similar to: [LLVMdev] Clang/llvm performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

Hello all. I''ve recently installed the 0.2.2 pre-release of mongrel_cluster to try out the new --clean option. However, after installing, when I give a simple "mongrel_rails" command, the cluster::status command is not listed. The error I receive when I do try and run the full "mongrel_rails cluster::status" is... ERROR RUNNING

PATCH 2/4] like for cpustat, introduce the "guest" and "cguest" fields for = the tasks. Modify signal_struct and task_struct. Modify /proc/<pid>/stat to display these new= field Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> -- = ------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net -------------- "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth --------------

PATCH 2/4] like for cpustat, introduce the "guest" and "cguest" fields for = the tasks. Modify signal_struct and task_struct. Modify /proc/<pid>/stat to display these new= field Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> -- = ------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net -------------- "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth --------------

[PATCH 2/4] like for cpustat, introduce the "gtime" (guest time of the task= ) and "cgtime" (guest time of the task children) fields for the tasks. Modify signal_struct and task_struct. Modify /proc/<pid>/stat to dis= play these new fields. Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> -- = ------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net --------------

[PATCH 2/4] like for cpustat, introduce the "gtime" (guest time of the task= ) and "cgtime" (guest time of the task children) fields for the tasks. Modify signal_struct and task_struct. Modify /proc/<pid>/stat to dis= play these new fields. Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> -- = ------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net --------------

I am getting an odd situation when backing up a number of ext3 filesystems and was wondering if it could be caused by journalling. Over the space of a minute the load average will jump from 2 to over 40 and the system will be unresponsive for anywhere from 8 to 25 minutes. I am going to be trying a number of things, but was wondering if anyone could see the reason for the high load given the

At Thu, 3 Jul 2014 15:58:41 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 04:31:46PM +0300, Gleb Voronich wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I'm trying to get memory usage statistic inside a guest machine using > >virDomainMemoryStats function at libvirt. > >According to > >http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainMemoryStatTags the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3189 Bug ID: 3189 Summary: channel mux_ctx memory leak Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

I seem to be having a problem, but I'm not sure if it's -stable, Squid, or neither. I've been running -stable+Squid on a Dell 4600 for a couple years now. All has been well, but after upgrading to Squid 2.5_3 (which was also done on a couple other, less-loaded, -stable machines without this issue to date), I occasionally get errors in my cache.log and this AM Squid died and required

Here is a programming question. The code I am using is quite slow and I was wondering if there is a way to get rid of the for loop. I am dealing with "interaction" in 2x2 table, and am using Edwards's G_I (Likelihood, p. 194). I label the cells in the table as follows stim response "y" "n" total -------------------------------- y hit miss nsignal

[[this bounced first, because it has 'help' in the Subject line ... -- Martin Maechler ]] I am a complete novice R programmer. (Though I know C quite well) I am trying to write some R code to do the following simulation. There is a 2-frame "movie" of noise and signal dots. the noise dots have random positions in each frame. The signal dots are placed randomly in frame 1,

I noticed this in current intermediate patch version: > runif(0,0,4095) numeric(0) > round(runif(0,0,4095)) [1] NA I don't like it, but maybe it is the way it is supposed to be. I would prefer for it to stay numeric(0). I notice also > ceiling(runif(0,0,4095)) numeric(0) > floor(runif(0,0,4095)) numeric(0) which leads me to thing round() is not working right. I have some code

Hello, I'm trying to get memory usage statistic inside a guest machine using virDomainMemoryStats function at libvirt. According to http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainMemoryStatTags the structure could have a lot of useful memory statistic but the amount of parameters depends on the hypervisor and the driver. However using KVM I'm able to get

On Sun, Nov 07 2010 at 6:05pm -0500, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote: > > On 11/07/2010 08:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > >> I read about barrier-problems and data getting to the partition when > > >> using dm-crypt and several layers so I don''t know if that could be > >