Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] release notes: please mention Intrinsic::memory_barrier removal in 3.0"
2011 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] release notes: please mention Intrinsic::memory_barrier removal in 3.0
Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch?
-bw
On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> 2011/10/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced with fence intrinsics.
>> Could someone who understands this change better than me please update the 3.0 release notes?
>>
2011 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] release notes: please mention Intrinsic::memory_barrier removal in 3.0
2011/10/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced with fence intrinsics.
> Could someone who understands this change better than me please update the 3.0 release notes?
> Also the LangRef still mentions llvm.memory.barrier but this is gone from 3.0.
r142994 and r142998 for the relevant changes.
2011 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] release notes: please mention Intrinsic::memory_barrier removal in 3.0
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch?
r142994 is necessary; I thought I already sent you an email about
that. r142998 only touches the release notes; it looks like you're
hacking on those on trunk.
-Eli
> On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>
>> 2011/10/25 Török Edwin
2009 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] [LLVM][g++] A helping hand
--- On Fri, 1/30/09, Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [LLVM][g++] A helping hand
> To: kasra_n500 at yahoo.com, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc..edu>
> Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 8:29 AM
> On 2009-01-30 18:19, Kasra wrote:
> > Hi All,
>
2010 May 18
4
[LLVMdev] DEBUG INFO at the bytecode level
Thanks Edwin.
I found DebugInfo.cpp may be useful. Could you tell me which function
I should call inorder to know the source file name and the line number
for a particular instruction?
Cheers,
Zheng
2010/5/18 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>:
> On 05/18/2010 01:26 PM, Zheng Wang wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Could I get some debug info at the byte code level? I am
2008 Jan 10
4
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
Török Edwin wrote:
> Yes, I have uploaded the .tar.gz here:
> http://edwintorok.googlepages.com/ClamAV-srcflat.tar.gz
> [inputs dir contains some symlink, place ClamAV dir in
> llvm/projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications to make
> links point to right place]
>
>
Hi,
Because llvm bug #1730 got fixed, this testcase can run under with the
JIT on x86-64 :).
I have
2010 Nov 03
4
[LLVMdev] Fw: Forcing the Interpreter segfaults
[I assume you meant to send this to the list as well, not just me.]
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:43:54 +0000
From: Salomon Brys <salomon.brys at gmail.com>
To: Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Forcing the Interpreter segfaults
I have build LLVM in debug mode. Here are the informations of the
segfault : memcpy() at 0x7ffff6f6581e
2008 Mar 26
2
[LLVMdev] Adding SQLite3 to llvm test-suite
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
> > The new package is here:
> > http://edwintorok.googlepages.com/sqlite_lemon_llvmtest.tar.gz
> > Anything else I should change?
>
> Looks good. Please commit.
Should I speak with Chris about commit access?
I made the change
2008 Jan 10
0
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
Hi,
We are getting closer.
1. In Makefile, all the references to CFLAGS should be CPPFLAGS instead.
2. filterdiff.sh uses sed -re. This causes a problem on Mac OS X where
-E means using extended regular expression, not -r.
sed: illegal option -- r
usage: sed script [-Ealn] [-i extension] [file ...]
sed [-Ealn] [-i extension] [-e script] ... [-f
script_file] ... [file ...]
Can this
2008 Mar 25
2
[LLVMdev] Adding SQLite3 to llvm test-suite
Evan Cheng wrote:
> Hi Edwin,
>
Hi Evan,
> It works fine for me. Thanks!
>
> We prefer a flat directory structure. Is it possible for you to
> separate it out to sqlite3 and lemon rather than having them as sub-
> directories under SQLite?
Ok.
The new package is here:
http://edwintorok.googlepages.com/sqlite_lemon_llvmtest.tar.gz
Anything else I should change?
>
2009 Jul 15
8
[LLVMdev] please stabilize the trunk
On 2009-07-15 23:24, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:52 AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote:
>
>
>> We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang)
>> recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly.
>>
>> I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization
>> day." Please avoid
2011 Feb 14
5
[LLVMdev] Introducing LLBrowse: A graphical browser for LLVM modules
OK I figured out what the problem was - I assume you are trying to compile
under Snow Leopard? There is a problem with linking against wxWidgets
because the prebuilt binaries for wxWidgets are compiled in 32-bit mode, and
the default compilation mode in Snow Leopard is 64 bits. See this article
for an explanation:
http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/Development:_wxMac#Building_under_10.6_Snow_Leopard
2011 Feb 14
0
[LLVMdev] Introducing LLBrowse: A graphical browser for LLVM modules
On 2011-02-14 20:58, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2011-02-14 20:39, Talin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org
>> <mailto:rengolin at systemcall.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I think this deserves a blog post...
>>
>> I'd like to wait until I get some feedback - I don't know yet if
2011 Feb 14
3
[LLVMdev] Introducing LLBrowse: A graphical browser for LLVM modules
On 2011-02-14 20:39, Talin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org
> <mailto:rengolin at systemcall.org>> wrote:
>
> I think this deserves a blog post...
>
> I'd like to wait until I get some feedback - I don't know yet if anyone
> is having trouble building or running the thing...
Hi Talin,
2009 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] unwind/invoke design
2009/6/15 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>:
> Write some C++ code into llvm.org/demo, and watch the output assembly,
That shows how to use the c++ runtime for handling c++ style
exceptions. More useful might be an llvm implementation of
__cxa_throw, which I could then modify. ;)
2009 Jan 30
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVM][g++] A helping hand
Hi All,
I was looking into using LLVM with C++. Currently there is almost no C++ support (C support only).
Just wondering who is the person to contact so I could help out with C++ extension for LLVM.
With Best Regards
KaZ
Department of Mathematics and Computing
Imperial College London
2010 Dec 09
4
[LLVMdev] Parallel testsuite run breaks
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:24:19 -0600
greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) wrote:
> greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes:
>
> > Often I run a few different builds in parallel, with different
> > obj/build directories. Is it possible that the test infrastructure
> > writes something to the source directories or some common temp
> > directory? That
2009 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVM][g++] A helping hand
On 2009-01-30 18:19, Kasra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was looking into using LLVM with C++. Currently there is almost no C++ support (C support only).
>
LLVM is written in C++, has a C++ API, and llvm-gcc frontend can
compile C++ programs.
What exactly is the C++ support you are missing?
Best regards,
--Edwin
2010 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] Visual Studio 2010 status on trunk?
Hi,
What is the status of building LLVM trunk with Visual Studio 2010
(32/64-bit)?
Were the build problems of LLVM 2.7 fixed?
Best regards,
--Edwin
2008 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
I've filed
http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1912
for the optimizer bug.
Evan
On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are getting closer.
>
> 1. In Makefile, all the references to CFLAGS should be CPPFLAGS
> instead.
> 2. filterdiff.sh uses sed -re. This causes a problem on Mac OS X where
> -E means using extended regular expression, not