similar to: [LLVMdev] Setting Moderator Bits

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Setting Moderator Bits"

2011 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] Setting Moderator Bits
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:52 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > Dear All, > > Are people setting the "moderated" bit on their subscriptions to > llvm-commits?  I'm seeing several people who are subscribed but have > their moderated bit set, and so I keep seeing emails seeing that I need > to approve their posts. I think I'm one of such
2012 Dec 04
3
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
Currently the replacement of allocation routines is based on creating a new malloc zone and a new CFAllocator (because the allocator replacement is done later than it could be, we must have both). This makes us depend on CoreFoundation to call CFAllocatorSetDefault. Because of some bugs in CF which start firing after CFAllocatorSetDefault, we have to add several hacks to circumvent the effects of
2012 Dec 04
3
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
+kledzik at apple.com The dynamic runtime is using dylib interposition (google for "__DATA,__interpose). If I'm understanding correctly (Nick, can you please confirm this?) this allows to interpose the function regardless of the two-level namespace. The support for dynamic runtime in ASan is almost there. But the new interposition method has revealed some issues with the allocator which
2013 Nov 19
1
[LLVMdev] Broken build: r194813
Hi, can you please check the problem is fixed by r195125? On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com> wrote: > Hi Cameron, > > I'm planning to address this issue today. > > HTH, > Alex > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Cameron McInally > <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu> wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> My local
2012 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:36:18AM -0800, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > Currently the replacement of allocation routines is based on creating > a new malloc zone and a new CFAllocator (because the allocator > replacement is done later than it could be, we must have both). This > makes us depend on CoreFoundation to call CFAllocatorSetDefault. > Because of some bugs in CF which start
2013 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] Broken build: r194813
Hey guys, My local build is broken after: >r194813 | glider | 2013-11-15 08:13:01 -0500 (Fri, 15 Nov 2013) | 2 lines > >[ASan] Add the configure+make rules for building the ASan runtime for iOS > simulator. Tim Northover was kind enough to track this down to a dependency on the “iphonesimulator” SDK. How should this issue be resolved? I'm currently following the receipe to build
2003 Apr 07
7
Should List be Moderated?
In light of recent flame baits and advertisements sent to the list, I would like to seek opinions of list members on making the list moderated. I certainly don't have time to moderate the list myself, so I would suggest giving at least a half dozen, maybe more, people the ability to approve posts to keep it flowing quickly. Moderators would be asked just to approve/disapprove based upon a
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] Broken build: r194813
Hi Cameron, I'm planning to address this issue today. HTH, Alex On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu> wrote: > Hey guys, > > My local build is broken after: > >>r194813 | glider | 2013-11-15 08:13:01 -0500 (Fri, 15 Nov 2013) | 2 lines >> >>[ASan] Add the configure+make rules for building the ASan runtime for iOS
2012 Nov 29
5
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
Jack, can you please upload this test somewhere? On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > +glider > The compiler hardly matters here, I would expect the same failures with > clang. > Alex, could you please take a look? > > --kcc > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> >
2014 Jun 25
3
[LLVMdev] Phabricator and private reviews
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:30 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: > On 6/25/14, 5:15 PM, Vadim Chugunov wrote: > > In a recent review via Phabricator, I was receiving bounce notifications for > mail being sent to llvm-commits because of "Too many recipients to the > message", even though I am a subscriber. I wonder how common is that. > > >
2012 Dec 04
0
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:46:09AM -0800, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > +kledzik at apple.com > The dynamic runtime is using dylib interposition (google for > "__DATA,__interpose). > If I'm understanding correctly (Nick, can you please confirm this?) > this allows to interpose the function regardless of the two-level > namespace. > The support for dynamic runtime in
2011 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add the disable_aslr option that will disable the address space layout randomization under AddressSanitizer on 10.6
+llvmdev Question to MacOS gurus: is there a way to disable ASLR (address space layout randomization) on Darwin at link time instead of doing setenv("DYLD_NO_PIE", "1", 1); and reexec? Thanks, --kcc On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com>wrote: > The attached patch introduces the disable_aslr option (off by default) > and the
2013 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code 2013
Dear All I'd like to announce that this year LLVM Compiler Infrastructure Project again participates in Google Summer of Code program. More details for prospective students will follow. PS: Yes, this means that we're starting to discuss student proposals (if any) -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2012 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
If this is the same test: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/cond1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1, then it doesn't fail for me on Mac OS 10.8 with ASan (Clang r168632) Have you tried symbolizing the report? On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com> wrote: > Jack, can you please upload this test somewhere?
2012 Nov 30
3
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
Looks like this happens on x86_64 because the position of __cxa_throw is too far from the allocated branch island (should be <2G). This can be solved by allocating the branch islands somewhere near the text segment (look for kIslandEnd in asan_mac.cc, this is currently 0x7fffffdf0000) or by patching the function with a longer instruction sequence that stores the jump target in a register and
2012 Nov 30
2
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:41:05PM +0400, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in > asanin favor of OSX's native function interposition. > So, we probably don't want to spend too much effort fixing mach_override. > > --kcc Kostya, Is the native function interposition that is being adopted based on...
2014 Sep 05
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Address sanitizer regression test failures for PPC64 targets
Note that I've set the SA_NODEFER flag for the SEGV handler in the ASan runtime only a couple of days ago. Not sure that could've affected this test though; without that flag the second SEGV would've simply crashed the program. But you can try removing the flag from compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix_libcdep.cc and see if that makes any difference. HTH, Alex On
2011 Dec 06
2
[LLVMdev] Assertion `PI && "Expected required passes to be initialized"' failed for AliasAnalysis.
Dear lazydev, I'm writing an instrumentation pass that depends on AliasAnalysis. My getAnalysisUsage() looks as follows: 2453 void ThreadSanitizer::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { 2454 AU.addRequired<TargetData>(); 2455 AU.addRequired<AliasAnalysis>(); 2456 } and the pass initialization: 2668 char ThreadSanitizer::ID = 0; 2669
2014 Jun 25
6
[LLVMdev] Phabricator and private reviews
In a recent review via Phabricator, I was receiving bounce notifications for mail being sent to llvm-commits because of "Too many recipients to the message", even though I am a subscriber. I wonder how common is that. On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > I am prioritizing email issues. Please always make sure to send them >
2012 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] radr://12777299, "potential pthread/eh bug exposed by libsanitizer"
Just want to remind everyone that we plan to stop using mach_override in asanin favor of OSX's native function interposition. So, we probably don't want to spend too much effort fixing mach_override. --kcc On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com>wrote: > Looks like this happens on x86_64 because the position of __cxa_throw > is too far from