environments in which Shorewall runs, and to this end i''ve created a survey. It is mostly designed to allow Shorewall users to see how their environment compares with that of the average Shorewall user (if such a thing exists!), but the results may be used by the Shorewall team to assist

Count me in. Some of my colleagues will join as well. Sebastian On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:44 AM Francesco Petrogalli via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Nice idea Brian, I am based in Austin and I would like to socialize with other LLVM engineers in the area. > > Constrains: I might not be in town for the week of Apr 29 - May 3rd :) > > Francesco > >

Hello Asterisk users, I'm having a little problem with an Asterisk installation on Ubuntu, i had installed many asterisks on CentOS but never in Ubuntu, the problem is that Asterisk and DAHDI does not start at system start...i have to make "/etc/init.d/asterisk start" and "/etc/init.d/dahdi start" manually every time i reboot the machine (my laptop for testing) So, what

Hi Renato, Currently I am building a set of patches which will add AAP piece-wise. I'm following the approach that AVR (and now RISC-V), and the patches I plan on adding are as follows: * Target triple * ELF definition * Basic skeleton with the required build system changes (targetinfo + target machine) * Instruction + Register tablegen * MC layer support * AsmParser * InstPrinter *

Yes, please do. Simon On Wed 17 Oct 2012 02:20:17 BST, Sean Silva wrote: > Wow this is awesome! Would it be okay if we linked to this from llvm.org/docs? > > -- Sean Silva > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Simon Cook <simon.cook at embecosm.com> wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I have been implementing the integrated assembler for the OpenRISC 1000 >>

Wow this is awesome! Would it be okay if we linked to this from llvm.org/docs? -- Sean Silva On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Simon Cook <simon.cook at embecosm.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I have been implementing the integrated assembler for the OpenRISC 1000 > architecture. > > Whilst doing this I noticed a lack of documentation around this area. To > help others,

As it stands, the active customers for this target are the out-of-tree backends which we are working on which can't be submitted for inclusion into LLVM. The general aim of the backend though is to include features from architectures which are not well represented in LLVM, for example non-power of two register sizes, non-octet chars, or very constrained register sets, and to this end we hope

Hi all, I have just updated most of the patches to roll them forwards to LLVM top-of-tree, and incorporated various suggested changes. We're still looking for reviewers, if anyone is interested. Thank you, Edward Jones On 15/09/16 17:12, Ed Jones wrote: > I have now posted the final two patches for the backend to add > Disassembler support, ISel and CodeGen. The full list of patches

Hi all, We wish to submit our latest AAP implementation as an experimental backend into LLVM. We need community feedback and reviewers for patches which we will submit soon. AAP was designed in early 2015 and aims to advance compiler development for small deeply embedded Harvard architectures, which are widely used commercially. AAP is freely available as an open source softcore for use in FPGA

Hi all, I am trying to compile with a minimal TestAsmParser class, but I get the following error. ---------------- [43/780] Linking CXX executable bin/llvm-mc FAILED: : && /usr/bin/c++ -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-comment -std=c++11

Hi Everyone, I have been implementing the integrated assembler for the OpenRISC 1000 architecture. Whilst doing this I noticed a lack of documentation around this area. To help others, I have written a how to guide which uses the OpenRISC 1000 as an example. This can be downloaded from http://www.embecosm.com/download/ean10.html. I hope this document proves useful. Any feedback would be

The initial proposal to include AAP in LLVM met with some concern that it would be actively maintained (thread from http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/103807.html ), and after some review activity seemingly went quiet (although review code has been updated quite recently). Is AAP likely to land any time soon? Also an AAP architecture question (possibly the wrong forum, though

Hello Asterisk users, We are having MANY but MANY problems configuring an analog fax machine to work properly on Asterisk, the first thing we do was to plug in the Fax analog machine to the FXS port of the Digium TDM410P, we set echocancel=no on zapata.conf and also faxdetect=yes on general section, but our Asterisk CRASH every time we try to send/receive fax! We are using Asterisk 1.4.21 and

Hi, I'm looking into development of an llvm-objdump utility for hexagon and I've read that there is a way to have tablegen automatically generate decode tables for you. I've not been able to find much info on this topic, the best info I've been able to find is this tutorial: http://www.embecosm.com/appnotes/ean10/ean10-howto-llvmas-1.0.html#idp3570032 I've managed to get

TL;DR: I am proposing to add the GCC C Torture suite [1], as an additional external source of tests for the “nightly” test suite. If you are willing to review the patch, it is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66887 Background: While working on the RISC-V backend, we have found it useful to use additional test suites beyond the in-tree Clang and LLVM tests and the LLVM nightly tests, in order to

On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 19:54 +0200, Pavel Šnobl wrote: > Hi Jesper, > > thank you for working on this. My company (Codasip) would definitely > be interested in having this feature upstream. I think that this is > actually important for a suprisingly large number of people who > currently have to maintain their changes downstream. I have a couple > of questions and comments:

hi, --> i have 8cores cpu. but my xenserver is using only one cpu, how to make use of all cpu cores --> machine is having 16G ram but domain0 is having very less memory. is there any way to increase memory for domain0 [root@xenserver-DZONGRI ~]# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 574464 kB MemFree: 111776 kB Buffers: 9500 kB Cached: 117320 kB SwapCached: 100

Hi Everyone, I'd like to announce a project joint between the University of Bristol and Embecosm. In this project we hope to identify what effect a broad range of compiler options has on the energy consumption of different embedded platforms. To do this we are finding a set of relevant benchmarks, compiling them with different options and measuring their energy consumption on these platforms.

Op di 3 sep. 2019 om 18:36 schreef Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > On 9/3/19 7:19 AM, Sam Elliott wrote: > > There are 1500 tests total, and about 100 on the platform-agnostic > blacklist. Alex and I do not think this is an onerous burden for > maintenance, either as an external test suite or if the test suite is > imported. > > > >