similar to: [LLVMdev] Building LLVM on MinGW32 / Windows 7 Professional x64

Hi Andrew, > When I try to compile LLVM, a dialog pops up halfway through the process: > "tblgen.exe has stopped working" and the build quits. > > I would really appreciate a binary pack for llvm-as, llc, etc. indeed windows is the only platform for which the LLVM core tools like llvm-as, llc etc are not provided in the binary distribution. I think it would be better if

How can we improve URL detection in Markdown? I posted a question on Stack Overflow and happened to click a URL in my post. To my surprise, it wasn't functional, and it took three different, nonintuitive manipulations before I achieved a functional URL. Stack Overflow says "not my problem", so I'm deferring to Markdown itself. Here's a

Can Hello World be written in LLVM assembly without using a C library function like "puts"? Cheers, Andrew Pennebaker www.yellosoft.us -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120929/ed2e5f2f/attachment.html>

Based on the published rsync algorithm (pdf<http://cs.anu.edu.au/techreports/1996/TR-CS-96-05.pdf>), it appears to filter definitely different blocks from possibly unchanged blocks using weak hashing, then applying strong hashing to double-check the rest of the file for true differences. MD4 and MD5 do experience collisions, so isn't rsync fast at the risk of being inaccurate? If I can

I'm trying to compile hello.c with clang.exe, but I'm getting an error about missing cstdlib headers. Source: https://github.com/mcandre/mcandre/tree/master/c/hello/ Trace: C:\Users\andrew\Desktop\src\mcandre\c\hello>gmake clang -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wmost -Weverything -o hello hello.c hello.c:1:10: fatal error: 'stdio.h' file not found #include <stdio.h> ^ 1

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: >> I would really appreciate a binary pack for llvm-as, llc, etc. > > indeed windows is the only platform for which the LLVM core tools like > llvm-as, llc etc are not provided in the binary distribution. I think > it would be better if they were included. The only binary distribution related to LLVM 2.8 and Windows on the

On 05/03/11 15:01, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> writes: > >>> I would really appreciate a binary pack for llvm-as, llc, etc. >> >> indeed windows is the only platform for which the LLVM core tools like >> llvm-as, llc etc are not provided in the binary distribution. I think >> it would be better if they were included. >

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: >>> indeed windows is the only platform for which the LLVM core tools like >>> llvm-as, llc etc are not provided in the binary distribution. I think >>> it would be better if they were included. >> >> The only binary distribution related to LLVM 2.8 and Windows on the >> Download page is "LLVM-GCC

On 11/13/2011 8:57 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > AFAIK, on msys, trunk and release_30 is almost fine. > http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-msys Though, here is no builder > on win32 with --enable-shared. I'm having a problem now, building Release Candidate 3 on msys (using msysGit environment, which I find the easiest to set up and keep isolated); with --enable-optimized

Well, it does have a Registry& that's defined in Reader.h. But that can be forward declared (and apparently is in some of the other headers it includes. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Andreas Wendleder < andreas.wendleder at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi > > - passes depend on Reader and Writer >> > > That's an easy one. Compile tested on Windows with

I used to be able to `apt-get install llvm` to install `llvm-as`, an LLVM assembler. I think some tools/packages have moved around since then. What can I use to compile `.ll` assembler files into executables? -- Cheers, Andrew Pennebaker www.yellosoft.us -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Andrew, This might be offtopic for llvmdev. I suggest the mailing list, cfe-users. > * clang.exe version 3.4 (trunk), from LLVM 3.4.svn How did you build it? clang.exe depends on crt libraries, either mingw32 or msvcrt. Please try (and watch their output); > clang --version > clang -v -O2 -o hello.exe hello.c Please confirm; - Which library did you install? Visual studio or

Modern Emacs uses a standard set of repos for managing emacs mode packages, so that all users need to add syntax highlighting for llvm-mode would be M-x package-install RET llvm-mode RET. Could we package llvm-mode for these repos? * MELPA <http://melpa.milkbox.net/> * Marmalade <http://marmalade-repo.org/> -- Cheers, Andrew Pennebaker www.yellosoft.us -------------- next part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, A friend of mine tried using RedCloth on Windows as part of a project I introduced hin to, but RedCloth failed to require. This is what he got: ====================================================================== c:\Ruby192\msysgit\msysgit\OpenRubyRMK\karfunkel>bundle exec rake - --trace rdoc rake aborted! no such file to load --

Yes, but if you look in LayoutPasses.c, it calls registry.referenceKindToString(..), so it does need the definition.. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <mailing at xenonium.com> wrote: > Using forward-declaration would not fix the layer violation. > > Le 10 juil. 2014 à 13:10, Bas van den Berg <b.van.den.berg.nl at gmail.com> > a écrit : > > Well,

On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before the R 3.2.0 release, but this now looks unlikely, unless someone else with experience building

Here are our notes on 1.1.4 testing on Windows 1. Compile Error with regular mode (FIXED_POINT undefined) at lsp.c line 104 static inline spx_word16_t spx_cos(spx_word16_t x) . VS6 does not like the inline keyword here. Removing it allows compiling. same with cb_search_sse.h line 34. 2. Compile Error with quant_lsp.c line 55. M_PI is undefined. Either it needs to be included

From: Thorvald Natvig <slicer at users.sourceforge.net> Some optimizing compilers miscompile the current SSE optimizations when full optimizations are enabled. By using output value pointer instead of a return value, we can bypass this misbehaviour. --- libspeex/resample.c | 8 ++++---- libspeex/resample_sse.h | 24 ++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 20

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 721 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/19990915/82d1800c/attachment.pl

I've run a new scan of LLD's architecture and it appears to be getting cleaner! There are still some upward dependencies however: - core depends on Reader and Writer - passes depend on Reader and Writer - ReaderWriter/PECOFF/ReaderCOFF.cpp depends on Driver.h The updated architecture can be seen here: http://www.c2lang.org/docs/lld_architecture_20140710.png On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:07