similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm::Type as llvm::Value in metadata

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:55 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Frenkel > <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Marcus Frenkel <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:55 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Frenkel >> <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've a

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Frenkel <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a subclass of llvm::Value), but llvm::Type is not? Should they not - technically seen - be equal? llvm::Function

Hi, I stumbled upon a strange thing regarding types and module linking, which I don't quite get, so maybe someone around here can enlighten me. Consider the following code, which will create 2 modules m1 and m2, and a named structured type %T = { i32 }; m1 contains only a function definition f(%T), m2 contains a function declaration f(%T) and a function definition h(%T), where h will call f

Hi Marcus, > And to ask a concrete question: is there any way to store a reference to a llvm::Type within the LLVM metadata? Not directly, but you can store a null value (Constant::getNullValue()) of the respective type. Cheers, Clemens -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6392 bytes Desc:

I've tripped over this behaviour as well. I ended up working around the problem by creating a new context every time I wanted to link modules together. Which led to me accidently generating one module using two different contexts. Which isn't an error that is detected by module verification. It only causes issues for comparisons like Type equality that compare pointers, and those types of

Hi rsync'ers. What can you recommend to create the initial backup of a partition before calling rsync (under Linux, 100 GB, 10M files, only normal files and some soft links)? (Using rsync takes too long for this initial copy.) Here are some candidates: 1. star -copy -no-fsync -p -xdot -C $1 . $2 2. tar -C $1 -cf - . | tar -C $2 -xf - 3. cp -a $1 $2 4. cpio ... ... Any experiences?

Hi all. I once tried to rsync around 100 GB (10 million files), but version 2.6.6 needed too much RAM and was too slow. Is one of the snapshots stable enough to try this again? Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Somebody made it possible to use DirectShow video codecs in OGG framework... Now get ready for DivX OGG files :) <http://www.stud.fernuni-hagen.de/q5045045/> -- Jernej Simoncic, jernej.simoncic@guest.arnes.si http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 The intelligence of any discussion diminishes with the square of the number of participants. -- Walinsky's Law

Greetings, I'm developing a FUSE-based file system which will be exported to the Windows-world via Samba. My file system is emulating NTFS Alternate Data Streams by creating the content of those files "on the fly" on access. This works quite well with Samba 3.4.6 and the ":Zone.Identifier" stream. But the Windows clients don't even try to access the

Hi. I get the feeling it's time to turn this list into a moderated one ... Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20070828/aa56db7a/attachment.bin

What is the maximum transfer rate allowed for rsync? I mean the limitations? I can't get more than 50Mbit speed in my gigabit lan, with rsync server or with ssh. ftp transfers reach >400Mbit , so it is not a lan or nic problem. Maybe it has something to do with my cpu limitations? or the limitations for rsync is the 50Mb/s? Here is my rsyncd.conf if it helps > # by gourgi > max

Hi all. I prepared a mirror (that is intended to be updated by rsync) by doing the initial copy using cpio (for efficiency on 15 million files). Unfortunately, user, group, and mtime of some directories and files was copied incorrectly. Can I use rsync (GIT) to fix this? Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

Here's a question I have: My understanding is that OGG is a 'containter' format, allowing for multiple streams of multiple types, of which Vorbis is only one. My question is this: Is it feasable (and, considering licencing, leagal) to create an .ogg file that contains, say Indeo or Cinepak video? (In other words, use the ogg bitstream to store the data rather than .avi).

Added the line as above: 'IPQoS lowdelay throughput', restarted the SSH service, tried SSH-ing and Git-ing... same error as before: 'packet_write_wait: Connection to X.X.X.X port 22: Broken pipe'. ________________________________ From: Zach Cheung <kuroro.zhang at gmail.com> Sent: 29 August 2018 07:17 To: ohadfjunkbox at outlook.com Cc: dtucker at dtucker.net;

The virtualization is VMware Workstation 12.x, NOT Fusion. Again, I'd like to point that downgrading to 7.7p2 "solved" the issue and that I'm using the same virtualization software for ages (which makes me disbelieve the issue lies with it). I've seen the comment about zero-length passwords... I'm not techie enough to understand the code there (or the technical

On 2/2/12 1:51 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 02/02/12 13:30, Clemens Hammacher wrote: >> On 2/2/12 1:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> I have to ask: why are you writing these modules out as separate bc files? >> >> I knew that someone would ask that ;) >> We need to have separate modules during runtime. One of them contains the code >> that is actually JIT

Hi. Environment: * OS: Antergos Linux (Fully updated daily) (Running as a guest on VM). * OpenSSH: 7.8p1 Description: Immediately upon creating a successful SSH tunnel login, the connection is dropped with the "packet_write_wait: Connection to X.X.X.X port 22: Broken pipe" error. I've verified the issue is due to OpenSSH 7.8p1 in the following ways: * Use a

Hi Chris, thanks for your answer! On 2/2/12 1:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > The linker has to solve the exact same problem (read multiple .bc files and unify types across them). This is the impetus behind TypeMapTy in lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp. You'll probably need to do something like that. I already looked into that. The linker is using the GlobalValues of both modules to identify

Hi, I have this call instruction to printf inserted which is causing an assertion failure. Any pointers to where I am wrong : Code Dump : Function *printFn=M.getNamedFunction(std::string("printf")); Constant *str=ConstantArray::get("Value : %d\n"); std::vector<Value *> Args(2); std::vector<Constant *> GEPIndices(2);