similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 RC1 Pre-release Tarballs

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 09:51, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find > them here: > > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ > > Please download them, build them, and compile things to your heart's > content. And most importantly file a bunch of bug reports. :-) > > Share and

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:41, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 09:51, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > >> There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find >> them here: >> >> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/ >> >> Please download them, build them, and

On 2011-03-09 02:51, Bill Wendling wrote: > There are LLVM 2.9 RC1 pre-release tarballs source available. You can find them here: > llvm 2.9rc1 test on Dualcore ARM running Ubuntu Natty gunzip llvm-2.9rc1.src.tar.gz tar zxvf llvm-2.9rc1.src.tar cd llvm-2.9-build ../llvm-2.9rc1/configure --enable-shared time make clean ;time make CXXFLAGS=-marm CFLAGS=-marm xranby at

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song at gmail.com> wrote: > The following failures is very strange: See Bug 6745 - .ll output is different on windows. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6745 On mingw32, PRINTF_EXPONENT_DIGITS affects printf and tests would run with PRINTF_EXPONENT_DIGITS=2. An addition, it seems mingw-w64's printf tends to drop minus sign

In -help output, -help - Display available options (--help-hidden for more) Both single and double - option markers are accepted, which is good. It would probably be better to refer to options consistently using the single marker in all cases. =linearscan - linear scan register allocator =pbqp - PBQP

Hello Xerxes, > llvm 2.9rc1 test on Dualcore ARM running Ubuntu Natty What is the gcc used for the compilation? Can you try to do the -O0 build and see whether this changed the stuff? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hi Russell, I took care of these points except for > In -version output, > > Low Level Virtual Machine (http://llvm.org/): > llvm version 2.6svn > Optimized build. > Built Feb 14 2010(11:05:20). > > Registered Targets: > alpha - Alpha [experimental] > arm - ARM > bfin - Analog Devices Blackfin [experimental] > c - C

On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > On 2011-03-14 18:14, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> Hello Xerxes, >> >>> llvm 2.9rc1 test on Dualcore ARM running Ubuntu Natty >> What is the gcc used for the compilation? Can you try to do the -O0 >> build and see whether this changed the stuff? >> > > xranby at panda:/media/dh0/llvm-2.9-build-O0$

On 2011-03-14 18:14, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello Xerxes, > >> llvm 2.9rc1 test on Dualcore ARM running Ubuntu Natty > What is the gcc used for the compilation? Can you try to do the -O0 > build and see whether this changed the stuff? > xranby at panda:/media/dh0/llvm-2.9-build-O0$ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-5ubuntu1) 4.5.2 Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software

> I have installed LLVM on my machine (ubuntu) a while ago. I think my LLVM version is 2.8. is it supported in 2.8 ? When I install i didn't configure LLVM for mips. Do I have to configure it when I build ? I don't know what's the default llvm configuration for ubuntu! But you can check for mips support using "llc --version". Yes, it's supported in 2.8, although it

Ok. And what does llvm-gcc --version show? --- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov On Mar 6, 2012 5:22 PM, "Rafael Parizi" <parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote: > > For compile and link Basicmath files (using shell script): > > llvm-gcc -emit-llvm basicmath_small.c -c -o basicmath_small.bc > llvm-gcc -emit-llvm cubic.c -c -o cubic.bc > llvm-gcc -emit-llvm

I have installed LLVM on my machine (ubuntu) a while ago. I think my LLVM version is 2.8. is it supported in 2.8 ? When I install i didn't configure LLVM for mips. Do I have to configure it when I build ? Thanks in advance. Really appreciate it. --- On Thu, 9/1/11, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com> wrote: From: Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com>

For compile and link Basicmath files (using shell script): llvm-gcc -emit-llvm basicmath_small.c -c -o basicmath_small.bc llvm-gcc -emit-llvm cubic.c -c -o cubic.bc llvm-gcc -emit-llvm isqrt.c -c -o isqrt.bc llvm-gcc -emit-llvm rad2deg.c -c -o rad2deg.bc llvm-link basicmath_small.bc cubic.bc isqrt.bc rad2deg.bc -o basicmath.bc

Is there have simplest way to make domain users which in remote desktop group can remote/local logon the workstation ? Thanks.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 15:07, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were > addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing. > > This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and > complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties.

samba 4.1.13, server role is active directory domain controller. On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Tim <rintimtim at gmx.net> wrote: > What version and server mode are you talking about? > > Am 19. Dezember 2014 16:53:57 MEZ, schrieb Dongsheng Song > <dongsheng.song at gmail.com>: >> >> Is there have simplest way to make domain users which in remote >>

Hi, named exited when loading 'AD DNS Zone': Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01 named[4498]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01 named[4498]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=elephanttalk,DC=cn Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01 named[4498]: samba_dlz: starting configure Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01 named[4498]: zone 30.168.192.in-addr.arpa/NONE: has 0 SOA records Feb 03 17:46:43 ID-01

Hi all, Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing. This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties. Please download the sources, compile them, and then compile as much as you can with both clang and llvm-gcc.

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Tim <rintimtim at gmx.net> wrote: > Then I would do it with a group policy. Have a look right here: > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee791928(v=WS.10).aspx > > Remind that you leave the default policies untouched. Create a new GPo and > link it to your desired OU. > After put domain users in the remote destop group in the DC,

If I have an instruction which has many register and immediate operands, what's the difference between these two implementations to define the instruction in TableGen *.td file? (1) Similar to what has been done to complex X86 addressing mode. A single 32-bit immediate (i32) encodes how to add many MachineOperands to the MachineInstr object (With the help of functions in X86InstrBuilder.h).