similar to: [LLVMdev] x86 asm to LLVM IR conversion

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by

On 3/12/15 8:14 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ahmed Bougacha > <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com <mailto:ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: > >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some > >> supported target) to LLVM IR?

Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like something that would be feasible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150312/36eae2e4/attachment.html>

I am looking for a way to convert an x86 .s file into llvm IR. I don't need a fully automated method but I'd like to avoid a fully manual one :) I've seen the nearly 5 year old llvm-qemu project. Are there any more recent projects that get me part or all of the way to my goal? I don't mind banging out some code but I'd rather not start from scratch. Thanks for any pointers

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Sergey Yakoushkin <sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, yes, I'm facing the same issue. > > Hm... seems there are no simple fixes. > I have to do one more i64 mul implementation to workaround aggressive > optimizations. > Is that correct? Is this the only way? This shouldn't be necessary, IMO. If you were going to

Hello. Look at this: [sergey@gleam sergey]$ uname -s -m -r Linux 2.4.17 i586 [sergey@gleam sergey]$ mount | grep /home /dev/hda11 on /home type ext3 (rw) [sergey@gleam sergey]$ pwd /home/sergey [sergey@gleam sergey]$ id uid=502(sergey) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),10(wheel),13(news),512(ftpadmin),513(dos) [sergey@gleam sergey]$ stat . File: "." Size: 8192 Blocks: 16

> This shouldn't be necessary, IMO. If you were going to implement it, > then the correct thing to do would be to have generic selection dag > lowering of large multiplies, which renders the library mostly > useless. In fact, I would prefer to avoid custom lowering for operations on large types. i64 will be rare in my case (embedded) and their performance is not an issue. I need

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Jevin Sweval <jevinsweval at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:57 AM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> Hi - >> >> Not sure if anyone else saw this or cares about a decompiler (not personally >> tested) >> https://github.com/draperlaboratory/fracture >> >> I wonder if

Hi, I recently downloaded and installed the libcpu package (from http://libcpu.org ) that uses llvm as the backend on my linux machine. I have a piece of Motorola 88100 code (essentially the output of the 176.gcc benchmark from SPEC CPU 2000) that I am trying to run using this emulator, but I am running into errors when trying to run it. Has anyone been able to successfully use the m88k

Hi, Are there any plans (ongoing works) to implement hazards recognizers for in-order x86 processors (e.g. Atom)? Regards, Sergey Yakoushkin

Hi, I've developed editor prototype for TableGen files (td). It is Eclipse plugin based on IMP project (The IDE Meta-Tooling Platform). Editor has outline, folding, coloring, go to definition, etc. As any prototype, editor has some limitations (e.g. no cross-file indexing). If there is any interest to such tool I will improve it a bit and then publish. Also considering llvm asm (ll) editing

Timo, Is it possible to limit replication scope with INBOX namespace only ? Best regards, Sergey Schwartz Senior System Administrator Biblio Globus Tour Operator www.bgoperator.ru T: +7 495 5042500 ext 1532 E: sergey.schwartz at bgoperator.com 08.09.2015 13:24, Timo Sirainen ?????: > On 08 Sep 2015, at 11:20, Sergey Schwartz <sergey.schwartz at bgoperator.com> wrote: >> I use

What kinds of errors are you getting? On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Pradeep Ramachandran <pramach2 at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Hi, > I recently downloaded and installed the libcpu package (from http://libcpu.org > ) that uses llvm as the backend on my linux machine. I have a piece of > Motorola 88100 code (essentially the output of the 176.gcc benchmark > from SPEC CPU 2000) that

Hi Sergey, Thanks for putting the new version of the document together! I don't see any other issues. I strongly believe the approach described in the document is a nice way to get OpenMP offloading support in clang. I plan to start actively contributing code for this component of the OpenMP implementation soon. Thanks again, Samuel 2015-04-29 11:47 GMT-04:00 Sergey Ostanevich

Out of curiosity, how would you envision fast-math flags interacting with constant expressions? Off the top of my head, I can’t think of any flags that would be relevant if the expression can just be constant-folded away at full precision anyways. > On Nov 28, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Sergey Dmitrouk <sdmitrouk at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > > Doesn't look like a bug, more like a

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work at gmail.com> wrote: > > On (06/14/19 11:50), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > dmesg > > > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: GPU lockup - switching to software fbcon > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: fifo: SCHED_ERROR 0a [CTXSW_TIMEOUT] > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: fifo: runlist 0: scheduled for

Steffen, 2.2.18 (2de3c7248922) Best regards, Sergey Schwartz Senior System Administrator Biblio Globus Tour Operator www.bgoperator.ru T: +7 495 5042500 ext 1532 E: sergey.schwartz at bgoperator.com 22.07.2015 12:16, Steffen Kaiser ?????: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Sergey Schwartz wrote: > >> Should I report a bug or there

Hi, Is there anyone else interested in fixed-point arithmetic support in clang/llvm? Regards, Sergey On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Sergey Yakoushkin < sergey.yakoushkin at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Were there any further discussion or progress with the fixed point support > (ISO/IEC TR 18037) in the meantime? >

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:48 AM Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work at gmail.com> wrote: > > On (06/19/19 01:20), Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Sergey Senozhatsky > > <sergey.senozhatsky.work at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On (06/14/19 11:50), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > > dmesg > > > >

Hello Sergey, I'd be interested in such a plugin. At one time somebody else started a plugin to cause Eclipse to compile with LLVM-GCC but I hadn't heard anything else from them. I've been just modifying the commands manually for that. I have definitely not heard of a .td or .ll syntax highlighter plugin. --Sam ----- Original Message ---- > From: Sergey Yakoushkin