similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 - JIT problem on Windows

"Alan Garny" <alan.garny at dpag.ox.ac.uk> writes: > I have built a shared version of LLVM which I am now able to test in my > Qt-based application. It all works fine on Windows, Linux and Mac OS X, > except that whenever I exit my Qt-based application on Windows (everything > is fine on Linux and Mac OS X), I get a message that reads that "this > application

Sorry, I am using CMake+JOM or CMake+Ninja, if Ninja is available on the developer’s machine. Either way, it fails in both cases with a message similar to the one I included below (which was obtained using CMake+Ninja). Just in case, my (current) CMakeLists.txt file can be found at here

Hi, My application generates some C code which I then compile using LLVM+Clang before running it. For the compilation side of things, I have a class which one of the methods (the CompilerEngine::compileCode() method in https://raw.github.com/opencor/opencor/llvm_3.3/src/plugins/misc/Compiler/sr c/compilerengine.cpp) is based on the code from the clang-interpreter example

Hi, I can confirm this problem. We use clang's libtooling ToolInvocation object and the second module fails to compile even through it's a completely fresh instance. Adding -fno-vectorize explicitly seems to work around this problem, but does anyone know a real fix? ciao, Mario Am 20.06.13 15:07, schrieb Alan Garny: > My application generates some C code which I then compile using

Hi, I have been using LLVM+Clang in my project for some time and it has been working just fine up to now (I am currently using version 3.5.1). However, with version 3.6 having just been released, I thought I would give it a try and update my code to use MCJIT rather than the now discontinued JIT. Well, this proved to be a relatively smooth process, and everything is now working fine on

> > Now, I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that a call to > > InitializeNativeTarget was recommended, if not compulsory, so. why > > commenting it out not only makes my LLVM code still work, but also > > prevent my application from generating the above error.?! > > My bet is that your code is writing through a stray pointer. By removing the > call to

> > > Now, I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that a call to > > > InitializeNativeTarget was recommended, if not compulsory, so. why > > > commenting it out not only makes my LLVM code still work, but also > > > prevent my application from generating the above error.?! > > > > My bet is that your code is writing through a stray pointer.

Hi, I have successfully built a shared version of LLVM (both 3.0rc4 and 2.9) on Windows 7 using MinGW. From there, I thought I would run the tests located under unittests (i.e. ADTTests, AnalysisTests, ExecutionEnginetests, JITTests, SupportTests, UtilsTests and VMCoreTests). All of them pass without any problem, except for JITTests which fails on the MultiJitTest.JitPool test:

Hi, I have just upgraded to LLVM 3.0 (nice job btw!) which I have built as a shared library on Windows using MinGW, and then use from within my Qt-based application. Upon execution, everything works perfectly (incl. the call to llvm::InitializeNativeTarget(); which used to cause problems upon exiting my application; see http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-November/045597.html; in

Thanks a lot Reid. It’s much appreciated. I am going to apply your to my local copy of LLVM 3.6 and see how it goes. Cheers, Alan. From: Reid Kleckner [mailto:rnk at google.com] Sent: 01 April 2015 18:56 To: Alan Garny Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Workaround for Bug 22963? Thanks for the poke. I fixed the issue in r233819. It'll be in the next point

No, I am currently using MSVC 2013 Update 3. Why? Is there something I should (have) know(n)? Alan From: Zachary Turner [mailto:zturner at google.com] Sent: 10 March 2015 17:40 To: Alan Garny; llvmdev Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6: problems building on Windows using MSVC 2013 To be certain, are you using MSVC 2013 Update 4? On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:18 AM Alan Garny <agarny

For those who come to this thread and want to do know how I, personally, build LLVM, I have written some short instructions (for my Qt-based project) so that people can rebuild LLVM easily on Windows, Linux and Mac OS X, if ever needed: https://raw.github.com/opencor/opencor/master/src/plugins/3rdparty/LLVM/READ ME.txt. Alan

> > So… my question is: why?! More importantly: what do I need to do to be > > able to export/import a class such as clang::driver::Compilation? > > It looks like MSVC is trying to synthesize and export the copy assignment > operator and copy constructur. This is interesting, as I thought it wouldn't do > that if the class turns out not to be non-copyable. > >

Hi, I have recently upgraded my project to LLVM 3.6 and I am wondering whether I should have waited for version 3.6.1. With JIT having been officially superseded by MCJIT, I updated my code and got everything working fine on 64-bit Windows, 32-bit/64-bit Linux and OS X, but it's not working properly on 32-bit Windows. Basically, the issue I am having is similar to the one reported in

On Jun 17, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Paul Melis wrote: > FWIW, I'm also suddenly experiencing segfaults in code that used to > work > a few days ago (I'm using svn). This may be unrelated to the problem > described below, but perhaps it's the same thing. > > In my case it seems that creating an ExecutionEngine has changed. I > used > to do > > Module* Mod

Hi, >From what I have seen on this mailing list and elsewhere, it would seem that it isn't possible to build LLVM as a shared library using Visual C++. Still, I would imagine that quite a few people are or would be interested in it, so. is there any plan to support this any time soon? This, unless it's already supported in some way or another which I am not aware of.? I have been

Hello All, I'm building an F# binding for LLVM and it seems to be working for the parts of Core and BitWriter that I've tested but I've hit problems with Target/ExecutionEngine. The following test code works with the initializeNativeTarget line commented out like so: <https://github.com/keithshep/llvm-fs/blob/b7050b841108dc703e58563a4cff8845603c950d/test/simpletest2.fs> ...

Hi Alan, On 12/01/12 20:19, Alan Garny wrote: >>> Yes, it was the entire LLVM assembly code that I generated. However, I >>> have now prepended targetdata to the code I generate (using >>> executionEngine->getTargetData()->getStringRepresentation()), but to >>> executionEngine->no >>> avail. I still get the exact same result...?! >>

On 12/2/2011 9:09 AM, Alan Garny wrote: > > However, there is one new (minor) issue which is that when building my > application I get a warning from the linker about auto-importing > having been activated without --enable-auto-import being specified on > the command line. Indeed, for some reason, the vtable for > llvm::CallInst has to be resolved...?! This is clearly not

Hi, Why are there so many undocumented (and as I far I can see) unnecessary API changes? Recently there has been: 1. For JIT applications, please include llvm/Target/TargetSelect.h and call the llvm::InitializeNativeTarget() function before creating an EE. 2. The major CHANGE is: the JIT will no longer be safe for executing threaded applications without first invoking