similar to: [LLVMdev] tail call optimization question

Hi There, I get the following error from the code pasted below: Error in storage.mode(test) <- "logical" : object 'HGBmt12_Natl_Ave_or_Facility' not found library(RODBC) library(car) setwd("c://temp//cms") a07.connect <- odbcConnectAccess2007("DFC.accdb") sqlTables(a07.connect) ##provides list of tables## dataset <-

Dear guys, I am having problem to split edges correctly. Mostly because the new basic blocks are creating infinite loops. Could someone help me fixing the code below? It is creating assembly like this one below. Block LBB1_9 was inserted to break the critical edge between blocks LBB1_3 and LBB1_8. But it changes the semantics of the original program, because, before, LBB1_8 was falling

The problem is that you are inserting block 9 in the wrong spot. mf.getLastBlock() returns the block with the greatest number which may have nothing to do with the ordering. Why not use the end iterator (mf.end) to insert? -Tanya On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > > Dear guys, > > I am having problem to split edges correctly. Mostly because the new

Dear Sir, I got a problem with my program. I would like to classify my data using bagging support vector machine ensemble. I split my data into training data and test data. For a given data sets TR(X), K replicated training data sets are first randomly generated by bootstrapping technique with replacement. Next, Support Vector Mechine (SVM) is applied for each bootstrap data sets. Finally, the

Something has changed in the last few days that breaks thumb-2 (and possibly all ARM) assembly output. Some, but not all lines are double- spaced, for example: fstd d13, [sp, #+40] fstd d12, [sp, #+32] fstd d11, [sp, #+24] fstd d10, [sp, #+16] fstd d9, [sp, #+8] fstd d8, [sp] sub sp, sp, #872 mov r4, r1 mov r5, r0 cmp r0, #2 ble LBB1_133 @ entry.bb2.i_crit_edge LBB1_1: @

Hi Warren, you can try to configure with the following export CFLAGS="-m64" export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64" LLVM: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --enable-optimized --enable-jit --enable-targets=host-only make LLVM-GCC: ../llvm-gcc4-2.0.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/warren/llvm/obj/ --enable-languages=c,c++

Avi: Thank you for checking. I think the optimization is limited. If test is all TRUE or all FALSE then at most one vector is evaluated. Anything beyond that would be very complicated. (Inspect the two expressions and verify that both specify elementwise computations. Then use indexing to shrink the input properly. Take into account all recycling rules for binary operations.) > ifelse(0:1,

Hi Warren, You have the -m32 flag set, but it's still giving you this: > Warning: Generation of 64-bit code for a 32-bit processor requested. > Warning: 64-bit processors all have at least SSE2. But are you sure you want to compile the LLVM-GCC source? You should use the binaries unless absolutely necessary. -bw On May 24, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Warren Armstrong wrote: > Hi all,

I'm stuck on queues! The way I read what documentation I have found, if I set up a queue like this: [general] persistentmembers = yes [testq] musiconhold=default strategy = ringall timeout = 10 retry = 5 context = testing member => SIP/100 and then add into extensions something like this: [incomingiax] exten => 1234,1,Dial(SIP/100,10) exten => 1234,2,Queue(testq|tTH|||300)

Hi Bjorn, could you file a bug on llvm.org/bugs and cc me on it. Thanks, Arnold > So it appears that also the ARM backend has a big problems with sign-extending loads. > > I've compiled the following loop > > short in[]; > int out[]; > int value; > > for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { > value = in[i]; > if (value>2047) >

I don't know much about this, but maybe -mllvm -unroll-count=1 can be used as a workaround? /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Brent Walker Sent: den 28 mars 2012 03:18 To: llvmdev Subject: [LLVMdev] Suboptimal code due to excessive spilling Hi, I have run into the following strange behavior

Hi Guys, I am having trouble trying to get format_mp3 working to play music on hold. I have followed the instructions in the read-me and the wiki however it seems after un-installing mpg123, asterisk is not even attempting to play MOH. My musiconhold.conf is ; Music on hold class definitions ; [classes] [moh_files] default = >/var/lib/asterisk/moh-native ;default =>

Hi, my situation is: incoming call goes into the queue and is picked up by callback agent. The agent then wants to transfer the call to another device (another SIP phone). But 'transfer' button doesn't work and '#' button attempts to start channel monitor. Tried with both Queue(testq) and Queue(testq,tT). Is it meant as a feature that agents won't transfer calls at

Can someone tell me why this is not valid... [start] exten => 1000,1,Answer exten => 1000,2,Wait,1 exten => 1000,3,AgentcallbackLogin(1000||2000@Local) exten => 2000,1,Macro(DialProxy,115551212) exten => 3000,1,Queue(testq||||45) while this is: [start] exten => 1000,1,Answer exten => 1000,2,Wait,1 exten => 1000,3,AgentcallbackLogin(1000||2000@start) exten =>

Hi, I have run into the following strange behavior and wanted to ask for some advice. For the C program below, function sum() gets inlined in foo() but the code generated looks very suboptimal (the code is an extract from a larger program). Below I show the 32-bit x86 assembly as produced by the demo page on the llvm home page ("Output A"). As you can see from the assembly, after

done, bug 15057, hope I submitted it correctly ... On 23 Jan 2013, at 22:29, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > could you file a bug on llvm.org/bugs and cc me on it. > > Thanks, > Arnold > > >> So it appears that also the ARM backend has a big problems with sign-extending loads. >> >> I've compiled the

Hi, I have a 3 way gluster 4 setup. I had a "mishap" of some sort and I lost node no2. There was and is 660gb spare on no1 and no3 but no2 is so full I cannot mount it at boot, nor manually. I was making a 80gb VM so no idea what happened, nor how to fix it? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi R users,I am a beginner in the use of R. I need urgent help for my thesis study. <https://stats.stackexchange.com/posts/633206/timeline> I have daily air pollution parameters PM10, PM2.5 CO, NO2, SO2, and O3. I also have daily hospital admission numbers. Taking into account the effect of weekends and holidays, I would like to used generalised additive model (GAM) to explore the

> You're misreading the asm... nothing is touching memory. (BTW, "leal > -1(%eax), %eax" isn't a memory operation; it's just subtracting one > from %eax.) You might want to try reading the LLVM IR (which you can > generate with llvm-gcc -S -emit-llvm); it tends to be easier to read. I tried that, but I'm still learning LLVM. Seeing indvar, phi nodes, tail

[Perhaps someone could rename this list to dtrace-matt-problems-discuss?] If I run this script against my binary (which contains a USDT probe called ''concurrentq-latency''): ::: / probename == "concurrentq-latency" / { printf("[%s]:[%s]:[%s]\n", probeprov, probefunc, probename); } I get this output: dtrace: script ''testq.d'' matched 46056