similar to: [LLVMdev] complete llvm ports

Hi All, I just added this table: http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#targetfeatures To help explain what features are supported by what targets. We've long had a variety of vague statements on various web pages, and having a centralized place that lists all the supported targets and what features they have seems useful. Improvements and additions are welcome. I don't know the

On 24 October 2010 17:21, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > I just added this table: > http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#targetfeatures Hi Chris, That's great! I didn't know ARM back-end had support for inline assembly. If there is no assembly parser, does it call gas in a special way? -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital

On Nov 1, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Tony Linthicum wrote: > Hello all, > > We would like to contribute a new backend for Qualcomm's Hexagon > processor. We will actively maintain the port once it is accepted. > Hexagon is a VLIW core that is used principally in modem and low power > audio applications in Qualcomm's chip sets. > > We have a patch for both llvm and for

On 11/1/2011 3:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > If relevant, I'd suggest splitting it up as: > > 1. Changes to LLVM code outside your target directory. > 2. Your new target directory. > 3. Clang patches. > > As others have pointed out, you really do need some basic regression tests to make sure that the backend is working. Also, make sure to update this: >

Hello all, We would like to contribute a new backend for Qualcomm's Hexagon processor. We will actively maintain the port once it is accepted. Hexagon is a VLIW core that is used principally in modem and low power audio applications in Qualcomm's chip sets. We have a patch for both llvm and for clang. As this is a new port, these patches are quite large (approximately 26k and 3k

Hi, I think it's an awesome idea to make sure all names are logical. It is an essential feature of a good API to have logical naming :) > I really dislike that all the files and classes in the MC library > start with MC. This is c++, not c :( On a similar note, all the classes in clang/CodeGen are prefixed with CG or even CodeGen, could those be renamed as well? And speaking of the

Hello, While trying to find out why the LDC compiler refuses to generate object code for MSP430 targets (but generates MSP430 assembly or LLVM IR/bitcode), I came across the following apparent inconsistency. This works: $ clang --target=msp430 -c test.c This doesn't work: $ clang --target=msp430 -S -emit-llvm test.c $ llc -filetype=obj test.ll /opt/msp430/bin/llc: target does not support

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 5 September 2010 19:32, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > I've carefully studied the source code of CGDebugInfo in clang as a > working > > example. One puzzlement is that there's a discrepancy between what the > > "source level debugging with LLVM" docs

Hi Justin, I believe the PTX section in the link below need some love, updating "lib/Target/PTX" to "lib/Target/NVPTX" for example. Would you like to take a look? http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#the-ptx-backend Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667

On 6 September 2010 01:05, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > DISubprogram CodeGenerator::genDISubprogram(const FunctionDefn * fn, (...) >         false /* isDefinition */, (...) Hi Talin, The only difference from what I'm doing is that I only export debug symbols in definitions, not declarations. I may be doing wrong, though, for multi-file compilation (haven't tested

On 12/15/2012 12:53 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all > that we have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I

Hi All, When seeing the title "Prolog/Epilog Code Insertion", I'd expect something about XXXFrameLowering.cpp (particular about emitPrologue/emitEpilogue). But the document [1] is about unwind. Is it placed at the right place/section? Thanks. [1] http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#prolog-epilog-code-insertion Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage:

I was reading various documents in the llvm/docs/ directory and found a few minor typos. I don't have write access so if someone could apply these for me, that would be great. --- Index: docs/LangRef.rst =================================================================== --- docs/LangRef.rst (revision 228410) +++ docs/LangRef.rst (working copy) @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ The idea

CodeGenerator updates committed. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Justin Holewinski < justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > Right, I forgot to update that originally. I also have a separate > document in the works that goes into more detail for NVPTX. > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) < > chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > >>

Right, I forgot to update that originally. I also have a separate document in the works that goes into more detail for NVPTX. On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 AM, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) < chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > I believe the PTX section in the link below need some love, > updating "lib/Target/PTX" to "lib/Target/NVPTX" for example.

I was able to compile LLVM on windows (llvm2.3) using Visual studio. When I type llc -help command, I do not see -view-isel-dags option (http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html document mentions about it). Is this option is supported on Windows (or Cygwin) build? Thanks a bunch, -Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I was reading about the order of optimizations in the code generation stage here: http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#the-high-level-design-of-the-code-generator This is the part that's interesting to me: 3. SSA-based Machine Code Optimizations<http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#ssa-based-machine-code-optimizations>— This optional stage consists of a series of machine-code

is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? if so, are there public build bots for this? is lnt going to replace test-suite as the normal mechanism for running test-suite? Tia. Reed

On 4 June 2013 22:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? > AFAIK, yes. http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html if so, are there public build bots for this? > We have one: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt Setting it up was just copy&paste on Zorg's config (and fixing the bugs

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I have an approved target independent putback and i've run all that we > have at Mips as well as on x86 " make TEST=simple" > > Is there anything else that is easy to run that I can do before doing the > commit? > > The patch touches a number of basic classes so I'm just