similar to: [LLVMdev] how to get path profile information ?

What version of LLVM are you using? The profiling framework is completely messed up in the newer versions of LLVM.. I used to work with profiling in 2.5 some time ago, and it seemed to work fine.. If you really need this to work quickly, you might want to just get the old version and get on with it.. The newer versions of LLVM need to get the profiling part fixed soon..It is messing up my work as

Hi all, Unfortunately, all my Hunks are failed when I apply : patch -p1 < da.patch command. The problem might be due to the fact that da.patch file was created against revision 167549, but I am on revision 167719 (I believe the most recent one). I am not sure if this cause the problem ? But Preston may I ask you to generate the patch file against revison 167719 ? Thanks in advance. On

On 13.11.2012, at 10:46, erkan diken <erkandiken at gmail.com> wrote: Hi all, Unfortunately, all my Hunks are failed when I apply : patch -p1 < da.patch command. The problem might be due to the fact that da.patch file was created against revision 167549, but I am on revision 167719 (I believe the most recent one). I am not sure if this cause the problem ? But Preston may I ask you to

Dear all, I want to build an LLVM pass by using CMake. After reading the ralevant part of the documentation ( http://llvm.org/releases/3.1/docs/CMake.html#passdev), I copied the files in the llvm/lib/Transforms/Hello to another folder in order to give a try. Then I renamed the folder as Hello2. Then I have changed CMakeLists.txt as following: cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8) # A

erkan diken <erkandiken at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > It seems that cmake is ok. When I run make install, it gives errors (see > below) and i think the reason is that it can not find the directory to llvm > header files. > I could not figure it out which variable to set and how to use it in order > to point the required directory ? > ( as in the make pass build which

Hello, I'm currently trying to develop new LLVM Pass that will generate simple data dependencies graph. For now I'm trying to get familiar with DependenceAnalysis. My general idea is to traverse each function (runOnFunction) top to bottom Instruction by Instruction, using DA.depends( I, I2, ...) on every Instructions combination in function to check if they are dependent on any

Take a look to this page: https://sites.google.com/site/parallelizationforllvm/ On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Valmico <valmico88 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm currently trying to develop new LLVM Pass that will generate simple > data dependencies graph. For now I'm trying to get familiar with > DependenceAnalysis. > My general idea is to traverse each

Hi Duncan, A DragonEgg/GCC-related question: do you know where these strange FRAME tokens originate from (e.g. %struct.FRAME.matmul)? Compiling simple Fortran code with DragonEgg: > cat matmul.f90 subroutine matmul(nx, ny, nz) implicit none integer :: nx, ny, nz real, dimension(nx, ny) :: A real, dimension(ny, nz) :: B real, dimension(nx, nz) :: C integer :: i, j, k real,

Hi, When I test "matmul" in the polly directory, I get the following performance data: //=============================== --> 12. Compare the runtime of the executables time ./matmul.normalopt.exe 0:23.53 real, 23.48 user, 0.00 sys time ./matmul.polly.interchanged.exe 0:22.86 real, 22.82 user, 0.01 sys time ./matmul.polly.interchanged+tiled.exe 0:22.87 real, 22.83 user, 0.00 sys

Hi, I am new to LLVM, and would like to write a dynamic profiler, say which prints out the load address of all the load instructions encountered in a program. >From what I could pick up, edge-profiler.cpp increments a counter dynamically which is somehow dumped onto llvmprof.out by profile.pl Could anyone explain me how this works? Can I instrument the code to dump out the load addresses or

Hi everyone, I'll be very thankful if anyone can help me. I want to extract the dependences details by using polly. I followed the following steps on example code matmul.c: 1. clang -S -emit-llvm matmul.c -o matmul.s 2. opt -S -polly-canonicalize matmul.s > matmul.preopt.ll 3. opt -basicaa -polly-dependences -analyze matmul.preopt.ll But it doesn't show me the dependences. I

Dear All, I've had trouble compiling DPpackage as a user in one system. It works fine as root in other machines. I can see any clues in error messages My guess is that it is a permissions matter. Any help is appreciated. OS: Linux Kernel: 2.6.27 SMP Arch: Intel 64 bits gfortran not available Thank you. ----------------------><8------------------------------------- g77 ? -fpic ?-g

Preston, thanks for the explanation and patch. Now it's printing the direction and distance values. On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Preston Briggs <preston.briggs at gmail.com>wrote: > Erkan, you're right. Sorry about that. > Attached is the most recent version. > > Preston > > > > Hi Preston, >> I am trying to use DA as well. I used your example

Erkan, you're right. Sorry about that. Attached is the most recent version. Preston Hi Preston, > I am trying to use DA as well. I used your example and commands that you > wrote in order to get DA information. > However, it does not report any dependence info. > I am wondering whether your local copy differs from the one on the > repository ? > Thanks. > Erkan.

Hello everybody, I am a beginner in LLVM and need to know how to use LLVM to instrument a C program and execute this instrumented program with different test cases to determine the branch coverage information for each test case. Any suggestion or help is more than welcomed. Thanks in advance. Ahmed Raafat. -- View this message in context:

Hi gang, time for my weekly confusion... (I'm trying not to bombard the board with questions) The thing that's on my mind at the moment (there's some backend-stuff that I'm just working my way though) is that I'm not getting very far when trying to get LLVM to profile code - I'm looking for nothing more special than list of how many times each basic block has been called

Hi Guys, I noticed that the operation actions( promote/expand/custom) are set per operation basis. Wondering if we can set it up globally? For example, I have native supported 32 bits registers, to handle 8 bits value operations, I want to do promote. and to support 64 bit operations, I want to expand. If I can set up the operation actions for the same type globally, then I can avoid to

Hi everyone! Here, I have a question and am curious about i128. I want to know how the LLVM handle i128, because many compiler backend doesn't support i128 directly. So I am very curious and want to how the llvm handle this situation? Besides i128, such as i256, i512, even i24? Thanks. Best Regards Wu Zhao -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hi, I have a problem - looking for advice. I have a source code file with two functions which are compiled into a .bc file. When the bitcode file is loaded, I can dump the module and see the two functions: ... ; Materializable ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable define void @matmul(double*, double*, double*, i32, i32, i32) #0 {} ; Materializable ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind

Hi Ahmed! Adventure wrote: > Hello everybody, I am a beginner in LLVM and need to know how to use > LLVM to instrument a C program and execute this instrumented program > with different test cases to determine the branch coverage information > for each test case. Any suggestion or help is more than welcomed. Thanks > in advance. Ahmed Raafat. (In the following instructions you