similar to: [LLVMdev] Announcing: LLVM 2.9 RC2 Testing Phase

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 15:07, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were > addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing. > > This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and > complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties.

On 2011-03-25 08:07, Bill Wendling wrote: > Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing. > > This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties. Please download the sources, compile them, and then compile as much

On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Dongsheng Song wrote: > Tested with gcc 4.5.3 (20100324) on i686-w64-windows: > > http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/gcc-4.5.3-windows_20110324.tar.xz > http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-win32.tar.xz > http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-win32.zip > > [[[ > ******************** > Testing: 0 .. 10..

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 09:51, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find > them here: > > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ > > Please download them, build them, and compile things to your heart's > content. And most importantly file a bunch of bug reports. :-) > > Share and

There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find them here: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ Please download them, build them, and compile things to your heart's content. And most importantly file a bunch of bug reports. :-) Share and enjoy! -bw

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:41, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 09:51, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find >> them here: >> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ >> >> Please download them, build them, and

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail.com> wrote: > The following failures is very strange: See Bug 6745 - .ll output is different on windows. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6745 On mingw32, PRINTF_EXPONENT_DIGITS affects printf and tests would run with PRINTF_EXPONENT_DIGITS=2. An addition, it seems mingw-w64's printf tends to drop minus sign

I think we need to relax the test cases. MSVC usually prints the calling convention, and it's often useful information. Maybe we can make the diagnostic text smaller by using the __thiscall, __cdecl, __stdcall, etc keywords when printing types with LangOpts.MicrosoftExt, but it will require moving the attribute from after the identifier to before, which is exciting. On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > It would be nice if we could make the TypePrinter not print the > calling convention if it's the default one for the ABI, but > TypePrinter doesn't have a lot of context.. no Sema, no ASTContext :/ > Does this patch fix any failures for you? It doesn't fix that test case, unfortunately.

Moin, I wrote a small backup script that use rsync: r5backup (http://sourceforge.net/projects/r5backup/). It backup dozen of unix machines for many people. But when I try to backup /var/lib/zope2.9 I get an error 11. It does not matter if zope is running or not. I can't see an error meassge in the (verbose) logfile: [client] parse_filter_file(/etc/r5backup/profiles/boulder.exclude,0,3)

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> >> It would be nice if we could make the TypePrinter not print the >> calling convention if it's the default one for the ABI, but >> TypePrinter doesn't have a lot of context.. no Sema, no

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > I think we need to relax the test cases. MSVC usually prints the calling > convention, and it's often useful information. I was going to argue that MSVC doesn't print them, but then I tried, and you're right - it does :) I'll start relaxing the tests then. > Maybe we can make the

Is there have simplest way to make domain users which in remote desktop group can remote/local logon the workstation ? Thanks.

samba 4.1.13, server role is active directory domain controller. On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Tim <rintimtim at gmx.net> wrote: > What version and server mode are you talking about? > > Am 19. Dezember 2014 16:53:57 MEZ, schrieb Dongsheng Song > <dongsheng.song at gmail.com>: >> >> Is there have simplest way to make domain users which in remote >>

Hi David, Yes. It was the main reason why I decided to do an RC3. :-) -bw On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:41 AM, David Terei wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Is the fix for Bug 9561 included? (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9561) > > Cheers, > David. > > On 26 March 2011 18:38, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The good news:

Hi, named exited when loading 'AD DNS Zone': Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01 named[4498]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01 named[4498]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=elephanttalk,DC=cn Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01 named[4498]: samba_dlz: starting configure Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01 named[4498]: zone 30.168.192.in-addr.arpa/NONE: has 0 SOA records Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01

> There are a handful other tests failing in the same way. > > It would be nice if we could make the TypePrinter not print the > calling convention if it's the default one for the ABI, but > TypePrinter doesn't have a lot of context.. no Sema, no ASTContext :/ They are all TypePrinter failures like this one? If so I would say we should not block on it since it is a small

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Tim <rintimtim at gmx.net> wrote: > Then I would do it with a group policy. Have a look right here: > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee791928(v=WS.10).aspx > > Remind that you leave the default policies untouched. Create a new GPo and > link it to your desired OU. > After put domain users in the remote destop group in the DC,

Hi Bill, Is the fix for Bug 9561 included? (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9561) Cheers, David. On 26 March 2011 18:38, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The good news: RC2 testing was successful in that it uncovered a bad regression from 2.8 (which existed in top-of-tree). It also showed that there was an unincorporated fix that needed to go into

Anyone who has met such a kind of problem? I am adding i18n characteristics to my webapp using gettext,it works under IE,while not under firefox. here is my codes: po: po\zh_CN\myapp.po after rake makemo, i have got: locale\zh_CN\LC_MESSAGES\myapp.mo require ''gettext/rails'' class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base init_gettext "myapp" end Then I use