similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM / CLANG Test Infrastructure Question

On Jul 27, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Sundeep wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on a bug in clang. I already have a fix for it and I am going > through the "LLVM Testing Infrastructure Guide" to make sure I haven't > broken anything else. I have few questions regarding the test suite > infrastructure that I hope someone can answer. > > 1. I checked out and built

> > 1. I checked out and built llvm, clang, and test-suite from svn tip. > When I > > run llvm/test *without* my changes on x86, I see 3 failures. Is it > expected? > > I was expecting svn tip on x86 to be clean. Is there a nightly > regression > > result available somewhere that I can check for broken tests. Here is > the > > report from my log: > >

On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Sundeep wrote: >>> 1. I checked out and built llvm, clang, and test-suite from svn tip. >> When I >>> run llvm/test *without* my changes on x86, I see 3 failures. Is it >> expected? >>> I was expecting svn tip on x86 to be clean. Is there a nightly >> regression >>> result available somewhere that I can check for

Hi Sundeep, I am also interested in the load-store lifting transformation. For static globals as-in your example, the transformation in general would rely on a better static global aliasing information that is currently in review http://reviews.llvm.org/D10059 For non-static globals, one problem with loop-based analysis alone is that in a popular embedded benchmark suite, you get serious gains

Hello all, I am writing to get some feedback on an optimization that I would like to upstream. The basic idea is to localize global variables inside loops so that it can be allocated into registers. For example, transform the following sequence static int gbl_var; void foo() { for () { ...access gbl_var... } } into something like static int gbl_var; void foo() { int lcl_var;

I downloaded via svn the release_30 and current version code. I am on x86_64 GNU/Linux, I am compiling with gcc 4.4.6 I compiled release_30 with make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 OPTIMIZE_OPTION=-O0 and current release with make In both cases, when I make check-all I get : FAIL: Clang :: Preprocessor/macro_paste_c_block_comment.c (2562 of 9598) ******************** TEST 'Clang ::

As part of our automated testing, I'm running make check-all to watch for failures. One of my builds uses the --enable-optimized option to configure. When I build the latest trunk, I'm now seeing 18 failing tests: Clang :: Preprocessor/macro_paste_c_block_comment.c LLVM :: CodeGen/ARM/2011-05-04-MultipleLandingPadSuccs.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/ARM/2011-11-14-EarlyClobber.ll LLVM

On 12/12/11 19:29, Evan Cheng wrote: > On Dec 12, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Brendan Kirby wrote: > >> As part of our automated testing, I'm running make check-all to watch >> for failures. One of my builds uses the --enable-optimized option to >> configure. When I build the latest trunk, I'm now seeing 18 failing >> tests: >> Clang ::

Hi all, I am analyzing auto inc/dec optimization on ARM. On some loops, I noticed aggressive post increment is resulting in poor code due to increased register pressure. I was wondering if there is a way to estimate register pressure during DAG Combiner. I am trying to come up with some heuristic based on # of DAG nodes, # of live ins and live outs, # of machine registers etc. Any suggestions?

On Jun 27, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 2015, at 11:07 PM, Sundeep Mediratta <smedius at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 0.000233 upsdrv_initups(): Power Sources blob: >> <CFArray 0x7ffd18605480 [0x7fff7443bed0]>{type = immutable, count = 1, values = ( >> 0 : <CFBasicHash 0x7ffd18605360 [0x7fff7443bed0]>{type

I have now made a report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11552. Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Patrik Hägglund H Sent: den 13 december 2011 08:07 To: Brendan Kirby; Evan Cheng Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] make check-all failing 18 tests with --enable-optimized I

> On Jun 26, 2015, at 9:25 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Sundeep Mediratta <smedius at gmail.com> wrote: > >> OSX Yosemite 10.10.3 >> Nut version 2.6.5 >> Installed via Macports >> Device is Cyberpower CP1000AVRLCD >> Device is visible and is monitored in the OSX control panel >>

I don't know about the LLVM errors, but I have seen the Clang error before. It occurs because the test is not path independent. In Preprocessor/macro_paste_c_block_comment.c you have 'nog grep scratch', which means that you can't have 'scratch' in your path. I think this should be reported as a bug. Regards, Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces

On 12/13/11 01:09, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Brendan Kirby <bkirby at mips.com> wrote: >> As part of our automated testing, I'm running make check-all to watch >> for failures. One of my builds uses the --enable-optimized option to >> configure. When I build the latest trunk, I'm now seeing 18 failing >> tests: >>

Thanks for this, I noticed this recently also (and internally expect it to fail). -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Patrik Hägglund H Sent: 13 December 2011 08:31 To: Brendan Kirby; Evan Cheng Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] make check-all failing 18 tests with --enable-optimized I have now made

On 24/08/15 10:49, Sundeep Singh Nanuwa wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any issues using spaces in directories paths? > > On 21/08/15 11:06, Sunny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have the following shares listed in smb.conf >> >> users cannot access the samba share directly i.e. >> >> \\sambaserver\rixilr >> or >> \\sambaserver\bridges >>

OSX Yosemite 10.10.3 Nut version 2.6.5 Installed via Macports Device is Cyberpower CP1000AVRLCD Device is visible and is monitored in the OSX control panel Error- macosx-ups -DD -a cyberpower Network UPS Tools - Mac OS X UPS meta-driver 1.0 (2.6.5-Unversioned directory) Warning: This is an experimental driver. Some features may not function correctly. 0.000000 debug level is '2'

Hi All, I noticed LLVM target independent side is converting an ordered less than "setolt" into unordered greater than "setuge" operation. There are no target hooks to control going from the ordered mode into unordered. I am trying to figure out the best way to support unordered operation on Hexagon. We don't have a single instruction to do unordered operation. So we

Hi Simona, these failures are due to the name of the path to LLVM/clang, see below. > /scratch/user/download/release_30/build/Debug/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem > /scratch/user/download/release_30/build/Debug/bin/../lib/clang/3.0/include > /scratch/user/download/release_30/llvm/tools/clang/test/Preprocessor/macro_paste_c_block_comment.c > > > -Eonly 2>&1 | not grep

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Brendan Kirby <bkirby at mips.com> wrote: > As part of our automated testing, I'm running make check-all to watch > for failures.  One of my builds uses the --enable-optimized option to > configure. When I build the latest trunk, I'm now seeing 18 failing > tests: >    Clang :: Preprocessor/macro_paste_c_block_comment.c >    LLVM ::