similar to: [LLVMdev] How to place call(s) to functions found in other llvm modules ???

Hi, I tried this as well, using the following line to add function declaration to the caller module. Function::Create(FT, Function::ExternalLinkage, "gcd", mod); Where "FT" is the same as before. And the output produced by the PrintModulePass becomes: ; ModuleID = 'GCDMain' declare i32 @gcd(i32, i32) define i32 @main() { EntryBlock: %tmp = call i32 @gcd(i32

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Mian M. Hamayun <mian-muhammad.hamayun at imag.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried this as well, using the following line to add function declaration > to the caller module. > > Function::Create(FT, Function::ExternalLinkage, "gcd", mod); > > Where "FT" is the same as before. And the output produced by the >

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Mian M. Hamayun <mian-muhammad.hamayun at imag.fr> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am trying to create two modules in LLVM, where first module contains the > definition of a function, gcd in this example and another module contains a > call to this function. You can't reference a global in one module in another module. Either stick with

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2207 Bug ID: 2207 Summary: Potential NULL deference, found using coverity Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee:

I've just begun playing around with defining functions in R and I'm not really sure what's going on in the following situation. I've defined the following function: gcd <- function(x,y) { x <- as.integer(x); y <- as.integer(y) q <- as.integer(x / y) r <- x - q * y if (r==0) y else gcd(y,r) } As expected, it gives the following results: > gcd(3,2) [1] 1

Hi, I have this piece of code: tm = local ? localtime(&curr) : gmtime(&curr); if (!tm) return NULL; which translates into something like: ---------------------------------------------- entry: %iftmp.0 = alloca %struct.tm*, align 8 %tm = alloca %struct.tm*, align 8 ... // Declares iftmp.0 as iftmp.0 call void @llvm.dbg.declare( { }* %iftmp.0, { }* bitcast

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Many thanks for working on this! > SSI/e-SSA is the only way I'm aware of for doing efficient sparse > analyses, so I'm definitely in favor of adding support for it in LLVM! > > I read the discussion so far and did a cursory review of the patches, and > I have just a

Dear, I am looking at the Instructions defined in the XXXXInstrInfo.td where I can see a def record defined like below def ADD8rr : I8rr<0x0, (outs GR8:$dst), (ins GR8:$src, GR8:$src2), "add.b\t{$src2, $dst}", [(set GR8:$dst, (*add *GR8:$src, GR8:$src2)), (implicit SRW)]>; Now here I would like the to

Hi, You asked for bug reports on failed build/platforms combinations, here is one: —————— . . . llvm[3]: Compiling TestMain.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[3]: Building Debug+Asserts Archive Library libUnitTestMain.a gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/jocke/gcd/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain' gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jocke/gcd/llvm/utils/unittest' gmake[1]: Leaving directory

hi ?integer says: Note that on almost all implementations of R the range of representable integers is restricted to about +/-2*10^9: 'double's can hold much larger integers exactly. I am getting very confused as to when to use integers and when not to. In my line I need exact comparisons of large integer-valued arrays, so I often use as.integer(), but the above

Hi all, When compiling some programs using the Mips backend i'm getting this assert message on lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp:227: "Range is not entirely in interval!" I don't know yet if it's something that is missing on the backend code or why the range to be removed it outside the interval, does anyone have any clue? A more detailed output is attached. The program i tried

On Aug 29, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Matthieu Delahaye wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 09:24 -0700, Devang Patel wrote: > [...] >> - Put various tests, DeltaTest, in lib/Analysis folder. The >> transformation pass does not need to see these details. > > > I believe some low-level tests should actually not be implemented as a > separate Analysis but placed into

I'm wrapping a function in R and I want to record all the arguments passed to it, including default values and missing values. I want to be able to snoop on function calls in sourced scripts as part of a unit testing framework. I can capture the values fine, but I'm having trouble evaluating them as if `force()` had been applied to each of them. Here is a minimal example: f0 <-

> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 abhi232 at cc.gatech.edu wrote: >> Hello all, >> I am new to the llvm infrastructure so if this question is already >> resolved please redirect me to that link. >> >> I am writing a pass for flow sensitive and context sensitive alias >> analysis.for that i require the previous and next instruction of all the >> instructions.Is there

Neal, FYI, my group has added a flag to llvm-gcc for emitting the va_arg instruction (instead of lowering in the front-end), and we also have an implementation of the VAARG instruction for X86-64. (which is currently not implemented in the LLVM backend). Both of these things will be sent upstream to LLVM soon, pending some more testing and review. If you are dire need of these features now, I

From: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk> it has just verified that it asks no more than the length of the first segment of iovec. And with that the last user of stuff in lib/iovec.c is gone. RIP. Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org

From: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk> it has just verified that it asks no more than the length of the first segment of iovec. And with that the last user of stuff in lib/iovec.c is gone. RIP. Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org

Dear, I am trying to visualise a time-progressing line (it's supposed to represent spread patterns) using brew package and Google Earth. The idea is to have a function which takes start and end point geographic coordinates, as well as number of intervals to chop the path up, and returns the collection of points segmenting this line. Unfortunately my calculations fail for large distances,

Hi, These patches improve the resampler set_rate function. The first 2 patches do some cleanups in the GCD calculation and avoid an overflow when calculating the new phase. This patch could probably be simplified if we allowed 64bits operations in speexdsp. The 3rd patch avoid rounding errors in the phase calculation. The problem is that the new rate is calculated with the reduced rate, which

I noticed i had mail_location wrong, i was specifying INDEX=/dovecot-index instead of INDEX=~/dovecot-index so i modifed and restarted dovecot, one of my techs that happens to have thousands of emails reopened her mail and this showed up in the log. Not sure if this is critical or if more info/dovecot -n is needed dovecot: 2009-05-05 14:06:38 Panic: imap <REMOVED>: file mail-search.c: line