similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore"

2012 Jun 28
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore
On Jun 27, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This patch, though large, simply moves lib/Analysis/DebugInfo.cpp to lib/VMCore/DebugInfo.cpp and include/llvm/Analysis/DebugInfo.h to include/llvm/DebugInfo.h. >> >> Why? Because this module has
2012 Jun 27
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore
On Jun 27, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch, though large, simply moves lib/Analysis/DebugInfo.cpp to lib/VMCore/DebugInfo.cpp and include/llvm/Analysis/DebugInfo.h to include/llvm/DebugInfo.h. > > Why? Because this module has nothing to do with analysis. It simply defines an interface to the debug info MDNodes. In
2012 Jun 28
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > On Jun 27, 2012, at 4:20 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > > > > On Jun 27, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This patch, though large, simply moves lib/Analysis/DebugInfo.cpp to >
2013 Oct 21
1
Could not find kernel-debuginfo-2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64.rpm in debuginfo repo
Hi all, My CentOS 6.0 system kernel crashed, the original 2.6.32-71 x86_64 kernel was used, but I could not find the debuginfo package in debuginfo.centos.org repo. How can I got it? Regards, An Yang -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:
2017 Nov 04
2
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
llvm-profdata is part of llvm though. It’s perfectly fine for something in clang to depend on something in llvm. However, clang and lld are two independent llvm subprojects, neither of which can depend on each other. Generally speaking, from a layering perspective, if A depends on B and C, but B and C are independent, that should be reflected in the structure. For example, in CMake we will need
2017 Nov 03
2
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
Greetings, If you dont' care about running debuginfo-tests, and don't maintain a bot that runs debuginfo-tests, you can stop reading. I've uploaded a patch [https://reviews.llvm.org/D39605] that changes the way you run debuginfo-tests. Prior to this patch, the way to run them is to clone an external git repository into clang/test and then debuginfo-tests will happen transparently
2013 Jun 21
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> A summary of options for issue #3: >>> 3> To actually access the MDNode referenced via the hash value, we need to perform a
2017 Nov 06
3
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
IIUC you are mainly wanting to test LLD's PDB generation. Obviously a test suite plugged in under clang/test is not a good fit for that. It could arguably fit into the LLD project, but separating it out as a more end-to-end integration project a-la test-suite seems like a much better idea. Moving debuginfo-tests seems like a way to get a project in place with the right layering and maybe
2017 Nov 04
3
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
From the CI side moving this stuff around is a huge undertaking. We include this repo in every build, they will all need to be fixed and verified. It is a lot of work on our side. Is there a plan for both system to work side-by-side as we migrate jobs? Talking to Mike today, we estimated a week of work to migrate and verify, plus residual failures for the next month. Regarding your
2012 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM build fails using gcc-4.7.0 and -std=c++11 flags
I just updated my llvm sources (revision 164794.) and I see the error, "overriding non-deleted function" when building with gcc 4.7.0 and passing -std=c++11. /usr2/sidneym/llvm/tools/install/bin/c++ -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_DEBUG -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -std=c++11 -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -I/local/scratch/llvm-tmp/build/lib/VMCore
2013 Jun 21
5
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > A summary of options for issue #3: > 3> To actually access the MDNode referenced via the hash value, we need to perform a lookup from the hash value to find the corresponding MDNode. > The questions are where to store this map and how to keep it up-to-date when a MDNode is replaced. >
2013 Jun 21
16
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Manman Ren <mren at
2013 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> A summary of options for issue #3: >>>>
2017 Nov 04
2
PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:34 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > By adding in a different suite, you mean the lld part? I mean > theoretically, but that would be pretty awkward, because the idea behind > the lld requirement is that we want to make debuginfo-tests work with > clang-cl and CodeView debug info, and for this lld is a hard
2012 Sep 28
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM build fails using gcc-4.7.0 and -std=c++11 flags
I've fixed this specific error in r164813. Please let me know if there are more behind it. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Sid Manning <sidneym at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > I just updated my llvm sources (revision 164794.) and I see the error, > "overriding non-deleted function" when building with gcc 4.7.0 and passing > -std=c++11. > >
2013 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
A summary of options for issue #3: 3> To actually access the MDNode referenced via the hash value, we need to perform a lookup from the hash value to find the corresponding MDNode. The questions are where to store this map and how to keep it up-to-date when a MDNode is replaced. --------------------- Option a) a map in DwarfDebug, AsmWriter and DIBuilder, modify access functions in DI classes
2013 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> A summary of options for issue #3: >> 3> To actually access the MDNode referenced via the hash value, we need to perform a lookup from the hash value to find the corresponding MDNode. >> The questions are where to store this map
2007 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Antw.: 2.0 Pre-release tarballs online
> On Slackware 10.2 (GCC 3.3.6), I got an error during a debug build with the > header files using uintptr_t (not recognised as a type). Putting "#include > <stdint.h>" in include/llvm/BasicBlock.h (llvm) and in > "include/llvm/ValueSymbolTable.h" (frontend) resolved this. Ok. This is now fixed on the release branch. Thanks! > Also, I got linking
2013 Jun 21
5
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:18 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:52 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com>
2013 Jun 21
1
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Manman Ren <mren at