similar to: [LLVMdev] Planned LLVM buildmaster restart

Hey all, It seems that the main buildmaster here is working fine http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ However, I have a 'connection refused' error whilst connecting to the staging buildmaster http://lab.llvm.org:8014/ Are you aware of this Victor and Galina? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster will be offline on 1/13/17 hopefully for short time due for replacing network hardware. Thank you for understanding. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170112/cafe6991/attachment.html>

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster will be restarted today after 6 PM Pacific time today. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141126/2d94025c/attachment.html>

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster is up and running as lab.llvm.org:8011. Daniel Berlin is working on getting the current buildslave passwords from the old buildmaster, but this may not be possible. I'd suggest changing buildslave passwords anyway, just in case. Buildslave owners, please contact me directly with your new passwords and I'll update the master as soon as I can. Thanks

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster will be off-line for about 30 minutes today after 5 pm PST for maintenance. Thank you for understanding. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190620/333eb4de/attachment.html>

I’ve had another look, and some of the failing tests don’t use temporary files, so I don’t think this is a case of tests having side-effects. Instead, I’ve noticed that in the build log (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/6552/steps/build-unified-tree/logs/stdio), llvm-tblgen.exe is built (my patch modified it), but the table-generation steps of the

The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. Thanks Galina -----Original Message----- From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:42 AM To: Galina Kistanova Cc: Duncan Sands; llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com; Galina Kistanova; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed On Tue,

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted after 5PM Pacific time today. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200120/567b3b5a/attachment.html>

Hello everyone, It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different... I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. > Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. > Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the

This issue is back: FNT bots are reporting success in spite of tests failing, and the "report" text is empty again. Did someone change something? Ciao, Duncan. On 12/12/12 07:53, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote: >> The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. > > The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report"

On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote: > The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report" is no longer empty. Does anyone know what fixed them? Ciao, Duncan. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday,

Hello everyone, LLVM buildmaster is back to work. Two slaves remain off for now as they produce a lot of warnings and their log files are way too big. The next builds have full logs available. Hope this helps to fix this issue: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/builds/8716 http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-windows/builds/2645 Thanks Galina

Hello everyone, I have migrated the buildmaster to the PostgreSQL. All the data has been preserved and all builds are valid (none of the builds has been affected by the migration and restart). I have tested and watched it over the weekend, and it seems everything works fine. The response time of the WebUI is fine. Please let me know if you will see or notice anything odd. Thanks Galina On

Hello, LLVM buildbot master will be stopped tonight for short time due to maintenance jobs. Thanks for understanding. Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130121/e38ef221/attachment.html>

Hello, I am going to take LLVM build master down for maintenance tonight. Sorry for inconvenience. If this time is not OK for anyone speak please! Thanks Galina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130111/b02e9e8e/attachment.html>

Hi Danny, Could you send me the local.cfg from the original buildmaster with the buildslave names and passwords, please? Thanks Galina On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Berlin <dannyb at google.com> wrote: > Sure, i'm fine with it :) > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: >> Danny, >> >> lab.llvm.org

Hello everyone, We have a number of issues with the current buildbot infrastructure. During this week I will be addressing 2 which I think are most important. 1. There is no well specified dependencies, so all builders get triggered by any change in any of watched projects. I.e. lldb change triggers clang build and versa versa. 2. If a project depends on multiple others, sequential changes could

I'd like to take code ownership of the LLVM Buildbot code. Thanks Galina

Thank you. Alexei just committed the change to SVN. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM. > Please commit. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:32 PM,