similar to: [LLVMdev] Extend named metadata support in the LLVM C API

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm working on an LLVM-based Go compiler as a hobby project. I'm using Go > bindings to the LLVM C API, and have found that the latter does not have > full support for named metadata, which means I can't (easily/sensibly) > export debug information. Namely, you

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > > I'll advocate for folks looking at these patches where I can, but I wanted > to give you a bit of a heads up -- many of the regular contributors (and > reviewers) who would be qualified to review this patch are on vacation for > the holidays and may be very slow to respond. > >

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:38 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd be happy to do it, but this is a bit much high level for me to be > actionable. Can you explain me what I should do to reintroduce them int he > debian packaging ? > On the CMake side, I'm not sure. I think it's just a matter of using the "install()" functions to install them

On Sun, 1 May 2016 at 16:12 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: > Some update on this. > > 2016-04-12 18:48 GMT-07:00 Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com>: > >> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:38 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'd be happy to do it, but this is a bit much high level for me to be >>>

LLVM Weekly - #1, Jan 6th 2014 ============================== Welcome to the inaugural issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. I've been a long time lurker on the LLVM and Clang mailing lists and have been using LLVM extensively in my PhD research for the past 4 years. I thought it might be worthwhile to

That did it, thanks for the help! For the future is there a set of documentation for these bindings, or their equivalent c functions? I tried looking but was having trouble finding anything that seemed to match. On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:35 AM Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 at 00:32 Brian Picciano via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 08:10 Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'd like to shime in here. These apt repository used to contain packages > named llvm-3.8-tools containing, amongst other things, the lit python > library used to test llvm. It seems that it went away recently and I have > travis build failing because of this. > > What is

Thanks - I'll try this tonight. Assuming it works, should these variables be added to the docs at http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html ? On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 at 11:02 David Jones via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Now that autoconf is going away soon, I

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 at 05:55 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, Peter, > > I took a look at the results of running govet on the go bindings - there > are a lot of small/simple problems that should probably be looked at. Wrong > number of arguments a few times, shifts by > 32, etc. > Did you just run "go vet

Hi Andrew, Peter, I took a look at the results of running govet on the go bindings - there are a lot of small/simple problems that should probably be looked at. Wrong number of arguments a few times, shifts by > 32, etc. https://golang.org/cmd/vet/ Thanks! -eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 at 00:32 Brian Picciano via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I have the following code to generate a really basic IR: > http://gobin.io/LtdJ > > And the output I get from it is: http://gobin.io/XgkH > > That IR code which is dumped seems to work fine if I do llc then gcc on > it, so I'm not sure why it won't work through the

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:02 AM Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 at 01:43 Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM Jonathan Roelofs < >> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >>> Even further off topic, in phab wishlist land: It'd be awesome if it >>> were

I have the following code to generate a really basic IR: http://gobin.io/LtdJ And the output I get from it is: http://gobin.io/XgkH That IR code which is dumped seems to work fine if I do llc then gcc on it, so I'm not sure why it won't work through the engine. This is my first time using LLVM so I'm pretty new with all of it, any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! - Brian

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 at 08:19 Stephen Cross <scross at scross.co.uk> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I was wondering if anyone could answer the questions in my first > email. These were: > > * Why does Clang generate 8 byte alignment for 16+ byte arrays on > x86-64, even though the AMD64 ABI seems to require 16 byte alignment? > * Clang has some logic in

Now that autoconf is going away soon, I figured I'd try building using CMake. I checked out llvm, cfe and lldb from the SVN server, and followed the basic build instructions. cmake -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/tools/llvm/svn_head -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;CppBackend" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON ../llvm Everything worked well, and in

On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 at 06:02 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Stephen Cross" <scross at scross.co.uk> > > To: "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com> > > Cc: "Clang Developers List" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "LLVM Developers > Mailing List" <llvmdev at

R has a very wide audience, clinical research, astronomy, psychology, and so on and so on. I would consider data analysis work to be three stages: data preparation, statistical analysis, and producing the report. This regards the process of getting the data ready for analysis and reporting, sometimes called "data cleaning" or "data munging" or "data wrangling". So as

It seems that when setting qualify = 200 or qualify = yes in the database for a sip friend/peer, RealTime does not update the registration status like it should. I also have several peers which have been offline and Asterisk still reports them as registered, even though the registration seconds are only 200. Asterisk Ver: CVS HEAD 12/1/2004 Layout of sip_buddies: mysql> describe

Hi, I want to prevent Asterisk from sending the h extension across to the SIP provider or to prevent it from hitting the script at all. The SIP Provider does not know what to do with the h extensions once it receives it. My SIP Provider takes all digits and forwards them off to a softswitch for processing. Everytime a call hangs up, it complains about running AGI scripts on hungup

Hi, I''ve been doing some experiments with php and if can use something like <?php for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++) { echo "hello world"; flush(); sleep(10); } ?> to keep a http link open for an arbitrary amount of time and routinely display "hello world" in the browser window. Is is possible to write a mongrel handler to do something similar? Thanks