Read about the @llvm.annotation family of intrinsics.
http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#int_var_annotation
llvm::Annotatable is a deprecated means of maintaining "on the side"
data structures internal to the compiler. Its name is misleading, and
it has nothing to do with the sort of annotations most people are
interested in. We would like it to go away; it is currently used only
to attach the temporary MachineFunction data structure to a Function
during code generation. Developers with interest Annotatable as it
stands are advised to use a SmallPtrSet instead.
On 2009-03-05, at 19:31, kapil anand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I know, Instruction class does not inherit "Annotable"
> Class. Only Function inherits annotable according to the
> documentation of annotable class.
>
> What you are asking would require adding annotations at instruction
> level, which does not seem to be possible. You can maintain external
> maps between instructions and your annotations,
>
> --Kapil
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:17 PM, RAAD B <raad_7007 at yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Hello together,
>
> how can i insert annotations in IR ?
>
> I want actually write something like:
> CallInst *call = CallInst::Create( ??? , aBasicBlock);
>
>
> in my pass.
>
>
> Regards
> Raad
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090305/65710c33/attachment.html>