similar to: [LLVMdev] Native linker

Hi Hans, There was a presentation at last year's DevMeeting.  See http://www.llvm.org/devmtg/2010-11/ and look for the presentation on Object Files by Michael Spencer.  As for the news, we haven't heard much here either. --Sam >________________________________ >From: Hans Stimer <hans.stimer at gmail.com> >To: LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu >Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011

It's not so easy to create a linker that has all the bells and whistles, especially on windows. You have to look at the totality of options, linker files, shared objects, etc. It's not a weekend project. If you want to read the elf manual and gnu ld and then write a new one you could do that. Clang can easily be fixed to incorporate it either as a default or as an optional linker. The

It looks like it is kind of stalled: ~/extern/llvm.head/lib/Object $ svn log On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Hans Stimer <hans.stimer at gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like someone got started on this project: > > http://www.llvm.org/devmtg/2010-11/Spencer-ObjectFiles.pdf > > Does anyone know what kind of progress has been made? > > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:10

Are there examples on doing the following? 1) Creating stand alone executables 2) Making system calls 3) Creating debug info Obviously clang does all this, but I was hoping for something less complex. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110512/ba62fcfc/attachment.html>

It looks like someone got started on this project: http://www.llvm.org/devmtg/2010-11/Spencer-ObjectFiles.pdf Does anyone know what kind of progress has been made? On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > It's not so easy to create a linker that has all the bells and whistles, > especially on windows. > You have to look at the totality of

It appears that when you link bitcode files into a native executable using llvm-ld, that gcc is used for the final step. I would like to create a tool that creates native executables without requiring gcc/clang. Is that currently supported with llvm? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Hans Stimer <hans.stimer at gmail.com> wrote: > It appears that when you link bitcode files into a native executable using > llvm-ld, that gcc is used for the final step. > > I would like to create a tool that creates native executables without > requiring gcc/clang. Is that currently supported with llvm? > To create executables, LLVM

In a discussion on IRC, Micheal was complaining about the semantics of StringSet, specifically how the iterators work. DannyB mentioned that we have a Trie class, so I decided to check it out. Lo and behold, I couldn't find _any_ uses of it, and when I deleted it from my system and did a clean rebuild, everything was fine. Looking at the log, the last substantial change to this class was in

I found a bug in the expansion code for SUB going back to at least LLVM 2.6 and still shows up in trunk. case ISD::SUB: { EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0); assert(TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::ADD, VT) && TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::XOR, VT) && "Don't know how to expand this subtraction!"); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::XOR, dl,

Hello! We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. I've noticed that llvm-nm (as well as other tools) doesn't demangle C++ names. Is it true, that LLVM doesn't have the code that is capable of that, and if yes, are there any plans to add it? Depending on something like libiberty.a doesn't seem like a

Hey everyone, first of all I just wanted to say thanks :) I've been using libclang for building my own C/C++ IDE and its great. I have, however discovered a bug (which I already submitted on llvm bugzilla but I got the impression that no one reads that :)). If I try to use clang_parseTranslationUnit on this code below: int main() { return reinterpret_cast libclang crashes. This is the code

The file begins: > #ifndef LLVM_SUPPORT_WIN_COFF_H > #define LLVM_SUPPORT_WIN_COFF_H Why "WIN_COFF_H" - since this code is not windows-specific, as far as I can tell. -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists at gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). --

On Nov 6, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > Binutils and LLVM > > As part of "owning our own toolchain", various people have expressed an interest and have been working on creating various tools that duplicate the functionality of tools available on other systems. I have summarized the information that I've gathered, and put it up

On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Hello! > > We want to implement in-process symbolizer for {Address,Thread}Sanitizer testing tools that would be based on LLVM libraries. > I've noticed that llvm-nm (as well as other tools) doesn't demangle C++ names. Is it true, that LLVM doesn't have the code that is capable > of that, and if yes, are there any

Delete it. =] Thanks. On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > In a discussion on IRC, Micheal was complaining about the semantics of > StringSet, specifically how the iterators work. > > DannyB mentioned that we have a Trie class, so I decided to check it out. > Lo and behold, I couldn't find _any_ uses of it, and when I deleted

So, I'm trying to use this file to look inside COFF files. Got the header. OK. Now I want to look at the sections. Look, there's a section iterator. I can use that! So, I write: for (llvm::object::section_iterator iter = Obj.begin_sections (); iter != Obj.end_sections(); ++iter ) and it doesn't compile. There's no ++ for section iterators. Apparently, you're supposed to

We are happy to announce that the list of accepted sessions is available online [0]. The hacker's lab will be organized similar to the one at the US 2016 meeting [1]. To this end, we rely on you to send us topics via mail: eurollvm17-orga at cs.uni-saarland.de We will then look for knowledgeable volunteers and have a selection process to determine which are most interesting for the

On Jun 13, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote: > 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like > > to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just > > bare

That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or should I just grab them using wget? 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd > like > > to begin gradually extending

On May 21, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I found a bug in the expansion code for SUB going back to at least LLVM 2.6 and still shows up in trunk. > case ISD::SUB: { > EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0); > assert(TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::ADD, VT) && > TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::XOR, VT) && > "Don't