similar to: [LLVMdev] [lld] Patch to incorporate lld test-suite into "make check-all"

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Andy Gibbs <andyg1001 at hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > Hi again, > > Any interest in this patch to incorporate lld testing into "make check-all" > when lld built as part of llvm? Is this the best place to post patches for > lld? > > I've attached it again here to include a missing dependency. > > Cheers > Andy > >

Hi, Attached is a patch which incorporates the lld test-suite into llvm's "make check-all" if lld is built within llvm. Please could someone review this for me. I've hand-amended the patch so that it should be easier to review. The majority of the patch is simply changing the indent once inside and else()/endif() block. Beyond that, I've standardised the test target name

On Thursday, July 26, 2012 1:45 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote: > Attached is a patch which incorporates the lld test-suite > into llvm's "make check-all" if lld is built within llvm. > Please could someone review this for me. Sorry, I missed a dependency. Here is an additional patch for the additional dependency: Index: tools/lld/test/CMakeLists.txt

> *NOTE* IIRC compiling this with -O0 on x86-64 can yield the wrong result > since clang will emit shifts and on intel shifts are mod the register > size [...snip...] I remember finding the same thing (although I haven't tried it on a recent clang version) and what I wondered was whether there was mileage in having an explicit intrinsic for rotation (like there is for bit counting,

Hi, Please could someone kindly review this patch for me? Many thanks Andy On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:15 AM, Andy Gibbs wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure where to post this since it relates to the "debuginfo-tests" > repository, so please tell me where to forward it if this is the wrong > place! > > I've fixed the forward-declare-class.cpp test-case in

Hi, I'm afraid it looks like commit r160899 has broken two test-cases which are part of the "debuginfo-tests" repository. I believe I have narrowed it down to the correct commit... Cheers Andy

On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 7:19 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote: > I'm afraid it looks like commit r160899 has broken two test-cases > which are part of the "debuginfo-tests" repository. I believe I > have narrowed it down to the correct commit... Erm, but I didn't post the details (obviously too much in a rush to get home last night! My apologies!) So here it is: The tests that

Dear all, I'm fairly new to Samba and CIFS and, for that matter, Linux in general. I'm having a problem with "mount.cifs" as provided with Debian 5. I'm afraid I cannot say what version of mount.cifs I have since doing "mount.cifs -V" does not (contrary to the message it shows when I do this) actually show the version, but rather how to use the program. The

On Monday, July 30, 2012 12:16 AM, Cameron McInally wrote: > Hey Andy, > > I proposed a similar patch to LLVM (left circular shift) around 10/2011. > Parts of my patch did make it into trunk about a year after, but others > did not. > > At that time, my solution was to add a binary operator to the IRBuilder, > since LCS fits in nicely with the other shift operators. But,

Hello, thank you very much for your previous answers about the C++ code. I am interested in the application of the Gibbs Sampler in the IRT models, so in the function MCMCirt1d and MCMCirtkd. I've found the C++ source codes, as you suggested, but I cannot find anything about the Gibbs Sampler. All the files are for the Metropolis algorithm. Maybe I am not able to read them very well, by the

I suspect it''s probably not a good idea but I was wondering if someone could clarify the details. I have 4 250G SATA(150) disks and 1 250G PATA(133) disk. Would it cause problems if I created a raidz1 pool across all 5 drives? I know the PATA drive is slower so would it slow the access across the whole pool or just when accessing that disk? Thanks for your input. - Chris

I have been using the rtmvt function in the {tmvtnorm} package i'm getting the warning: "Acceptance rate is very low and rejection sampling becomes inefficient. Consider using Gibbs sampling." but i AM specifying the gibbs algorithm!!: rtmvt(M, mean=q[,,i,j], sigma=((u[i,j] + nu[i])/(p+nu[i]))*delta[,,i], df=ceiling(nu[i]+p), lower=c(0,0), algorithm="gibbs") Any

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: n?o dispon?vel URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110405/06486a8a/attachment.pl>

Hello R community, following is my code and it shows error, can some one fix this error and explain why this occurs? gibbs <-function(m,n, theta = 0, lambda = 1){ alpha <- 1.5 beta <- 1.5 gamma <- 1.5 x<- array(0,c(m+1, 3)) x[1,1] <- theta x[1,2] <- lambda x[1,3]<- n for(t in 2:m+1){ x[t,1] <- rbinom(x[t-1,3], 1, x[t-1,1])

I have downloaded the Umacs (Universal Markov chain sampler) and submitted the following sample code from Kerman and Gelman.   s <-Sampler( J=8, sigma.y  =c(15,10,16,11,9,11,10,18),           y  =c(28, 8,-3,7,-1,1,18,12),      theta =Gibbs(theta.update,theta.init),           V =Gibbs(V.update,mu.init),         mu =Gibbs(mu.update,mu.init),         tau =Gibbs(tau.update,tau.init),       

Hi, I want to use R_qsort_int_I() in my C function, but getting the following error. It looks like there is a conflict between Rmath.h, which I use to generate random numbers, and R_ext/Boolean.h I would appreciate any help to fix this problem. gcc -ansi -g -o Gibbs gibbs.c subroutines.o rand.o vector.o -lm -lRmath -llapack -lblas -lfrtbegin -lg2c -lm -shared-libgcc In file included from

Hello! I was wondering if it's possible to see the actual code of checkTmvArgs function that is part of the code for rtmvnorm (which is below - I just typed "rtmvnorm" on the prompt). I get an error: Error in checkTmvArgs(mean, sigma, lower, upper) : sigma must be a symmetric matrix At the same time I am pretty sure that the matrix I am passing as sigma is a var-covar matrix

I try to fit a LDA model to a TermDocumentMatrix with the topicmodels package... but R says: > Error in LDA(TDM, k = k, method = "Gibbs", control = list(seed = SEED, : > x is of class ?TermDocumentMatrix??simple_triplet_matrix? > class(TDM) > [1] "TermDocumentMatrix" "simple_triplet_matrix" I try to use a matrix... but don't work: > MAT

Hi, I have to draw samples from an asymmetric-Laplace-Normal distribution: f(u|y, x, beta, phi, sigma, tau) \propto exp( - sum( ( abs(lo) + (2*tau-1)*lo )/(2*sigma) ) - 0.5/phi*u^2), where lo = (y - x*beta) and y=(y_1, ..., y_n), x=(x_1, ..., x_n) -- sorry for this huge formula -- A WinBUGS Gibbs sampler and the HI package arms sampler were used with the same initial data for all parameters. I

Hello, I have a statistical problem that I am using R for, but I am not making sense of the results. I am trying to use multiple regression to explore which variables (weather conditions) have the greater effect on a local atmospheric variable. The data is taken from a database that has 20391 data points (Z1). A simplified version of the data I'm looking at is given below, but I have a