similar to: [LLVMdev] Estimate Execution Time

Hi Matt, Thanks you so much for the reply! I've tried the llvm-mca, it is helpful. I was wondering whether the llvm-mca support the assembly code for the ARM? I cross-compile the test file for ARM like that: clang test.c -O2 -target arm-linux-gnueabihf -static -S -o test.s If I want to check the performance using llvm-mca, is there any option of "-mcpu" for ARM ? Thanks, Yin

Hi Yin, From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Yin Liu via llvm-dev > Hello, > > As is known to all, there is a relationship between program's instructions and its execution time. In other words, we can estimate the execution time based on the number of program > instructions. > > I'm curious about what the relationship between IR

Hi Yin, MCA does support the –mcpu and –mtriple options. We have one arm test in llvm/test/tools/llvm-mca/ARM for a cortex-9, which is an Out of Order chip. Hope that helps! -Matt From: Yin Liu <yinliu.tiger at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 2:49 PM To: Davis, Matthew <Matthew.Davis at sony.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Is there any relationship

Hello, As is known to all, there is a relationship between program's instructions and its execution time. In other words, we can estimate the execution time based on the number of program instructions. I'm curious about what the relationship between IR instruction and execution time. I know the number of program instructions and the execution time is highly related to the platform and

Thank you for your reply Yes, I change them, so what should I do for another loops? On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:54 PM, neda 8664 <neda8664 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for your reply > > Yes, I change them, so what should I do for another loops? > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > >> On 12/12/11 9:59 AM,

On 8/7/11 2:41 AM, neda 8664 wrote: > i could not use profile.pl <http://profile.pl>, however i did > reinstall the llvm but didn't solve my problem. is there is another > way to extract profilling information in llvm? First, I believe that profile.pl is just a script that automates the profiling process. You should be able to do whatever it is that the script is doing

On 12/12/11 10:25 AM, neda 8664 wrote: > > Thank you for your reply > > Yes, I change them, so what should I do for another loops? I don't really know what you should do since I don't know what your code does. All I know is that it's changing the function's control-flow graph. If you're not modifying the structure of the loops in the function, then you can

hi all, I want access to all basic blocks of function in a loop, so I used the following code: *bool parallel::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) { for (Function::iterator bi= func->begin(); bi != func->end(); bi++){ // } }* First loop run without problem, but for second loop I get the following error: *0 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x0137d530 1 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x0137fa6c 2

i could not use profile.pl, however i did reinstall the llvm but didn't solve my problem. is there is another way to extract profilling information in llvm? i have another question, i want know how can estimate execution time for each operand such as mul ,add, ... ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All I extract Def_Use chain by following code: for (Value::use_iterator i = F->use_begin(), e = F->use_end(); i != e; ++i) if (Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*i)) { errs() << "F is used in instruction:\n"; errs() << *Inst << "\n"; } Now, I want to distinguish the register name or memory variable that lead to

Now, we come to more evaluations on http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/recent_activity I mainly care about the compile-time and execution time impact for the following cases: pBasic (run 45): clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so pNoGenSCEV (run 44): clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so -polly-codegen-scev -polly -polly-optimizer=none -polly-code-generator=none pNoGenSCEV_nocan (run 47): same option

Hello All, Thanks for the reply.I can generate the reports by compiling Spec through llvm, but that couldn't resolve my problem. I m trying to determine execution time for the bytecode and native files , which are obtained as a result of running my pass over the original bytecode .I am running these experiments on spec benchmark. In SPEC we have command line tools such as runspec where

At 2013-09-09 05:52:35,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 09/08/2013 08:03 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> >> I have done some basic experiments about Polly canonicalization passes and I found the SCEV canonicalization has significant impact on both compile-time and execution-time performance. > >Interesting. > >>

Hello all, I am a LLVM newer who want to obtain the use-def chain for all instruction of a sample code, for this purpose i use the following code. ///////////////sample code:///////////////////////// #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #define ARRAY_SIZE 5 int main() { int x, y, holder; int k,z,f,i; z=0; f=0; k=0; for(x = 0; x < ARRAY_SIZE;

I am changing structure of loops, I used std::vector<> but i get same error, I can’t use FunctionPass :( On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:03 PM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 12/12/11 10:25 AM, neda 8664 wrote: > > Thank you for your reply > Yes, I change them, so what should I do for another loops? > > > I don't really know what you should

Hello all, I have evaluated the compile-time and execution-time performance of Polly canonicalization passes. Details can be referred to http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/recent_activity. There are four runs: pollyBasic (run 45): clang -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang LLVMPolly.so pollyNoGenSCEV (run 44): clang -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang LLVMPolly.so -mllvm -polly -mllvm -polly-codegen-scev

On 09/09/2013 05:18 AM, Star Tan wrote: > > At 2013-09-09 05:52:35,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > >> On 09/08/2013 08:03 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Also, I wonder if your runs include the dependence analysis. If this is >> the case, the numbers are very good. Otherwise, 30% overhead seems still >> to be a little bit much. > I think

Dear R-help, I am trying to obtain the baseline survival estimate of a fitted Cox model (S_0 (t)). I know that previous posts have said use 'basehaz' but this gives the baseline hazard function and not the baseline survival estimate. Is there a way to obtain the baseline survival estimate or do I have to use the formula which does something like S(t) = exp[- the integral from 0 to t of

Hi I am trying to dynamically monitor an application in Wine. Specifically I would like to know if there is some sort of 'ptrace' like API which will allow me to attach to a windows executable single step through the program and obtain the contents of the registers and the instruction pointer as the single stepping proceeds. I know I could manually single step via winedbg but I would like

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:35 AM, roy rosen <roy.1rosen at gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/5/24 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:02 AM, roy rosen <roy.1rosen at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I was wondering if LLVM supports predicates and conditional execution. > >>