similar to: [LLVMdev] NIT: Include guards for include/llvm/Support/COFF.h

So, I'm trying to use this file to look inside COFF files. Got the header. OK. Now I want to look at the sections. Look, there's a section iterator. I can use that! So, I write: for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); ++iter ) and it doesn't compile. There's no ++ for section iterators. Apparently, you're supposed to

If you haven't already found it, you should look inside tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp, which is an easy-to-follow example of how these APIs work --Sean Silva. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com>wrote: > So, I'm trying to use this file to look inside COFF files. > Got the header. OK. > > Now I want to look at the sections.

On Nov 6, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > Binutils and LLVM > > As part of "owning our own toolchain", various people have expressed an interest and have been working on creating various tools that duplicate the functionality of tools available on other systems. I have summarized the information that I've gathered, and put it up

In a discussion on IRC, Micheal was complaining about the semantics of StringSet, specifically how the iterators work. DannyB mentioned that we have a Trie class, so I decided to check it out. Lo and behold, I couldn't find _any_ uses of it, and when I deleted it from my system and did a clean rebuild, everything was fine. Looking at the log, the last substantial change to this class was in

Delete it. =] Thanks. On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > In a discussion on IRC, Micheal was complaining about the semantics of > StringSet, specifically how the iterators work. > > DannyB mentioned that we have a Trie class, so I decided to check it out. > Lo and behold, I couldn't find _any_ uses of it, and when I deleted

On Jun 13, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like > > to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just > > bare

On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Hello! > > We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. > I've noticed that llvm-nm (as well as other tools) doesn't demangle C++ names. Is it true, that LLVM doesn't have the code that is capable > of that, and if yes, are there any

On May 21, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I found a bug in the expansion code for SUB going back to at least LLVM 2.6 and still shows up in trunk. > case ISD::SUB: { > EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0); > assert(TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::ADD, VT) && > TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::XOR, VT) && > "Don't

On Mar 12, 2013, at 7:36 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Renato, > >> The test is initializing srand(1), so in theory, it shouldn't be different >> between compilers, since Clang is using the same libraries. > > If Clang and GCC disagree on the same source, same machine and with > the same libraries, that certainly is odd. But it

Over the weekend I upgraded my system to Mac OS X 10.8, and now a clean cmake build fails. The error message: > Building C object runtime/libprofile/CMakeFiles/profile_rt-static.dir/CommonProfiling.c.o > cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wcovered-switch-default" The configuration: > Mac OS X 10.8 > CMake 2.8.8 > LLVM tot > Apple clang version 4.0

There's a typo on the confirmation page at <http://www.llvm.org/devmtg/talk.php> when you submit a session proposal for the developer's conference. "Sponsorsip" I'll be happy to fix it if someone could point me at the right place in svn. -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists at gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95

On Aug 11, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote: > I haven't found an LLVM or Clang users' list--is there such a thing? Yes. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists at gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly

On Oct 29, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Ok. If no-one has an objection, then putting it in the release notes (and the announcement email!) makes sense. We can make the switch a few weeks after the release if no one has strongly objected. > > So far,

On Feb 14, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: > Author: hhinnant > Date: Fri Feb 14 15:09:01 2014 > New Revision: 201432 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=201432&view=rev > Log: Remove myself as owner of libc++ > > Modified: > llvm/trunk/CODE_OWNERS.TXT > > Modified: llvm/trunk/CODE_OWNERS.TXT > URL:

Binutils and LLVM As part of "owning our own toolchain", various people have expressed an interest and have been working on creating various tools that duplicate the functionality of tools available on other systems. As a start, I'd like to summarize the current status, and ask people for help updating the list. List taken from <http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/>

I found a bug in the expansion code for SUB going back to at least LLVM 2.6 and still shows up in trunk. case ISD::SUB: { EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0); assert(TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::ADD, VT) && TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::XOR, VT) && "Don't know how to expand this subtraction!"); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::XOR, dl,

Hello! We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. I've noticed that llvm-nm (as well as other tools) doesn't demangle C++ names. Is it true, that LLVM doesn't have the code that is capable of that, and if yes, are there any plans to add it? Depending on something like libiberty.a doesn't seem like a

Michael, would it be possible for you to plant a strategically placed block comment explaining the situation with the "pointless" error_code stuff, like you explained to me? I'm not sure where is best, but it is worth having written down somewhere. --Sean Silva On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:41

# Everything is done on Mac OS X 10.8.4, with llvm/clang/libc++/libc++abi built from source this morning # totclang is an alias for the built clang. $ export LLVM=/Sources/LLVM $ export LIBCXX=$LLVM/libcxx $ export LIBCXXABI=$LLVM/libcxxabi $ totclang -std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++ -I $LIBCXX/include -fsanitize=undefined ubsan.cpp -L $LIBCXX/lib -L $LIBCXXABI/lib -lc++abi $

That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or should I just grab them using wget? 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd > like > > to begin gradually extending