similar to: [LLVMdev] Performance benchmarks available?

> They actually answered. They said that they stopped publishing benchmark > results. And if they did, they wouldn't mean anything to you. Do your own benchmarking, on the stuff that matters to you. It's the only fair benchmark you'll ever see.

On 08/04/2011 11:35, FlyLanguage wrote: > Do your own benchmarking, on the stuff that matters to you. It's the > only fair benchmark you'll ever see. I agree, but this is somewhat extreme point of view. Some general comparisons could also be of interest. For example, performance comparison of some deterministic software like GLPK solver, or compiler itself would be interesting to

Recently, a package for convex optimization was announced for Python, based upon the LP solver GLPK, the SDP solver in DSDP5, and the LP and QP solvers in MOSEK. I'm aware GLPK is available for R, but wondered if anyone had good packages for convex optimization along these lines for R. TIA.

I have a piece of code (from Xie et al. 2009 Autophagy 5:217) that runs in R and requires the glpk package. A year or so ago, I was able to download and install the glpk package directly from insider the R program (for Windows), and everything worked fine. Now I have installed R for Windows on a new computer, and I cannot find the glpk package on the list of available packages on my local

Hi. I am aware of three different R packages for linear programming: glpk, linprog, lpSolve. From what I can tell, if there are N variables and M constraints, all these solvers require the full NxM constraint matrix. Some linear solvers I know of (not in R) have a sparse matrix input format. Are there any linear solvers in R that have a sparse matrix input format? (including the

Dear listers, a central problem in conservation biology is the selection of sites in reserve network design. many algorithms have been published, and I was wondering any have been implemented in R. I did not seen anything on CRAN or R-help, or on the web in general. Best regards, Eric Eric Pante ---------------------------------------------------------------- College of Charleston, Grice

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:56 AM, FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> wrote: > #define ASSERT_STRM(cond, args) \ >> if (!(cond)) AssertionFailureStream(__FILE_**_, __LINE__) << args >> >> Note that there's no trailing semicolon, as this is supplied at the >> point where the macro is invoked. >> >> What do you think? >> >

> On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:15 PM, FlyLanguage wrote: > >>> Is that really true? I've heard of a lot of LLVM developers using git >>> but it all seems very opaque right now. That's why I hope to get people >>> talking so we can find out where everyone is and go from there. >> >> Yet, there's surprisingly little complaint about Subversion around

Forgot to CC the list, sorry. ----- Forwarded Message ----- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> > Cc: > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:40 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RTTI gone in 3.0? > > Hi FlyLanguage, > > I thought LLVM disabled RTTI a long time ago.  It was just too slow. > > --Sam >

Den 26.07.2011 20:12, skrev Talin: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:56 AM, FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com > <mailto:flylanguage at gmail.com>> wrote: > > #define ASSERT_STRM(cond, args) \ > if (!(cond)) AssertionFailureStream(__FILE____, __LINE__) > << args > > Note that there's no trailing semicolon, as this

On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:15 PM, FlyLanguage wrote: >> Is that really true? I've heard of a lot of LLVM developers using git >> but it all seems very opaque right now. That's why I hope to get people >> talking so we can find out where everyone is and go from there. > > Yet, there's surprisingly little complaint about Subversion around here, > which is kinda

> Or, the front-end of my programming language has to analize the source > code, and convert it to LLVM-IR? Yes

Hi: I really liked the music on your 32kbps stream. That is what I listened to. It is very high quality low bandwidth. You must have a recording studio as well as the station. The website for the Linux Public Broadcasting Network is www.lpbn.org I'll create a mailing list for radio on LPBN later tonight so our emails don't disrupte the kind folks at icecast. Just a note, on Sunday I

In my post at https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2011-October/292019.html I included an undefined term "ej". The problem code should be as follows. It seems like a simple linear programming problem, but for some reason my code is not finding the solution. obj <- c(rep(0,3),1) col1 <-c(1,0,0,1,0,0,1,-2.330078923,0) col2 <-c(0,1,0,0,1,0,1,-2.057855981,0) col3

Can optimisation (simplex etc) be done through R?

Does anyone know whether R has its own modeling language for optimization problems (like SIMPLE in NuOPT for S-plus)? Paolo

> I'd also recommand "git pull --rebase" if the goal is to keep history > linear. Note that this has to go with a big, fat, warning, telling the > user that rebasing published history is bad. Rebase is a very good tool > to work with private history, but as soon as you've pushed it to some > place visible by other people, you should stop using it. This is

Hey folks, ** Description ** Firstly for those who don''t know, Ferret is a full-text search library which makes adding search to your application a breeze. It''s much faster than MySQL full-text search as well most other search libraries out there. It allows you to do Boolean (+ruby + rails -jewelry) and phrase queries ("the quick brown fox") as well as some more

> On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:57 AM, David Greene wrote: >> >> Did the project ever come to a decision about making a transition to >> git? I'm trying to do some longer-term planning and it would be helpful >> to know what the roadmap is. It's stuck on: 1) A misunderstanding that global revision numbers are necessary and that 'git describe' along with

Lot of good points. > Yep, switching to git would require a lot of work on the project > maintainers' side. Commit hooks, setting up repositories, rewording > policies in terms of the commands of the new tools, and that only to > regain the status the project already has - [...] All of which could be done on a mirror, with pushes to svn during the transition. Once it can be