similar to: [LLVMdev] Is it possible to store some info and use it after emitting the bitcode file?

Hi Chen, On Jul 8, 2011, at 11:56 AM, kobe James wrote: > Hi All, > > I hope to get some information about functions in a bitcode file. Say, if we have a function foo(), and the bitcode file is generated by a single source file, then I want to get the line number foo() locates in that source file. > If the bitcode file is linked by multiple bitcode files, is it possible to also get

Hi All, I hope to get some information about functions in a bitcode file. Say, if we have a function foo(), and the bitcode file is generated by a single source file, then I want to get the line number foo() locates in that source file. If the bitcode file is linked by multiple bitcode files, is it possible to also get which file foo() locates in? Thanks, Chen -------------- next part

Dear developers, OpenSSH 4.3 (both p1 and p2) has a number of issues on IRIX 5.3 which were not present with 4.2p1: configure thinks that a number of header files are unusable. This is because in order to use them other headers such as sys/types.h must be included as well, and configure's test code does not do so. checking ia.h usability... no checking ia.h presence... yes configure:

Thanks for your reply. Probably I did not explain clearly. Here is an example: call @check(%foo) %1 = load %foo Now I want to write optimization only focus on the function call @check, and it might have some additional information which does not need to appear at LLVM IR. So it seems that the annotation intrinsic does not fit the scenario. Haohui On Jan 21, 2009, at 8:01 PM, Tanya M.

Dear all, Currently I'm working on a project that add various checks into the LLVM bitcode. For example, I insert function calls before every load / store instructions to guarantee that these instructions are safe. I really want to implement them as LLVM intrinsics or ``special function calls'' so that I am able to leverage the power of things like InstVisitor. However, it

Problem - smbpasswd does not seem to be recognizing my "add user script" option to automatically create Unix users when adding a samba user. I am running Samba version 2.2.8a (from source) on a Linux (Redhat 8.0) system. Relevant lines from smb.conf: [global] server string=Samba Server netbios name = smbpdc security = user domain logons=yes domain master = yes

Does the llvm annotation intrinsic not work for what you are trying to do? http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#int_var_annotation http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#int_annotation -Tanya On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Haohui Mai wrote: > Dear all, > > Currently I'm working on a project that add various checks into the > LLVM bitcode. For example, I insert function calls before every >

On 01/28/2017 10:36 AM, Piotr Padlewski wrote: > > > 2017-01-26 15:41 GMT+01:00 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov > <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>>: > > > On 01/26/2017 06:44 AM, Piotr Padlewski wrote: >> >> >> 2017-01-26 3:28 GMT+01:00 Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk >> <mailto:richard at metafoo.co.uk>>: >>

2017-01-26 15:41 GMT+01:00 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>: > > On 01/26/2017 06:44 AM, Piotr Padlewski wrote: > > > > 2017-01-26 3:28 GMT+01:00 Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>: > >> On 25 January 2017 at 15:03, Hal Finkel via cfe-dev < >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Piotr, >>> >>> I think

Hello , everyone I am a newcomer to xen , which i study in recent months . I have deploy the xen-4.1.2 on dell server , centos as dom0 , now , i use the vhd format to be the virtual hard disk , after i execute " xm new ***.cfg" , this vm generate the vm in "xm list" , but when i execute " xm start *** ", "Error: Boot loader didn''t return any data

Hi, I'm trying to calculate 95% confidence interval of C statistic of logistic regression model using rcorr.cens in rms package. I wrote a brief function for this purpose as the followings; CstatisticCI <- function(x) # x is object of rcorr.cens. { se <- x["S.D."]/sqrt(x["n"]) Low95 <- x["C Index"] - 1.96*se Upper95 <- x["C

Hi, I am generating llvm IR code for C source code using clang as the front end. I am wondering if there is any way of mapping an llvm IR line number back to its C source code line number. Thanks Sincerely Arvind ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ Arvind Sudarsanam Phone: (435) 512-7769 CPU Technology, Inc

2017-01-26 3:28 GMT+01:00 Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>: > On 25 January 2017 at 15:03, Hal Finkel via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> I think makes sense. Modulo bitcasts, the invariant is identified by a >> particular pointer SSA value. Given that you can't sensibly have two >> nonequivalent

Hello together, how can i insert annotations in IR ? I want actually write something like: CallInst *call = CallInst::Create( ??? , aBasicBlock); in my pass. Regards Raad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090305/cd1db761/attachment.html>

I'm trying to link two modules together using the C++ API, one that's a sort of library module and one that's being generated from the source language. If I have something like this: OwningPtr<MemoryBuffer> owning_ptr; if (MemoryBuffer::getFile(StringRef("../hello.bc"), owning_ptr)) std::cout << "error opening file" << std::endl; Module* Lib

Hi, I am trying to construct a logistic regression model from my data (104 patients and 25 events). I build a full model consisting of five predictors with the use of penalization by rms package (lrm, pentrace etc) because of events per variable issue. Then, I tried to approximate the full model by step-down technique predicting L from all of the componet variables using ordinary least squares

Hi llvm-dev! I have attached the current state of my GSoC work in patches [1] for review; this currently allows LLVM to correctly handle functions running out of stack space and variable sized stack objects. Firstly, since I think it is better to get things merged in small chunks, I'd like to have some specific feedback on where my work stands in terms of mergeability. Secondly, I had been

If I put only one plot in a png, I can drag the generated png on the edges and it changes its size by this. But when I put several plots on the same sheet using mfrow, the size can no longer be changed when viewing the file, and the resolution is bad. What do I need to do to keep the variability of size in a multiple figure environment?

Red alert people. When ogg starts to make money for someone (whoever if anyone at all,) then the boys in the legal team at Fraunhofer will throw something at it in the form of "hey, you are stepping on our IP" and then sue. Until then, what is the point. So.... Until then, this argument is pointless. Lithium On Sat, 09 June 2001, Sean /The RIMBoy/ wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Jun

Folks, I'm fairly sure that I'm doing something stupid, but I'm getting a few really strange results from *some* of the distributions, but by no means all, when I link directly to the R shared library. I've tried this on both Windows with the precompiled Mingw binary of R-2.5.0 (compiling my code with MinGW-3.4.2), and by building R-2.5.0 on Mandriva Linux with gcc-3.4.4 and