similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0 - Windows - auto-importing issue with llvm::CallInst

On 12/2/2011 9:09 AM, Alan Garny wrote: > > However, there is one new (minor) issue which is that when building my > application I get a warning from the linker about auto-importing > having been activated without --enable-auto-import being specified on > the command line. Indeed, for some reason, the vtable for > llvm::CallInst has to be resolved...?! This is clearly not

Hi, >From what I have seen on this mailing list and elsewhere, it would seem that it isn't possible to build LLVM as a shared library using Visual C++. Still, I would imagine that quite a few people are or would be interested in it, so. is there any plan to support this any time soon? This, unless it's already supported in some way or another which I am not aware of.? I have been

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> writes: > > The problem is that MSVC++ requires sprinkling > > __declspec(dllexport/dllimport) all over the code, and we really don't > > want to deal with maintaining that, as most developers have little to > > no experience with Windows DLLs. > > BTW, you

> >> GNU make is essential to msys build. I guess msysdtk would have it. > > > > I could find a copy of msysDTK at > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/Other/Unsupported/MSYS/msy > > sDTK/, but not only is the 'latest' version a very old version > > (2003!), but once installed I couldn't find a copy of gmake in it. > >

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Alan Garny <agarny at hellix.com> wrote: > Hi, > > From what I have seen on this mailing list and elsewhere, it would seem that > it isn’t possible to build LLVM as a shared library using Visual C++. Still, > I would imagine that quite a few people are or would be interested in it, > so… is there any plan to support this any time soon? This,

Thanks a lot Reid. It’s much appreciated. I am going to apply your to my local copy of LLVM 3.6 and see how it goes. Cheers, Alan. From: Reid Kleckner [mailto:rnk at google.com] Sent: 01 April 2015 18:56 To: Alan Garny Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Workaround for Bug 22963? Thanks for the poke. I fixed the issue in r233819. It'll be in the next point

No, I am currently using MSVC 2013 Update 3. Why? Is there something I should (have) know(n)? Alan From: Zachary Turner [mailto:zturner at google.com] Sent: 10 March 2015 17:40 To: Alan Garny; llvmdev Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6: problems building on Windows using MSVC 2013 To be certain, are you using MSVC 2013 Update 4? On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:18 AM Alan Garny <agarny

Ok, I have just found the cause of the error messages I am getting, and it now makes sense to me why the 'normal' build works fine on Windows, Linux and OS X, and why my personal build works on Linux and OS X, but not on Windows. However, I still don't understand why I am getting the error messages I am getting. Anyway, it has to do with wanting to export some classes and function,

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Alan Garny <agarny at hellix.com> wrote: > Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > > Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> writes: > > > The problem is that MSVC++ requires sprinkling > > > __declspec(dllexport/dllimport) all over the code, and we really don't > > > want to deal with maintaining

> > So… my question is: why?! More importantly: what do I need to do to be > > able to export/import a class such as clang::driver::Compilation? > > It looks like MSVC is trying to synthesize and export the copy assignment > operator and copy constructur. This is interesting, as I thought it wouldn't do > that if the class turns out not to be non-copyable. > >

Hi, I have recently upgraded my project to LLVM 3.6 and I am wondering whether I should have waited for version 3.6.1. With JIT having been officially superseded by MCJIT, I updated my code and got everything working fine on 64-bit Windows, 32-bit/64-bit Linux and OS X, but it's not working properly on 32-bit Windows. Basically, the issue I am having is similar to the one reported in

Hi Takumi, > > Otherwise, > > I haven't installed binutils since I don't seem to need it.? > > You need binutils, esp. ld, nm, objdump. > > FYI, how to browse export table in DLL with objdump; $ objdump -x > XXX.dll Ok, I got the latest version of binutils from http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MinGW/Base/binutils/. > > As you can tell, I am

Sorry, I am using CMake+JOM or CMake+Ninja, if Ninja is available on the developer’s machine. Either way, it fails in both cases with a message similar to the one I included below (which was obtained using CMake+Ninja). Just in case, my (current) CMakeLists.txt file can be found at here

For what is worth, I have been able to trace my problem (thanks Kevin Kelley for the indirect help!). The 'culprit' was DLL Expert Viewer (http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/dll_export_viewer.html). It kept reporting that there were no exported functions, so I (wrongly) assumed that something had gone wrong while, using PEInfo (http://www.pazera-software.com/products/peinfo/) I could see that

Sorry, spoke too quickly! The problem was caused by my editing the MkRules file with an editor that replaces tabs with spaces. Make evidently requires that all lines start with a tab (see http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/v2faq/faq22_17.html). Perhaps worth warning windoze users like myself of such perils in readme.packages or somewhere similar! Now I have a new problem, but it looks fixable.

Hi, I have the following piece of code: %34 = fptosi float %33 to i32 %35 = call i32 @function(i32 %34) nounwind I would like of know how can I duplicate the statement %35 ? , as follows: %34 = fptosi float %33 to i32 %35 = call i32 @function(i32 %34) nounwind *%36 = **call i32 @function(i32 %34) nounwind* * * i.e, two instructions exactly equal. Using clone, results in badref. Moreover, how

Hi, My application generates some C code which I then compile using LLVM+Clang before running it. For the compilation side of things, I have a class which one of the methods (the CompilerEngine::compileCode() method in https://raw.github.com/opencor/opencor/llvm_3.3/src/plugins/misc/Compiler/sr c/compilerengine.cpp) is based on the code from the clang-interpreter example

What is the difference between a CallInst and an InvokeInst in LLVM? Is an InvokeInst a CallInst that can throw an exception? Thanks, Ryan

Hello All, I'm developing timing analysis tool using LLVM. After several analysis phases, I want to instantiate several instructions in the basic block. Instructions that I try to instantiate are like below; call void (int)* %waitABC(int 10) %tmp = call int (int, int*)* %doABC(int %i, int* %total) I think I should use 'CallInst' class in 'Instructions.h' file. How I could

I implement the following function,which gets CallInst * and should perform the following: 1. Change the value of the argument if condition1 takes place 2. Change the type of the argument if condition2 takes place 3. Add addition argument/s if condition3 takes place void argChange(CallInst * I) { for (unsigned index = 0; index < I->getNumOperands(); ++index) {