Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] static analyzer & ubigraph visualization"
2011 Mar 08
0
[LLVMdev] static analyzer & ubigraph visualization
Hi Carl,
For future reference, the correct list for questions on the analyzer is cfe-dev, not llvmdev.
CCC_UBI is meant to display the analysis path graph (aka "exploded graph") as it gets explored by the analyzer. I haven't run it in a while, so it may be broken. I will investigate.
Ted
On Mar 8, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Carl Norum wrote:
> I updated our project recently to use
2011 Mar 08
1
[LLVMdev] static analyzer & ubigraph visualization
Hi Carl,
I think the trick is to use a debug build of Clang. The ubigraph support is not enabled in a release build as it is in a hot path of the analyzer. I switched to using a debug build and the ubigraph support worked for me. You also need the 'ubiviz' script in your path.
Ted
On Mar 8, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Ted Kremenek wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> For future reference, the
2012 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
(forwarding to llvm-dev)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
To: Carl Norum <carl at lytro.com>
Will something like this fix the problem?
if (!Subtarget.isLinux()) {
reserve GP and GP_64
}
To improve code, we have stopped reserving GP as a dedicated
2012 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote:
> (forwarding to llvm-dev)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
> To: Carl Norum <carl at lytro.com>
>
>
> Will something like this fix the problem?
>
> if
2012 Aug 16
3
[LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Carl Norum <carl at lytro.com> wrote:
>>> -march=mips32r2
>>> -mtune=4kem
>>> -msoft-float
>>> -EL
>>>
>>> -Xclang -triple -Xclang mipsel-sde-elf
>>> -Xclang -mrelocation-model -Xclang static
>>>
>>>
2013 Jun 04
5
[LLVMdev] bug or expected behaviour?
On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Tyler Hardin <tghardin1 at catamount.wcu.edu> wrote:
> I was suggesting to add it to the function, like
> volatile void func(..);
> Theoretically, this would tell the compiler not to omit seemingly superfluous calls to func.
'volatile' can't apply to a function, so I'm not sure what you mean. In your example, 'volatile' modifies
2012 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Carl Norum <carl at lytro.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Carl Norum <carl at lytro.com> wrote:
>>>> -march=mips32r2
>>>> -mtune=4kem
>>>> -msoft-float
>>>> -EL
>>>>
>>>> -Xclang
2012 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
Hi LLVM MIPS people,
I've been trying to keep track of the MIPS backend in order to eventually switch to clang/llvm from GCC for building our camera software. We've been using a build at revision 156432 for some time with no problems. I synced up to TOT clang/llvm today (revision 162004) to see if any optimizations had been improved, etc. The build I made with it started crashing
2011 Feb 21
2
[LLVMdev] Passing structures as pointers, MSVC x64 style
The MS x64 ABI calling convention (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235286(VS.80).aspx) says:
Any argument that doesn’t fit in 8 bytes, or is not 1, 2, 4, or 8 bytes, must be passed by reference.
Clang isn't doing that for us when passing our triple, x86_64-pc-win32-macho.
Here's a simple example program:
struct Guid {
unsigned int Data1;
unsigned
2013 Jun 05
0
[LLVMdev] bug or expected behaviour?
Hi Carl,
I don't know much about the specifics of any given optimisation, but if you do something like the following, you can at least see which optimisation pass is responsible.
At the very least perhaps that can point to the next place to investigate. (also interesting to note Apple's shipped clang doesn't exhibit this behaviour, I had to use my own recent svn tree)
$ clang -arch
2012 Aug 17
1
[LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
On Aug 16, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> That's weird... you're probably triggering some sort of bad case in
> the driver logic which tries to call gcc to assemble and link on
> targets where we don't know what to do. That logic is generally a bit
> shaky to begin with.
It sounds like that means "time to file a bug". =) Which product should I file
2013 Jun 05
1
[LLVMdev] bug or expected behaviour?
On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Tyler Hardin <tghardin1 at catamount.wcu.edu> wrote:
> I tried the "extern" specifier, which (I guess) you should use if the definition isn't in the file; and it worked with -O3.
That 'extern' doesn't do anything - it's implicit. Did you try without it and get different results? In my test here with the Mac OS X dev tools
2013 Jun 05
1
[LLVMdev] bug or expected behaviour?
On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:50 AM, John Regehr <regehr at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> The optimizer can therefore conclude that if this program has well-defined behavior, then x can never point to the null pointer constant (since the null pointer constant is not part of any array object). As a result, the "if (!x)" branch would never trigger, and is dead code.
>
> This is
2012 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] MIPS & GP register
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Carl Norum <carl at lytro.com> wrote:
>> -march=mips32r2
>> -mtune=4kem
>> -msoft-float
>> -EL
>>
>> -Xclang -triple -Xclang mipsel-sde-elf
>> -Xclang -mrelocation-model -Xclang static
>>
>> -Xclang -mllvm -Xclang -mips-ssection-threshold=0
>> -Xclang -mllvm -Xclang
2013 Jun 05
4
[LLVMdev] bug or expected behaviour?
On 6/4/2013 7:31 PM, David Mirabito wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> I don't know much about the specifics of any given optimisation, but if you do something like the following, you can at least see which optimisation pass is responsible.
> At the very least perhaps that can point to the next place to investigate. (also interesting to note Apple's shipped clang doesn't exhibit this
2016 Sep 12
2
[PATCH] v2v: ova: Make OVA directory public readable to work around libvirt bug (RHBZ#1375157).
Only do this if running as root and if the backend is set
to libvirt.
---
v2v/input_ova.ml | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/v2v/input_ova.ml b/v2v/input_ova.ml
index 4f848e2..bb9cb1b 100644
--- a/v2v/input_ova.ml
+++ b/v2v/input_ova.ml
@@ -104,6 +104,19 @@ object
(* Exploded path must be absolute (RHBZ#1155121). *)
let exploded = absolute_path exploded
2016 Aug 08
1
[PATCH] sparsify, v2v: use Common_utils.absolute_path
Use the common function for ensuring a path is absolute; it should not
change the behaviour at all.
---
sparsify/cmdline.ml | 6 +-----
v2v/input_disk.ml | 4 +---
v2v/input_ova.ml | 4 +---
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sparsify/cmdline.ml b/sparsify/cmdline.ml
index 3eb0d5b..523d612 100644
--- a/sparsify/cmdline.ml
+++ b/sparsify/cmdline.ml
@@ -142,11
2010 Jul 27
2
Asterisk Gurus - What is your best Asterisk Queue Analyzer and Asterisk Log Analyzer program out there?
Hi Guys,
I seem to not be able to find any good open source Asterisk Queue Analyzer
and Asterisk Log Analyzer on the web.
The Asterisk Queue Analyzer is to serve as the graphic tool for call center
or pbx admins. It will pull the info in queue.log and in MySQL asterisk CDR
to create a graphic bar or to report on each extension that received the
queue calls, etc...
The Asterisk Log Analyzer is
2009 Nov 20
3
symbol in the plot
a graph question. Thanks a lot in advance.
I made two scatterplots on one graph (sigma vs. delta1, sigma vs. delta2)
(20 observations of delta1, delta2 and corresponding sigma) the x-axis is
sigma, the y-axis is either delta1 or delta2. I connected both scatterplots.
To seperate them, one curves is a line with circles, the other curve is a
line with squares on it.
I want to make a notation
2007 Mar 06
1
case-sensitivity of analyzer
Is there anything about this analyzer that says "case-sensitive" to you?
module Ferret::Analysis
class StemmingAnalyzer
def token_stream(field, text)
StemFilter.new(StandardTokenizer.new(text))
end
end
end
Just wondering how I can force my index to be case-insensitive.
Thanks,
-Adam
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.